Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi Intiqad: Jurnal Agama dan Pendidikan Islam
Achyar Zein
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan
Religion Arts Humanities Education Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemikiran Pendidikan Asy-Syaikh As-Sa‘di dalam Tafsir Taysir Al-Karim Ar-Rahman Fi Tafsir Kalam Al-Mannan Wagiman Manik; Achyar Zein
Intiqad: Jurnal Agama dan Pendidikan Islam Vol 11, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : UMSU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/intiqad.v11i2.3688

Abstract

One of the characteristics and signs that a person is a good and noble human being, is that the person provides many benefits to others, both directly and indirectly. Asy-Shaykhas-Sa'di is a person who provides many benefits and kindness to others, through the knowledge he taught to others while he was still alive, and through his works and writings which are widely read and used as references by prosecutors science and society in general.As-Shaykh as-Sa‘di conducts careful and in-depth study and analysis of the verses of the al-Quran through its interpretations, which are related to educators, students, curriculum and Islamic education methods. One of the important elements and matters in education is educators. Educators according to as-Shaykh as-Sa‘di are figures who can be role models and follow-ups, because he has a noble character both for himself, his students and with the community and the environment.Students who are explained by ash-Shaykhas-Sa'di are those who must have good character, both towards themselves, their educators and the community is the creed or the points of faith, worship, moral and muamalah, then the curriculum presented by ash-Shaykhas-Sa'di is still general in nature. Then the success of educators in delivering materials that have been determined in the curriculum, must be delivered with proper methods and adjusted, so that students can understand easily and quickly all the material delivered by educators.
Criteria for Publishing in Reputable International Journals: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Decision Model Ismail Husein; Achyar Zein; Ulrich Faigle
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi Vol 10, No 1 (2025): CAUCHY: JURNAL MATEMATIKA MURNI DAN APLIKASI
Publisher : Mathematics Department, Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/cauchy.v10i1.30903

Abstract

The problem faced by researchers, in this case lecturers at universities, after carrying out research and making research reports is deciding where to publish the results of their research. Analytic Hierarchy Process is an effective method for ranking alternative journals. This helps ensure that their research is published in a reputable journal that will reach the appropriate audience and have a positive impact on their career. The data collection method in this research was first sourced from books, the internet, and previously a study of articles and journals; secondly, create a checklist of criteria and sub-criteria from 20 (twenty) articles, namely 4 articles from Elsevier, 4 articles from Springer Nature, 4 articles from Taylor Francis, 4 articles from Wiley-Blackwell, and 4 articles from Sage. Article selection was carried out randomly. The results of distributing questionnaires were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Online System designed by Klaus D. Goepel. The main aim of this study was to determine the appropriate weighting of several criteria that explain why previously published manuscripts are submitted to their intended publication. The criteria for accepting article manuscripts in reputable international journals using the Analytical Hierarchy Process model (standard Analytic Hierarchy Process linear scale methods) is that the first priority is the "novelty" criterion with a weight of 0.502. The second priority is the "scientific" criterion with a weight of 0.201. Furthermore, the third and fourth priorities are "manuscript" and "content" respectively with weights of 0.142 and 0.078. Meanwhile, the last priority is "Interesting" with a weight of 0.076.
Co-Authors Ismail Husein, Ismail Ulrich Faigle Wagiman Manik