Allan Fatchan Gani Wardana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KESESUAIAN PENGATURAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA DENGAN NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA Allan Fatchan Gani Wardana
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Pandemic, Human Right, and Public Regulations
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.180

Abstract

Villages as legal entities have more authority to regulate and manage their territorial affairs autonomously, one of which is to form Village-Owned Enterprises (BUM Desa). BUMDesa is one of the important capitals for the village to realize community empowerment and must be managed with a spirit of kinship and mutual cooperation . The regulations regarding BUMdesa are scattered in various regulations. This research examines two things, first how BUMDesa is regulated in statutory regulations, second is whether the regulation regarding BUMDesa is in accordance with Pancasila values. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. The results of the study concluded thatVillage BUM regulations are regulated in 3 (three) levels of statutory regulations (Laws, Government Regulations, and Ministerial Regulations). A very comprehensive arrangement is even regulated at the level of a Ministerial Regulation. Village BUM are pillars and milestones that can encourage village progress so that important things should be regulated at the level of Law, Second, Village BUM regulations in various regulations are normatively in accordance with Pancasila values, namely humanitarian, unity, populist principles. and justice has been used as the basis for the establishment, management, development, and utilization of the Village-Owned Enterprise (BUM Desa) business results.
Calon Tunggal dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Perspektif Hukum Progresif Allan Fatchan Gani Wardana
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art3

Abstract

Since its establishment until today, there have been many very progressive verdicts of Constitutional Court that can be used as the legal references for the acceleration of the legal reform in Indonesia. One of the verdicts of Constitutional Court is the one number 100/PUU-XIII/2015. This research is aimed to study the issues regarding first, whether the verdict of Constitutional Court Number 100/PUU-XIII/2015 on the single candidate in the election of the regional head and the deputy is included the progressive verdict? And second, what is the judicial implication of the Constitutional Court towards the nomination of the regional head and deputy? The research method used was the normative judicial method with the case approach. The results of the research concluded that first the verdict of the Constitutional Court Number 100/PUU-XIII/2015 is the progressive verdict. Second, the Verdict of the Constitutional Court has brought a judicial implication towards the nomination of the regional head and deputy that is by accommodating the single candidate in the implementation of the election of the regional head.