Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Sigit Nurhadi Nugraha
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
CIDERA JANJI (WANPRESTASI) DALAM PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PASAL 15 AYAT (3) UU NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Sigit Nurhadi Nugraha
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Pandemic, Human Right, and Public Regulations
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213

Abstract

Verdict of Constitution Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 makes a new reinterpretation to “breach of contract” or “default” based on article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 42 Year 1999 concerning Fidusiary Guarantee (hereinafter referred to “UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999”). Before the existence of this Constitution Court’s verdict, statement of “breach of contract” or “default”always be maked by creditor (as financing company) by his own opinion. This condition makes the creditor tend to act arbitrarily to the debtor which is in a weaker position. After the existence of constitution court’s verdict number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, “breach of contract” or “default” of the debtor must be determined based on the agreement between creditor dan debtor or it can be determined based on particular legal action, that’s by litigation procedure on court institution. This makes kreditor unable to to act arbitrarily anymore in determining of the debtor’s default.
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sigit Nurhadi Nugraha
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Elections and Cyber Law
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to resolve disputes over the results of general elections and local elections. Trial process of election and local election result disputes is based on formal aspects which aim to fulfill formal legal certainty, but sometimes formal legal certainty overrides aspects of justice, for example by not examining lawsuit if they do not meet the formal requirements (fail at the dismissal stage) so that attention is needed so that formal procedures are carried out in the Constitutional Court guarantees material / substantial justice. This paper uses a type of doctrinal normative research. The author concludes that justice can be achieved by fulfilling formal and material truths. So far, the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over election results has prioritized formal truth by enforcing rules that are formal in nature, but formal truth does not necessarily reflect material truth. Even though the Constitutional Court upholds formal law, it is hoped that it will also uphold material law by not imposing a dismissal procedure , or even though there is, a dismissal procedure is applied after examining evidence.
Co-Authors