Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMIKIRAN HUSEIN MUHAMMAD TENTANG KHITAN WANITA Nelli Fauziah
AL-HUKAMA: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): Desember 2015
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/al-hukama.2015.5.2.373-408

Abstract

Abstract: Gender issue is seemingly an interesting topic to discuss. One of the important figure on gender is a Husein Muhammad on his view about female circumcision. This study highlights about the analysis of Islamic law against Husein Muhammad’s thought on female circumcision in relation to the fulfillment of the couple’s biological needs. The result of the study concludes that: First, Husein Muhammad argues that female circumcision is equal to FGM, which circumcision is conducted by taking the clitoris, so it causes women to be frigid. According to him, the phenomenon of the female circumcision has no textual argumentation from both of al-Qur’an and al-Hadith. It, he said, is not the practice of Islam but rather adopted from the Jahiliyyah tradition and has no benefit (maslahah). Secondly, in his legal reasoning process, he uses qiyas (analogy) and maslahah mursalah (the restricted benefit). Third, Muhammad Husein’s thought about female circumcision in terms of Islamic law is not correct. Due to the Islamic law, according to the instruction of Prophet Muhammad, female circumcision is done by taking a skin membrane that covers the clitoris, not taking the clitoris. So that women will not lose her biological sexual pleasure during sexual intercourse. By fulfilling the biological needs between husband and wife then it can create a harmonious household, sakinah, mawaddah and rahmah.Abstrak: Persoalan gender seakan tidak pernah selesai untuk dibahas. Salah satu tokoh gender yang populer adalah Husein Muhammad yang pernah membahas tentang khitan wanita. Penelitian ini akan membahas bagaimana analisis hukum Islam terhadap pemikiran Husein Muhammad tentang khitan wanita dalam kaitannya dengan pemenuhan kebuthan biologis suami istri. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan: Pertama, Husein Muhammad berpendapat bahwa khitan wanita adalah sama dengan FGM, yakni khitan dilakukan dengan cara mengambil klitoris, sehingga menyebabkan wanita frigid. Husein menilai dasar hukum khitan wanita tidak ada dalam nash baik dari al-Qur’an maupun hadis. Praktik khitan wanita bukan syari’at Islam, melainkan mengadopsi tradisi jahiliyah yang tidak ada unsur maslahah-nya, sehingga hukumnya haram. Kedua, dalam melakukan istinbat hukum, Husein Muhammad menggunakan metode qiyas dan maslahah al-mursalah. Ketiga, Pemikiran Husein Muhammad tentang khitan wanita ditinjau dari hukum Islam adalah tidak tepat. Karena dalam syari’at Islam, sesuai petunjuk Rasulullah, khitan wanita dilakukan dengan cara mengambil selaput kulit yang menutupi klitoris, bukan mengambil klitoris. Sehingga wanita tidak akan kehilangan kenikmatan seksual ketika berhubungan biologis. Dengan terpenuhinya kebutuhan biologis antara suami istri ini maka terciptalah sebuah rumah tangga yang harmonis, sakinah, mawaddah dan rahmah.
DASAR WAJIB MEMATUHI UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN KHI Nelli Fauziah; M. Abdul Hakim
Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 November (2023): Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Studies (STAIZA)
Publisher : Tim Jurnal STAI KH. Zainuddin Ponpes Mojosari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63829/js.v1i1nov.6

Abstract

The Marriage Law (UUP) and KHI are legal products authorized by the Indonesian government. As a country of law, the Indonesian people are obliged to obey it. But in reality, there are still many people who ignore the applicable laws and assume that the UUP and KHI are only rules from the state, not sharia from Allah SWT that must be obeyed. This paper aims to prove the obligation to comply with the UUP and KHI. This research includes library research with data collection methods from primary data in the form of the UUP and KHI itself, the nash Al-Qur'an and hadith which are the basis for the obligation to obey ulil amri, then collect secondary data on related studies from books, journals, and other supporting sources. While the approach used is a socio-legal approach with data analysis methods in the form of descriptive analytics. The purpose of writing this article is to analyze the process of forming laws in Islam, UUP and KHI, parse family law issues in UUP and KHI that are different from classical fiqh, describe the urgency of legal change in the theory of law is a tool of social engineering, and describe the basis for compulsory compliance with UUP and KHI. The results of this study prove that the basis for the obligation to obey the Marriage Law and KHI is the same as the basis for the obligation to obey the Qur'an, Sunnah, and ulil amri, because both are products of government ijtihad (ulil amri). Government ijtihad is a manifestation of collective ijma', which is the result of the thoughts and agreements of leaders (umara>), scholars, Muslim jurists and scholars, practitioners and academics who are experts in their fields. So that the obligation to obey the UUP and KHI can be said not to conflict with sharia and in line with the aim of achieving the benefit of society.
Upaya Hukum Verzet terhadap Putusan Verstek M. Abdul Hakim; Nelli Fauziah
Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 Mei (2024): Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Studies (STAIZA)
Publisher : Tim Jurnal STAI KH. Zainuddin Ponpes Mojosari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63829/js.v2i1mei.14

Abstract

In the context of legal case resolution through the processes of verstek and verzet, the decision rendered in a verstek trial is considered a formal and substantive resolution of the case. The defendant who loses in such a trial is not granted the right to refile the case unless they choose to file an objection or verzet. Legal guidelines related to the verzet procedure can be found in Article 129 HIR/153 R.Bg and Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 9 of 1964, which provide explanations regarding various interpretations of verstek. The right to file an objection (verzet) is granted to the defendant or their legal representative, who must have been granted special power of attorney in accordance with Article 123 HIR/147 R.Bg and Article 125 HIR/149 R.Bg. Once a verzet is filed, the judicial process involves a panel of judges who will re-examine the case, summoning all parties involved in the verzet to provide clarification and relevant evidence. In the specific context described, the husband acts as the party filing the objection against the verzet, while the wife is the party objected to, and both are summoned according to applicable legal procedures. This entire process reflects the judiciary's effort to ensure justice and legal certainty in resolving disputes between the involved parties.