Roviin Roviin
Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Salatiga

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

al-Masa’il al-Nahwiyyah (Dirasah Taqabuliyyah Baina Madrasah al-Bashrah wa al-Kufah) Roviin Roviin
Jurnal Alsinatuna Vol 3 No 2 (2018): June 2018
Publisher : Arabic Education Program IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/alsinatuna.v3i2.1247

Abstract

When Islam spread to the Arabian Peninsula, the Arabs were also scattered, communicating with non-Arabs and mixing with each other. As a result, a new generation emerged that could not preserve the authenticity of its language. Therefore, the Arabs became distorted from the authenticity of their language. The emergence of many of these irregularities led to the need to preserve the originality of the Arabic language, and Abu al-Aswad al-Duwali was the first who establish Arabic grammar on the orders of Caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib. After Abu al-Aswad al-Duwali, emerging famous grammars were divided into madrasa of Bashra and Kufa, each madrasa had characteristics and differences. The differences between these two madrasas is enormous and in many cases. The prominent difference is that the madrasa of Bashra is more stringent in Arabic grammar, while the madrasa of Kufa is looser.
BINĀ’ AL NAZHARIYAH AL LUGHAWIYYAH FÎ AL TURAST AL ‘ARABIY WA TAQWÎMUHĀ Roviin Roviin
Al Mi'yar: Jurnal Ilmiah Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Vol 3 No. 2 Oktober 2020
Publisher : STIQ Amuntai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (662.05 KB) | DOI: 10.35931/am.v3i2.235

Abstract

Indeed humans live in a specific environment and receive the language of this environment by acquiring it with a certainty of its vocal, grammatical, and semantic, as well as with knowledge of social rules in understanding and producing speech. Although linguists agree on this fact in language acquisition, they differ in their views on the acquisition process. Every opinion is based on a theory towards the nature of language. This research aims to explain and evaluate the linguistic theory in Arabic heritage. The researcher reads deeply the references, After a comprehensive understanding is formed on the object of the research, the researcher analyzes and realizes this information. The results of this research indicate that the Arabic heritage took place in the various theories presented by Arab linguists, namely “analysis” and “classification”. The various assumptions and theories used by the Arab linguistic heritage to classify the language and to describe it can be combined in an interference group of circles representing the general structure of the linguistic classification theory, as the various assumptions define and visualize their location from each other. So, the Arabic lesson needs to be reviewed and described as taxonomic rather than a standard lesson. Keywords: Linguistic theory, Arabic Heritage, Evaluation.
al-Masa’il al-Nahwiyyah (Dirasah Taqabuliyyah Baina Madrasah al-Bashrah wa al-Kufah) Roviin Roviin
Jurnal Alsinatuna Vol 3 No 2 (2018): June 2018
Publisher : Arabic Education Program IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/alsinatuna.v3i2.1247

Abstract

When Islam spread to the Arabian Peninsula, the Arabs were also scattered, communicating with non-Arabs and mixing with each other. As a result, a new generation emerged that could not preserve the authenticity of its language. Therefore, the Arabs became distorted from the authenticity of their language. The emergence of many of these irregularities led to the need to preserve the originality of the Arabic language, and Abu al-Aswad al-Duwali was the first who establish Arabic grammar on the orders of Caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib. After Abu al-Aswad al-Duwali, emerging famous grammars were divided into madrasa of Bashra and Kufa, each madrasa had characteristics and differences. The differences between these two madrasas is enormous and in many cases. The prominent difference is that the madrasa of Bashra is more stringent in Arabic grammar, while the madrasa of Kufa is looser.