Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts) Indonesian TESOL Journal
Sitti Syakira
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Siliwangi
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts)

 1 
An Analysis of Learners’ Oral Errors: A Study in One-to-one EFL Classroom Interaction Sitti Syakira; Murni Mahmud; Sahril Sahril
TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts) Vol 5, No 2 (2021): TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts)
Publisher : Siliwangi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37058/tlemc.v5i2.3937

Abstract

Correcting the repeated errors produced by the learners is one of the most frustrating things to do by teachers. However, it is natural for the students to commit errors while learning since it can be a sign of improving language competence and as a facilitating factor in second language learning (Atmaca, 2016). This study aims to find out the types and frequency of learners’ oral error occurrence during the teaching and learning process in one-to-one EFL classroom interaction. This research applied descriptive qualitative research with case study design. Two adult learners, who had the same English proficiency level, were chosen as research participants through purposive sampling in Amsterdam Institute, an informal school applying tailor-made system in the teaching and learning process. The data were collected through observation during teaching and learning process, and analyzed based on data analysis procedures consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The results revealed that all types of errors proposed in this research appeared during the observation and data analysis. Grammatical error dominated the error type, and lexical error was the least error type produced by the learners. Unsolicited use of L1 is excluded from the discussion of the result finding since it is not a part of the error type studied (Lyster, 1998). Furthermore, another finding indicates that the error committed by the learners continuously appeared in the next meeting the researcher observed. Therefore, it is suggested that the teacher should provide more triggers as an attraction for the learners’ intention so that they can figure out more about their errors, and engage the learners to provide themselves self-correction or self-repair by prompting them.
Initiation-Response-Feedback Pattern Used by Lecturer-Students in EFL Classroom Interaction Kartini Kartini; Sitti Syakira; Sitti Aisyah
TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts) Vol 6, No 1 (2022): TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts)
Publisher : Siliwangi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37058/tlemc.v6i1.5144

Abstract

Applying a descriptive qualitative method with case study design, this research aimed at finding and describing how initiation-response-feedback take place in classroom interaction. The data collection was done through observation conducted in two classes of the third-year students of English Education Department in one of the state universities in Makassar. The observation was conducted three times in each class. Analyzed using discourse analysis, the results show that in term of initiation, four subclasses were used by the lecturer namely requestives,descriptives, elicitation, and informatives. In term of students’ responding act, students used three subclasses features namely positive responding act, negative responding act, and temporization. As for follow-up, the lecturer used three subclasses features namely endorsement, concession, and acknowledgment. This research also found that acknowledgment was used to repair and accept with repair student’s response. Classroom interaction took place by using subclasses of head act. The lecturer uttered initiation based on the function of each subclasses. That was similar to how students’ responding act took place which was based on lecturer initiation. Furthermore, the lecturer responded students’ in many ways based on the responding act. Hence, it should be pointed out that a turn can be made up not only of a single move, but also of two moves: it can be either a combination of a responding and an initiating move, or a follow-up and an initiating move. However, initiation moves, response moves and follow-up moves cannot be separated each other since it was three-part exchange in classroom interaction. Keywords: Initiation-Response-Feedback, Lecturer’s Initiation and Feedback, Students’ Response, EFL Classroom Interaction  
Co-Authors Astriani, Aveny Septi Dea Silvani Kartini Kartini Murni Mahmud Sahril Nur Sari Khairinisa Siti Ratna Ningsih Sitti Aisyah Yunianto, Andi Eka