Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies MILLATI: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities
Mubasirun Mubasirun
IAIN Salatiga
Religion Arts Humanities Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Values of tepo seliro in Bakri Syahid’s Tafsir al-Huda and Bisri Mustofa’s Tafsir al-Ibriz Mubasirun Mubasirun
Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
Publisher : IAIN Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/ijims.v11i2.351376

Abstract

Tafsir al-Huda  and Tafsir al-Ibriz are religious narratives containing Javanese cultural values that aspire to live in peace and harmony. One of the means for achieving such aspiration is Tepo Seliro, which embodies values of tolerance, mutual respect, accepting differences, not blaming others, and not imposing one’s will on others. The current study aims to reveal the Javanese cultural values of Tepo Seliro in Tafsir al-Huda and al-Ibriz. The method of analysis used in the present research was content analysis with Gadamer’s hermeneutic approach, which is of the view that the reading and understanding of a text are essentially a dialog between the text, the author, and the world of the readers. The study results indicate that the lofty values inherent within the culture of Tepo Seliro are found in the al-Huda and al-Ibriz Quranic exegeses. Tafsir al-Huda tends to be more contextual in its elaborations of Tepo Seliro values, while Bisri Mustofa in Tafsir al-Ibriz frequently used terminologies that are less precise to indicate their true meanings.
Moderation in the Method of Qur’an Interpretation Mubasirun Mubasirun
Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Trends of Islamic Thought, Literature, and History on The Changing World Order (
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/mlt.v5i2.%p

Abstract

There are two methods of interpretation of the al-Qur’an, the classical interpretive method and the modern exegetical method. The classical method of interpretation is text-oriented and ignores context. Meanwhile, the modern method of interpretation relies on the strength of context to find definite meanings that can answer contemporary problems. Each of the two methods of interpretation has fanatical supporters favoring one side and managing the other. Existing studies related to the problem of the method of interpreting the Qur’an revolved around three objects, namely the support orientation of one of the methods of interpretation and a comparison between the two methods. The author’s study is to find a middle way whose ending solves the conflict between the two methods. This study finds common ground between the two methods of interpretation which its proponents contend with. The meeting point referred to is to take the middle path position in the various terms of the approach to the interpretation of the verses of the Qur’an, namely the middle path between textual and contextualist, between qath’i and dhanny, between ushul and furu’.
Co-Authors