Robitul Firdaus
International Islamic Universiti Malaysia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Konsep Maslahat di Tengah Budaya Hukum Indonesia Firdaus, Robitul
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1558.818 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v5i1.646

Abstract

Maslahat is one of the approaches which is usually used by Indonesian moslem scholars to solve gap problems between Islam and world development. It also causes many contradictions amongst them, however, because of its flexibility. some scholars use maslahat without clear boundaries and apply it as a free method. The writer tries to give a solution about this problem, especially when maslahat faces the culture of Indonesian law system. Maslahat has universal characteristic. Therefore, it should be acceptable and applicable in universal ways. In Indonesian context, maslahat must be formalized and institutionalized in Indonesian law system if it will be applied as universal value in the middle of Indonesian society. Consequently, if there is a conflict amongst several applications from maslahat, Indonesian law system could have the right to determine the truth.
PERAN INSIST (INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND CIVILIZATION) DALAM PENYEBARAN GAGASAN ISLAMISASI ILMU PENGETAHUAN DI INDONESIA Firdaus, Robitul
AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 18 No 1 (2013): Integrasi Islam dan Sains
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menyelidiki peran Institut Studi Pemikiran dan Budaya Islam dalam menyebarkan dan melaksanakan pemikiran-pemikiran Islamisasi wawasan manusia di Indonesia dan mengamati model INSISTS dalam konteks Indonesia. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ide islamisasi wawasan manusia yang diterapkan dan disebarkan oleh INSIST sangat dipengaruhi oleh penjelasan filosofis Al-Attas tentang “Islamisasi” yaitu “dewesternisasi” atau “desekularisasi”. Untuk menyebarkan pemikirannya, INSISTS menggunakan beberapa media, yaitu (1) menerbitkan jurnal pemikiran Islam; (2) mengadakan seminar, training dan workshop tentang pandangan dunia Islam; (3) bekerjasama dengan Koran-koran harian seperti Republika; dan meluncurkan website resmi.The aim of this article is to examine and investigate the role of the Institute for the Study of Islamic Thought and Civilization (the INSISTS) in marketting and implementing the idea of Islamization of human knowledge in Indonesia as well as to observe the model of the INSISTS‟ Islamization in the Indonesian context. As a result, it can be concluded that the idea of Islamization of human knowledge implemented and promoted by the INSISTS largely be influenced by the Al-Attas‟ philosophical explanation of “Islamization”, namely “de- westernization” or “de-secularization”. In order to spread its ideas, there are several media used by the INSISTS, namely (1) publishing journal on Islamic thought; (2) organizing seminar, training and workshop on Islamic Worldview; (3) collaboration with the daily newspaper, Republika; and (4) launching the official website.
NASIONALISME ‘JALAN TENGAH’: MENGURAI POTENSI BENTURAN IDEOLOGI NASIONALISME DAN SENTIMEN UMMAH DI ERA NATION STATE Firdaus, Robitul
AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 23 No 2 (2018): Islam, Kenegaraan, dan Kebangsaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/akademika.v23i2.1105

Abstract

Abstract In the study of Islamic political thought, the relation between Islam and nationalism has been a relevant topic to be discussed. This is at least due to two factors. Firstly, there is a concept of ummah in Islam which is considered in contrary with the ideology of nationalism. While ummah is characterized with the solidarity in the name of faith, nationalism is of nationality and geographical borders. Secondly, nationalism and nation state have become a reality accepted by all modern states, including Muslim states. Accordingly, it is assumed that being a loyal Muslim and a good citizen at the same time is impossible. This article is aimed at offering an interface between nationalism and ummah by adopting the positive sides of both. To place nationalism and ummah in a binary opposition is not useful and against the reality. As a result, it is concluded that nationalism can be an asset to achieve the unity and cooperation, particularly in the struggle for independence. However, nationalism can also be a narrow ideology which leads to the negative fanaticism. In this context, the sentiment of ummah can be used as a religious guidance in minimazing and preventing the practice of narrow nationalism. The concept of ummah ensures that a religious bond should be respected besides the bond which is based on the territorial border. On the other hand, nationalism could prevent the sentiment of ummah from falling to religious extremism. Finally, the interface between nationalism and ummah may be applied differently among various Muslim countries. Keywords: Nationalism, Ummah, and Nation State. Abstrak Dalam studi pemikiran politik Islam, relasi antara Islam dan nasionalisme menjadi topik yang masih menarik untuk didiskusikan. Hal ini setidaknya disebabkan oleh dua hal: Pertama, terdapat konsep ummah dalam doktrin Islam yang diyakini berseberangan dengan ide nasionalisme. Ummah meniscayakan solidaritas atas dasar keimanan, sedang nasionalisme mendasarkan pada faktor kebangsaan dan batasan geografis. Kedua, nasionalisme dan negara bangsa merupakan realitas yang dipraktekkan di semua negara modern, termasuk negara-negara Muslim. Sehingga timbul anggapan bahwa tidak mungkin seorang Muslim yang baik dapat sekaligus menjadi warga negara yang baik. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan titik temu antara konsep nasionalisme dan ummah dengan mengambil sisi positif dari keduanya. Meletakkan nasionalisme dan ummah dalam posisi yang bertentangan selain tidak produktif juga bertentangan dengan realitas yang ada. Hasil studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa nasionalisme dapat menjadi modal dalam menuju persatuan dan kerja sama, terutama kaitannya dalam perjuangan kemerdekaan. Meskipun, nasionalisme di sisi lain juga dapat menjadi ideologi sempit yang mengarah pada fanatisme negatif. Di sinilah, sentimen ummah dapat digunakan untuk menjadi panduan agama dalam meminimalisasi dan mencegah praktek nasionalisme sempit. Konsep ummah memastikan bahwa terdapat ikatan keagamaan yang harus dihormati selain ikatan berdasar batasan teritorial. Di sisi lain, nasionalisme mencegah sentimen ummah untuk terjerumus ke dalam ektrimisme agama. Akhirnya, batasan kerjasama dan titik temu antara nasionalisme dan ummah mungkin diaplikasikan berbeda-beda antara satu negara Muslim dengan yang lain. Kata Kunci: Nasionalisme, Ummah, dan Negara Bangsa.
Fiqh of International Relations in the Era of Nation State in the Perspective of the Council of Indonesian Ulama Firdaus, Robitul; Muhyiddin
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2025.15.1.30-51

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the decision of the Indonesian Ulama Council concerning the principles of international relations stipulated in the 8th Ijtima' Ulama forum in 2024. The study has three primary focuses: to scrutinize the socio-political context as the background of the MUI's decision, to examine its arguments and methodology, and to investigate the social responses to the MUI's decision. A descriptive analytical approach is used to describe and understand a phenomenon that occurs, involving causes and effects. As the findings, the study reveals that the emergence of this MUI decision responded to the Palestine-Israel conflict escalation at the end of 2023, which caused diverse policies of Muslim countries in the world. Previously, the MUI also issued a fatwa on supporting the struggle of Palestine. To support its argument, the MUI cited a series of arguments which still generally apply the qauly or textual approach. These arguments are written without adequate explanation regarding their context from istidlal or instinbath approach. Apart from that, there are debates among the public regarding the idea of boycotting pro-Israel products. The government tends to be neutral concerning the boycott campaign, while it supports the essence of the fatwa and the MUI decision to support the struggle of Palestine. This result suggests that the MUI should improve its fatwa writing design to avoid misinterpretation. Likewise, the study might have practical implications for the government to deal with such MUI’s religious thoughts.