Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Sawerigading
Ai Yeni Yuliyanti
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Readability of Articles in Journal of Religious and Socio-cultural Studies Ai Yeni Yuliyanti; Busro Busro
Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English Vol 7, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/lkw.v7i1.2218

Abstract

Although the research on the readability of particular text has been extensively undertaken, little research applied to article journals. This study attempts to analyze the readability of religious and socio-cultural articles published in the Wawasan Journal. It is crucial to analyze it to prepare the journal indexed by Scopus at the international level and Sinta 1 at the national level. This study adopted the mixed method, quantitative to count the readability score, and qualitative to describe the readability score.  Data were collected from three issues: Volume 4, no 1 (2019), Volume 4, no 2 (2019), and Volume 5, no 1 (2020) because the journal uses English in those issues. Then, a test was undertaken by use of online software https://readabilityformulas.com on the texts of each article. The readability formulas are FKGL, CLI, SMOG, ARI, and LWF. The result shows that most articles of Wawasan Journal are appropriate with the targeted readers: college, college graduate, and college graduate and above. Nevertheless, many articles are still regarded as suitable for the lower level, namely school grade level. Based on the readability score average of three issues is relatively stable. Due to FKGL, CLI, SMOG, and ARI formulas, the three issues are appropriate at college level. Meanwhile, those are appropriate with college graduates and above based on LWF. It is still found inappropriate text with targeted readers, the researchers suggest that the editorial board need to check not only its originality and grammar but also the readability score of the proposed article.
REPRESENTATION OF THE DISMISSED KPK EMPLOYEES IN THE JAKARTA POST ARTICLES (Representasi Pegawai KPK yang Diberhentikan pada Artikel The Jakarta Post) Ai Yeni Yuliyanti; Ponia Mega Septiana; Titania Sari; Busro Busro
SAWERIGADING Vol 27, No 2 (2021): SAWERIGADING, EDISI DESEMBER 2021
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Sulawesi Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1492.145 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/sawer.v27i2.921

Abstract

This qualitative study analyzes the strategy used by The Jakarta Post to represent the dismissed KPK employees in the case of their failure in the Civic test as an employment status transition within the antigraft body and its representation. The researchers use Critical Discourse Analysis specifically the Social Actor Representation (SAR) theory from Theo Van Leeuwen (2008). It is supported by Richardson's (2007) theory to analyze the text producer’s lexical choice and the transitivity theory of Halliday and Matthiessen (2004) to analyze role allocation. This study shows that The Jakarta Post represents the dismissed KPK employees' both exclusion and inclusion strategy, but inclusion is dominant. The dismissed KPK employees are represented negatively. It is shown from the lexical choice used through the words ‘dismiss’, ‘fire’, and ‘fail’ to represent them. The Jakarta Post also uses other strategies: classification and individualization and collectivism. 
Representation of 'Muslim' in Jakarta Governor Election 2017 in The Washington Post: A Critical Discourse Analysis Titania Sari; Ai Yeni Yuliyanti; Ponia Mega Septiana
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya Vol 12, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora (FIPH), Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26714/lensa.12.2.2022.249-262

Abstract

This research explores how The Washington Post online newspaper represents Muslims and non-Muslims in the Jakarta governor election in 2017. The researcher obtained the data from the article in The Washington Post on May 5, 2017. This qualitative research used Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis Theory (2003) approaches in the textual and social practice analysis dimensions. The textual analysis dimension is analyzed using Halliday's transitivity theory (2014), focusing on process type at representational meanings. The researcher collects, classifies, and explores the data. The findings show that the most apparent in the sentences of articles are mental and verbal processes, and there is no behavioral process. The result shows that the Washington Post represents Muslims primarily negatively. Muslims is represented as conflict maker and a winner in the event because of the non-Muslim candidate's offense. The Muslim society is represented as having conflict, and hard-line Muslim communities want to apply Islamic law to the Indonesian government.
Appraisal System on Twitter: An Attitudinal Analysis Toward Alleged Islamic Blasphemy Case of M Kece Ai Yeni Yuliyanti
Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Ranah: jurnal Kajian Bahasa
Publisher : Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/rnh.v12i1.5657

Abstract

This study examines the public's assessment of an Islamic blasphemy case named M. Kece on Twitter. It is a qualitative descriptive study. The data is a public assessment regarding the Islamic blasphemy case named M. Kece on Twitter using Appraisal Theory (Martin & White, 2005). Focusing on Attitudinal Analysis, the result shows the Attitudinal Analysis in social media, precisely Twitter, on the alleged Islamic blasphemy of M. Kece. Judgment is the most dominant, with as much as 54% over Affect (19%) and Appreciation (27%). In all three, more than three fourth of the data are negative. This dominant negative appraisal of netizens of Twitter users shows the public's assessment of what M. Kece has done, namely the content of his YouTube channel, which was reported and imprisoned due to a blasphemy case. This study affirmed that all content creators must be careful about the content they post. On the other hand, the viewer also must be selective about the content they access on social media not to be misleading. AbstrakStudi ini mengkaji penilaian publik terhadap kasus penistaan agama Islam bernama M. Kece di Twitter. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah penilaian publik terkait kasus penistaan agama Islam bernama M. Kece di Twitter dengan menggunakan Appraisal Theory (Martin & White, 2005). Berfokus pada Analisis Sikap, hasilnya menunjukkan Analisis Sikap di media sosial, tepatnya Twitter, tentang dugaan penistaan agama Islam terhadap M. Kece. Afeksi adalah yang paling dominan, dengan sebanyak 54% di atas judgment (19%) dan Apresiasi (27%). Dari ketiga kategori ini, lebih dari tiga perempat data merupakan penialaian negatif. Dominasi penilaian netizen pengguna Twitter ini menunjukkan penilaian mereka terhadap apa yang telah dilakukan M. Kece, yaitu konten channel YouTube-nya yang dilaporkan dan dipenjara akibat kasus penistaan agama. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa semua pembuat konten harus berhati-hati dengan konten yang mereka posting. Di sisi lain, penonton juga harus selektif terhadap konten yang mereka akses di media sosial agar tidak menyesatkan.
Co-Authors Busro, B. Ponia Mega Septiana Ponia Mega Septiana Titania Sari