Ruddy Syafruddin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMODELAN RESPON OPTIMAL KEBIJAKAN MONETER TERHADAP STABILITAS SEKTOR PERUMAHAN DAN INFLASI DI INDONESIA Ryan Juminta Anward; Handry Imansyah; Syahrituah Siregar; Ruddy Syafruddin
At-Taradhi Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Vol 8, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Islamic Economics and Business Faculty of UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/at-taradhi.v8i1.1518

Abstract

Pengalaman krisis keuangan global yang telah terjadi menunjukkan kebijakan moneter perlu untuk memperluas tujuannya, yakni tidak hanya terpaku terhadap tujuan tradisional kebijakan moneter (inflasi) namun juga memperhatikan harga asset. Struktural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) dengan restriksi jangka pendek digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk mengidentifikasi respon dan dampak kebijakan moneter terhadap harga perumahan dan inflasi termasuk juga variabel makro ekonomi lainnya (output dan nilai tukar) di Indonesia. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data triwulan selama periode 2001Q1-2005Q4. Hasil simulasi dari model SVAR menunjukkan suku bunga kebijakan (BI Rate) berdampak signifikan terhadap harga perumahan dan tingkat inflasi. Kebijakan moneter yang dilakukan melalui perubahan BI Rate merespon secara cepat terhadap shock inflasi, output dan nilai tukar namun tidak memberikan respon terhadap fluktuasi harga perumahan. Model yang dikembangkan dalam penelitian ini juga mengindikasikan kurang efektifnya transmisi kebijakan moneter di Indonesia.Kata kunci: kebijakan moneter, harga perumahan, structural VAR
ANALISIS PRIORITAS BELANJA DESA PADA DANA DESA KAYU BAWANG KABUPATEN BANJAR Rakhmatullah Rakhmatullah; Ruddy Syafruddin
JIEP: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 3, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : PPJP Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/jiep.v3i1.2212

Abstract

The aims of this research are to(1) find out the village expenditure in the Kayu Bawang village fund in Banjar Regency, and (2) find out the priority of village spending on the right village fund in developing Kayu Bawang Village, Banjar Regency.The Respondents in this study were 6 respondents who were considered influential in determining village spending in Kayu Bawang Village which was used in data processing by using AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process).The results of this study indicate that the alternative criteria for RPJMDes, Village Potential and Village Problems influence the determination of village expenditure priorities in the order of preference value of 54% RPJMDes, 30% Village Problems and 16% Village Potential. Based on these alternative criteria, the preference for village development priorities is 42%, community empowerment is 32%, community development is 20%, and village administration is 6%. With the most dominant conclusion, village development is 42%.Keywords:Priority, Village Expenditure, Village Government Organizers, Village   Development, Community Empowerment, Community Development, AHP ((Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method.
Analisis Prioritas Belanja Desa Pada Dana Desa Kayu Bawang Kabupaten Banjar Rakhmatullah; Ruddy Syafruddin
JIEP: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : PPJP ULM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to (1) find out the village expenditure in the Kayu Bawangvillage fund in Banjar Regency, and (2) find out the priority of village spending on theright village fund in developing Kayu Bawang Village, Banjar Regency.The Respondents in this study were six respondents who were consideredinfluential in determining village spending in Kayu Bawang Village, which was used indata processing by using AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process).This study's results indicate that the alternative criteria for RPJMDes, VillagePotential, and Village Problems influence the determination of village expenditurepriorities in the order of preference value of 54% RPJMDes, 30% Village Problems,and 16% Village Potential. Based on these alternative criteria, the preference forvillage development priorities is 42%, community empowerment is 32%, communitydevelopment is 20%, and village administration is 6%. With the most dominantconclusion, village development is 42%.