Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DEDIKASI JURNAL MAHASISWA Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Denny Ardian Priambodo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERJANJIAN JUAL-BELI TENAGA LISTRIK ANTARA PT PLN DENGAN PELANGGAN Denny Ardian Priambodo
Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 6, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractIncreasingly diverse electricity needs make the government obliged to make proper arrangements in the implementation of electrical energy distribution, so the government needs to appoint a State-Owned Enterprise (BUMN) named PT. The State Electricity Company which is often referred to as PT. PLN (Persero). PT PLN (Persero) as the electricity manager appointed by the government continues to improve in providing services to the community until now PLN continues to strive to meet people's needs for electricity by issuing various existing electrical service products, it is hoped that the need for electrical energy in Indonesia can be fulfilled to the maximum. maybe. Problems that occur in subscribing to electricity, both technically and administratively, are most often carried out by the community through the services of third parties (installers registered with PLN and installers who are not registered with PLN), because they want to get fast service. As a result, in addition to the high costs due to installers asking for additional services, people are also often victims because the expected fast service is also not fulfilled and there is a lot of public electricity supply that is not registered or not officially at PLN (Illegal). In practice, PT PLN as a provider of electricity in accordance with the mandate of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection is obliged to provide clear information on traded goods or services.
THE PARADOX OF CHILD SENTENCING IN MURDER CASES: CRITIQUING THE 'BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD' PRINCIPLE IN INDONESIAN COURTS. Denny Ardian Priambodo; Nurini Aprilianda; Milda Istiqomah
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal offenses are no longer committed only by adults, but also by children, along with the development of technology and social dynamics. Indonesia, through Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, provides protection for children in conflict with the law. However, in practice there are still court decisions considered not to have fully applied the principle of the best interests of the child, such as the decision of the Penajam District Court imposing a 20-year sentence and the Lamongan District Court imposing an 11-year sentence. This research is a normative juridical study using a statutory and conceptual approach through library research. The results show that: (1) judges’ considerations are based on both juridical and non-juridical aspects; (2) the application of the best interests of the child principle has not been consistent and has not been fully oriented toward social reintegration; (3) sentencing that is not in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law has the potential to damage the child’s future and hinder the fulfillment of the child’s rights, in line with Arif Gosita’s concept of child protection. By examining these two decisions, it becomes important to emphasize that it is recommended to optimize restorative justice, improve the quality of guidance and rehabilitation in Juvenile Development Institutions and Correctional Centers, and strengthen inter-agency collaboration, including the active involvement of child psychologists in court proceedings.
Co-Authors Milda Istiqomah Nurini Aprilianda