Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

PARALEGALS AND HUMANITARIAN RESPONSIBILITIES IN ADVOCATING SURVIVORS OF THE MOST SERIOUS CRIMES: LEARNING FROM WOMEN VOLUNTEERS FOR HUMANITY IN NORTH ACEH DISTRICT Moh. Fadhil
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v8i1.21236

Abstract

The most serious crimes that occurred in North Aceh left a deep scar for the victims. The birth of impunity causes victims to be naturally forced to survive. However, various fundamental rights that are difficult to access are a significant problem for survivors due to post-conflict trauma, making it difficult for survivors to open up to the local government. Therefore, the Women Volunteer Advocacy Institute for Humanity (RPuK) is here to bridge the fundamental rights needs of survivors with advocacy to local governments. This study aimed to determine the existence of RPuK in accommodating the fundamental rights of survivors. The method used is empirical legal research with interview and observation techniques. The study results reveal that the existence of RPuK for ten years in North Aceh Regency has built a unique advocacy program with the Regional Government in terms of fulfilling integrated service programs and unique service bazaars for survivors of the most serious crimes. Both programs focus on making identity cards, health insurance cards, marriage certificates, service mental health, employment assistance, and other fundamental rights. This success is a form of reparations as part of the fulfillment of transitional justice to the survivors. Interestingly, RPuK made a breakthrough in its food security advocacy program for the survivors during the pandemic. Thus, RPuK sees a new perspective that is far more important, prioritizing the survivors during the pandemic, fulfilling the survivors' economic, social, and cultural rights to fulfill human rights and transitional justice.
Problematika Pemeriksaan Terdakwa di Pengadilan Tanpa Dampingan Penasehat Hukum Moh. Fadhil; Mochammad Imam Ghiffary
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v4i2.589

Abstract

Prinsip Miranda Rules merupakan prinsip fundamental yang imperatif sifatnya di dalam prosedur peradilan pidana. Prinsip tersebut melekat pada hak-hak tersangka atau terdakwa sebagai bagian dari manusia seutuhnya. Salah satu yang menjadi bagian dari prinsip tersebut adalah adanya hak tersangka atau terdakwa untuk didampingi oleh penasehat hukum yang dibarengi dengan kewajiban penegak hukum untuk menyediakan akses bantuan hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 56 KUHAP. Namun, implementasi pasal 56 KUHAP belum sepenuhnya ditegakkan. Salah satunya di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa melalui Putusan Nomor 03/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sgm yang di dalamnya menyebutkan bahwa terdakwa tidak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum. oleh karena itu penelitian ini ingin mengungkapkan problematika terdakwa di dalam putusan tersebut tidak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum selama proses persidangan berlangsung. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga ingin mengungkap faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terdakwa tidak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum. Metode yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah penggabungan antara penelitian yuridis normatif dan penelitian yuridis empiris. Sifat penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dengan menganalisisnya secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa terdakwa berdasarkan perkara a quo tidak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum dikarenakan terdakwa menolak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum sehingga Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa merasa kewajiban Pasal 56 KUHAP menjadi gugur. Adapun faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keadaan terdakwa tidak didampingi oleh penasehat hukum adalah terbitnya SP2DPH sejak saat penyidikan berlangsung, pemahaman konotatif terdakwa mengenai penasehat hukum, kekuatan daya mengikat norma di dalam Pasal 56 KUHAP rendah, kurangnya koordinasi antara Pengadilan dengan Posbakum, pandangan aparat penegak hukum yang masih memandang inferior profesi advokat.
PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, INTERNALISASI NILAI-NILAI ANTI KORUPSI DAN PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Moh. Fadhil
Journal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education Vol 2, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : IAIN Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (254.895 KB) | DOI: 10.24260/jrtie.v2i1.1229

Abstract

This paper will discuss Islamic Religious Education and internalization of anti-corruption values as the effort to prevent corruption. The effort to overcome corruption crime not only with prosecution and eradication, but also with prevention efforts. One of the prevention efforts is education. Therefore, it needs anti-corruption education model as the resistence efforts toward corruptive behavior and to internalize the value of morality. It has to do literatively to build anti-corruption view. The aim of this paper is to understand integration of anti-corruption values in Islamic Religious Education model. Furthermore, this paper also discusses transformation of Islamic Religious Education that integrating anti-corruption values as the prevention efforts of widespread corruptive behavior and to increase corruption perception index. In this case, Islamic Religious Education must be able to make a methodological transformation in terms of cognitive anti-corruption literacy in each learning activity to all those learners. Furthermore, by building an analysis of social symptoms and public issues with a research approach, it must be able to build public morality. The success of the concept will be able to internalize anti-corruption values and to increase corruption perception index in the world.
Urgency of the Harmonization of Interception Regulation in the Context of Law Enforcement Moh. Fadhil
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.75

Abstract

Systems regarding the legal remedy of communication interception can be found in several regulations. However, those systems are not supported by horizontal harmonization since each regulation governs the mechanism differently, so there is a disparity among interception regulation. This paper analyzes the harmonization of wiretapping regulations in Indonesia from a law enforcement perspective with an inventory of regulations governing the current mechanism of interception. The results concluded that first, the disparity in intercepting authority of communication interception practice regulated by several institutions in the same form of crime eradication authority must be reformulated to restore overlapping regulations. Secondly, the interception regulation as a coercive force that derogates the right to privacy must contain detailed provisions in terms of a permit request and the wiretapping authority. The permit application must contain the purpose of the request for wiretapping permission descriptively. Moreover, these provisions must explicitly regulate legal subjects that are authorized to conduct wiretapping practice in the form of clear mechanisms and coordination with the direct superiors and court supervision regulating the interception procedure as well as the cooperation between law enforcement officials and telecommunications service providers. Third, prospectively interception regulations can be assessed from the political will of the legislators. The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 5/PUU-VIII/2010 mandates the need for horizontal harmonization of interception regulations in the form of the Interception Bill, which is also included in the 2019 National Legislation Program.
AMNESTI DAN KESETARAAN GENDER DI INDONESIA: TELAAH TERHADAP PEMBERIAN AMNESTI PRESIDEN JOKOWI KEPADA BAIQ NURIL Moh. Fadhil
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v9i2.2924

Abstract

Dalam pandangan feminist jurisprudence, hukum merupakan produk ketidakadilan dan bentuk dominasi negara terhadap kaum perempuan, salah satu contoh adalah kasus yang menjerat Baiq Nuril. Berdasarkan pertimbangan kemanusiaan, Presiden Jokowi memberikan amnesti kepada Baiq Nuril sebagai bentuk pemenuhan keadilan demi melawan ketidakadilan yang ditimbulkan oleh aturan hukum yang timpang. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menelaah pemberian amnesti kepada Baiq Nuril sebagai respon pemenuhan keadilan gender di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yang bertujuan untuk menelaah kebijakan yang dibuat oleh negara dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa pemberian amnesti merupakan sebuah terobosan hukum demi memenuhi keadilan gender dan menerobos aturan hukum yang kaku dan bias gender. Amnesti secara implisit mengirimkan pesan yuridis bagi pemerintah agar segera mereformulasi UU ITE dan berbagai macam regulasi yang bias gender. Kebijakan kriminal perlu melakukan penataan secara holistik, khususnya membangun jaminan dan akses perlindungan yang tepat kepada perempuan yang berhadapan dengan hukum.