Agni Grandita Permata Sari
Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa Menggunakan Interpretive Structural Modelling Agni Grandita Permata Sari
TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan-Volume 13 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jtp.v13i1.1555

Abstract

The Central Government and West Java Province are intensively issuing policies to increase village empowerment, especially since village funds were distributed in 2015. Although these funds have positive implications for increasing the number of BUMDes, in general, the impact of BUMDes has not been too significant for the increase of the village's original income (PADes). West Java Province as a province that is very aggressively launching programs for villages development does not have BUMDes with ‘Big’ and ‘Advanced’ status, and only one with ‘Mature’ status, namely BUMDes Niagara in Bandung Regency. This paper aims to know the management, to identify and to analyze the most influential actors, supporting and inhibiting factors, and the changes expected to improve the management of BUMDes Niagara in Bandung Regency. The method used is qualitative with an inductive approach. Data analysis used the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method. The results showed that the management of BUMDes Niagara was elitist in that the village head and BUMDes manager played a major role in the development of BUMDes. Furthermore, the constraint analysis shows that the low quality of human resources is the most dominant problem. On the other hand, the factor of village potential and the commitment of the village head are the supporting factors that are most decisive. The above conditions converge on the need for the involvement of other parties, especially the government in providing guidance and assistance to Niagara BUMDes.
Penerapan Good Corporate Governance pada Badan Usaha Milik Desa di Provinsi Jawa Barat Agni Grandita Permata Sari
Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah Vol 13 No 2 (2021): Kebijakan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jiapd.v13i2.2249

Abstract

Village-Owned Enterprise (BUMDes) is an important component to improve the village economy. The number of stimulus programs that have been delivered by the government has not been able to make BUMDes in West Java into the category of ‘advanced’ and ‘large’. The majority of BUMDes in West Java are in the category of ‘pioneer’ and there are only a few BUMDes that are in the ‘growing’ category. For the ‘mature’ category, there is only one BUMDes, namely Niagara BUMDes in Wangisaraga Village, Majalaya District in Bandung Regency. The purpose of this study is to see the implementation of the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in managing BUMDes in West Java Province. This research was conducted on three BUMDes spread over three regencies/cities in West Java Province, namely Bandung Regency, West Bandung Regency and Banjar City which represent BUMDes in the category of pioneering, growing and mature. The analysis is conducted using the concept of GCG. This study uses a qualitative method with an inductive approach. This study shows that the implementation of GCG includes the principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence, and fairness is still weak. In the first principle, transparency is only fulfilled by the existence of financial reports, meanwhile BUMDes does not have standards and targets for financial dan performance reports. Then, in the second principle, accountability is only limited to determining the details of the duties and responsibilities of its structures and does not yet have and implement other indicators. Furthermore, in the third principle, the responsibility of BUMDes has not been seen from the fulfillment of social responsibilities in accordance with what is mandated in the AD/ART BUMDes. Meanwhile, in the fourth principle, independence does not work with the discovery of several forms of village head intervention, namely in the placement of employees. Finally, in the fifth principle, it was found that the implementation of the principle of Fairness to each BUMDes was quite good, marked by the inclusiveness of decision making. However, what is noted is the employee recruitment process which still contains elements of nepotism from the village head.