Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen)
Meisa Fitri Nasution
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Labuhanbatu, Sumatera Utara
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
LANGUAGE IMPOLITENESS IN JAKARTA LAWYERS CLUB TALK SHOW 2014 Meisa Fitri Nasution
ECOBISMA (JURNAL EKONOMI, BISNIS DAN MANAJEMEN) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): ECOBISMA
Publisher : Published by the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Labuhanbatu, North Sumat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (431.955 KB) | DOI: 10.36987/ecobi.v4i2.89

Abstract

The objectives of this descriptive qualitative study were to discover: (1) the types of impoliteness strategy, (2) types of attacks, and (3) how the responses to the impolite attack in Jakarta Lawyers Club (JLC) Talk Show on TVOne. The source of data were the participants’ utterances in JLC Talk Show from the topics of Talk Show namely Badai Demokrat Menerjang Kemana–Mana, Anas Siap Digantungdi Monas, and Dibalik Bungkamnya Nazaruddin in order to find out therecurrences and the pattern of the data based on the problem of the study. The data were identified, analyzed and categorized based on Culpeper’s (1996) theory. The findings of the study shows that: 1) there were four types of impoliteness strategies appeared in JLC Talk Show, namely Bald On Record Impoliteness (37.5%), Positive Impoliteness (27.5%), Negative Impoliteness (25.0%), and Sarcasm (10%), 2) there were two types of attacks appeared in JLC Talk Show namely Attacks on Quality Face (92.5%) and Attacks on Social Identity Face (7.5%), and 3) in responding to the impolite attacks, there were three ways appeared in JLC Talk Show namely not responding (52.5%), countering defensively (32.5%), and countering offensively (15.0%). The findings shows that JLC Talk Show was a formal context of Talk Show in which its participants were educated people who mostly use a direct strategy of impoliteness (Bald On Record Impoliteness) in attacking on the other participants’ personal quality (Quality Face) but the attacks dominantly were not responded by them. Therefore, it can be concluded that in communication, everyone may convey his or her opinions, arguments, and feelings but he or she should express the good attitude to communicate. Some suggestions are directed to those who are interested in understanding impoliteness strategy as found in practice.
POWER OF LANGUAGE IN EDUCATION Meisa Fitri Nasution
ECOBISMA (JURNAL EKONOMI, BISNIS DAN MANAJEMEN) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): ECOBISMA
Publisher : Published by the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Labuhanbatu, North Sumat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.681 KB) | DOI: 10.36987/ecobi.v5i1.76

Abstract

When we speak or write, we “tailor” what we say to fit the particular situation in which we are communicating and, at the same time, how we speak or write creates that very situation. We fit our language to a situation or context that ourlanguage, in turn, helped to create in the first place’ (Gee, 1999: 11). Furthermore, it seems that we always build and rebuild reality not just by dint of the language we employ but through language as discourse, i.e., language used in tandem with non-linguistic cues and symbol systems, tools, actions, interactions, technologies, and particular ways of thinking, feeling, or believing (ibid.). In looking at how power is exercised through language, the capability to refer to real examples that is found, and explained texts. But have a theoretical approach that will enable to interpret language data is presented with in an exam. Among other things, one should look at pragmatics and speech act theory, lexis and semantics (forms and meanings), forms that include or exclude (insiders or outsiders), structures (at phrase, clause and discourse level), forms of address, phatic tokens, as well as structural features of speech, which may be used to exercise or establish power. And in some contexts, one will need to be able to show how rhetorical devices are used to influence an audience
Co-Authors