Priskila Lambasa Septuagesima Siregar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN SENGKETA MEREK TERKENAL TERHADAP BARANG TIDAK SEJENIS MENURUT PASAL 6 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MEREK (studi putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 29 PK /Pdt.sus-HKI/2016) Priskila Lambasa Septuagesima Siregar
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2017
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Priskila Lambasa Septuagesima Siregar, Dr.Bambang Winarno S.H., M.S., M.Zairul Alam, S.H., M.H. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Email: priskilajesus95@gmail.com   ABSTRAK Dalam skripsi ini, penulis mengangkat isu hukum yang dilatarbelakangi oleh permasalahan yang terjadi karena adanya sengketa merek terkenal terhadap barang tidak sejenis . Berdasar dari ketentuan pasal 6 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 menjelaskan bahwa permohonan harus itolak oleh Direktorat Jendral apabila merek tersebut mempunyai persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya dengan Merek yang sudah terkenal milik pihak lain untuk barang dan/atau jasa tidak sejenis sepanjang memenuhi persyaratan tertentu yang akan ditetapkan lebih lanjut dengan Peraturan Pemerintah. Salah satu permasalahan yang timbul yaitu ketika merek “BMW” yang merupakan merek terkenal yang berasal dari Jerman yang berhasil tidak diterimanya putusan gugatan pembatalan merek pada peninjauan kembali di Mahkamah Agung yang melawan pihak BMW Body Man Wear milik Hendrywo Yuwijiyo yang merupakan perusahaan lokal yang berasal dari Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisa dan membandingkan dengan negara lain yaitu jerman sebagai negara asal merek terkenal “BMW” dan negara Singapura sebagai negara yang maju dalam industri perdagangan. Dalam penelitian ini sistem hukum yang dijadikan perbandingan mengenai penghapusan merek adalah undang-undang merek dengan European Union Trademark Regulation dan Singapore Trade Mark Act. Kata kunci: Merek, Merek Terkenal, Barang dan Jasa Tidak Sejenis, European Union Trademark Regulation, Singapura Trade Mark Act, BMW  ABSTRACT This study discussed legal issue that was triggered by the dispute of famous brand toward the non-similar goods. According to the certain art. 6, ver. 2 Act number 15, 2001 explaining that the claim must be rejected by the General Department if the brand is do have some similarity in fundamental view or in the full view with the well known trademark that owned by the other side for either product or merit as long as it is follows the certain rules and regulations that determined further with the Government Set of Rules. One of the problems that appeared is when the well known trademark “BMW” form Germany that successfully the verdict claim got rejected the Supreme Court against the side of BMW “Body Man Wear” owned by Hendrywo Yuwijoyo, a local corporation originated in Indonesia. This research is done by the analyzing and comparing to the other countries like Germany, who is the main orgin of the well known brand “BMW” and Singapore as a developed country in industrial business. In this research the law system that will be compared for the sake of brand removal will be Branding Regulation with European Union Trademark Regulation and Singapore Trade Mark Act. Keywords: Trademark, Well Known trademark, diverge kind of product or merit, European Union Trademark Regulation, Singapura Trade Mark Act, BMW
MISAPPLICATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION RULES IN INDONESIAN LOCAL PRODUCTS: Penyalahgunaan Implementasi Aturan Indikasi Geografis Dalam Produk Lokal Indonesia Siregar, Raja Koresy Melkisedek; Priskila Lambasa Septuagesima Siregar; Raja Yosia Manahan Trinitas Siregar
Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Vol 8 No 2 (2024): SANTHET: (JURNAL SEJARAH, PENDIDIKAN DAN HUMANIORA) 
Publisher : Proram studi pendidikan Sejarah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4495

Abstract

Indonesia own a lot of rich variety of natural resource, ranking 2nd in globa Variety Index in 2022, But the more varied the natural resources, the more accurate regulation the nation needed to ensure the benefit of ts natural resources to be given to the local organizer and the people, in which is regulated in Statute no 20, Year 2016 about Trademark and Geographical Indication. Geographical Indication itself has its definition as a mark that show the origin of the local product as being influenced and inseparable by geographical factor, giving certain reputation and quality to its local product like White Pepper muntok or Sumbawa Honey in which included in this category as one. However, there’s a misuse of corporation/people that use the benefit of Geographical Indication’s mark without the requirement of it, resulting of the local people in loss and worsen their economical condition. Data shows that there’s 138 product registered as Geographical Indication by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI),yet some of them are not qualifed as one within the statute, in which resulting to unhealty rivalry between different local products as well. Significant measure are needed to ensure justice is upheld to protect local product so the people can be able to enjoy the benefit of natural resource in their area.