Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of English Language Teaching Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ticom: Technology of Information and Communication
Rahmatul Husna
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
THE USE OF ELICITATION TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING SPEAKING TO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Rahmatul Husna; Zul Amri
Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 7, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (846.508 KB) | DOI: 10.24036/jelt.v7i4.101312

Abstract

Many students have difficulties in speaking, especially junior high school students. Some of the problems faced by junior high school students are the students do not want to talk or say anything. They feel shy to speak in front of their friends and afraid of making mistakes. Also, Ur (2012:118) states that the students are often frustrated to speak in a foreign language in the classroom because they scared of criticism or losing face, or shy of the attention. Furthermore, they keep using their own language (mother tongue). These difficulties show the necessary activities or technique must be designed by the teacher in the classroom in order to enable the students to produce a meaningful English oral performance as well as to overcome their problems and weakness. One of the techniques that the teacher can apply is elicitation technique. Elicitation describes procedures that allow the teacher to get the students to provide information rather than give it to them. One way to elicit is by asking questions. Asking questions is the main technique for getting ideas and responses from the students.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI UNTUK PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR:01/PID.SUS-TPK/2018/PN.PDG Rahmatul Husna; Dessy Artina; Davit Rahmadan
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the Criminal Act Article 18 paragraph (1) of Law Number 3 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts. In general, there are still many who question the issue of collecting money, one of which is the criminal prosecution of corruption together. The judge dropped the loan of money to the defendant. The purpose of this thesis discussion, namely: First, understand money arrangements for corruption. Second, to find out the juridical decision on spending money on state spending for case decisions Number: 01 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2018 / PN.Pdg.This type of research is normative legal research. This study is more specific to the principle research on the court's decision by reviewing, analyzing and analyzing various related literature which also discusses interviews with Kasubsi Extraordinary Efforts and Execution of the Special Crimes of the Padang District Attorney.From the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded, First, the criminal arrangement of substitute money is regulated in Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. The compensation payment mechanism is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning Supplementary Criminal Money in Corruption Crime. While the process of billing and convicted person pays for the replacement money, the mechanism for payment of the replacement money is based on the decision of the Attorney General Number: Kep-518 / JA / 11/2001 dated November 1, 2001. the mistake and the role of the defendant so that they have not been able to apply justice, expediency and great proportionality to the community or to the defendant, in accordance with the objectives of the conviction.Author's Suggestions, First, the Judge should consider the facts that have been revealed in court so as to provide justice by providing appropriate and proportionate sanctions to the accused to provide justice for the perpetrators and victims. Second, in imposing a criminal sentence on the defendant, the Judge should pay attention to the benefits of the criminal sanction.Keywords: Judicial Review-Criminal Replacement Money
Klasterisasi Status Gizi Balita Menggunakan Algoritma K-Means Melalui Pendekatan Soft System Methodology Rahmatul Husna; Verry Riyanto
Jurnal Ticom: Technology of Information and Communication Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ticom-September 2024
Publisher : Asosiasi Pendidikan Tinggi Informatika dan Komputer Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70309/ticom.v13i1.120

Abstract

Peranan Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa/Kelurahan diperlukan untuk memantau gizi balita. Dalam hal ini adalah Posyandu Kencana yang beralamat di Jalan Mushola Al-Furqon, RT 005 RW 026, Kota Bekasi. Program gizi balita di Posyandu Kencana telah menjadi bagian penting dari upaya kesehatan masyarakat dan digunakan untuk memantau kesehatan balita. Namun, belum ada metode yang terintegrasi secara efektif untuk mengelompokkan status gizi balita. Maka dari itu, diperlukan klasterisasi serta mengidentifikasi pola status gizi balita dalam kelompok yang dihasilkan. Pengelompokkan ini menggunakan metode clustering algoritma K-Means dengan perhitungan manual dan software RapidMiner yang dikombinasi dengan pendekatan Soft System Methodology (SSM). Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi K-Means dan SSM efektif untuk mengelola data gizi balita dan merancang intervensi yang lebih tepat sasaran. Pengelompokan yang dihasilkan membagi balita menjadi lima kelompok, yaitu cluster 0 (gizi buruk) berjumlah 21 balita atau 17,949%. Cluster 1 (gizi kurang) berjumlah 10 balita atau 8,547%. Kemudian, cluster 2 (gizi baik) berjumlah 24 balita atau 20,513%. Cluster 3 (gizi lebih) berjumlah 28 balita atau 23,932%. Sedangkan, cluster 4 (obesitas) berjumlah 34 balita atau 29,060%. Mengidentifikasi pola ini penting untuk merancang program kesehatan dan fokus pada kelompok yang paling membutuhkan intervensi, seperti balita dengan status gizi buruk dan obesitas
Co-Authors Davit Rahmadan Dessy Artina Verry Riyanto Zul Amri