Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Determining Expiration Period of Lawsuit over Criminal Conduct of Letter Falsification Maulidi Abdillah
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2018
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maulidi Abdillah, Dr. Abdul Madjid, S.H., M.Hum, Fines Fatimah, S.H., M.H.Fakultas Hukum Universitas BrawijayaEmail: maulidi05@gmail.com ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penetapan perhitungan mulai berlakunya daluarsa penuntutan bagi tindak pidana pemalsuan surat. Penelitian disusun berdasarkan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan adanya perbedaan pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Negeri,Pengadilan Tinggi, dan Mahkamah Agung dalam menentukan perhitungan mulai berlakunya daluarsa penuntutan dalam perkara tindak pidana pemalsuan surat atau menggunakan surat palsu. Namun perhitungan mulai berlakunya daluarsa telah diatur secara jelas dalam pasal 79 KUHP dimana perhitungan dimulai sehari setelah tindak pidana dilakukan. Dengan kata lain, perhitungan mulai berlakunya daluarsa dilakukan pada saat “perbuatan” selesai dan memenuhi unsur tindak pidana atau pada saat perbuatan yang telah memenuhi unsur tindak pidana,  tanpa perlu diketahui oleh seseorang (yang dirugikan) tetapi tidak dilakukan pelaporan serta tanpa perlu diketahui terlebih dahulu siapa pelaku tindak pidana yang dimaksud. Perhitungan mulai berlakunya daluarsa bagi tindak pidana memalsukan surat atau menggunakan surat palsu menggunakan dasar ketentuan Pasal 79 ke-1 KUHP dimana penitikberatan perhitungan bukan saat perbuatan selesai dilakukan, melainkan pada saat pemakaian benda yang dipalsu.Kata Kunci : daluarsa penuntutan, pemalsuan surat, pertimbangan hakim ABSTRACT This research is aimed to analyse the determination of expiration of lawsuit regarding criminal conduct of letter falsification. This is categorised into a normative research with statute and case approach. The research result reveals that there is difference found in the consideration made by the Judges of District Court, Higher Court, and Supreme Court interms of determining the time when the expiration starts in the lawsuit over criminal conduct of letter falsification or false letter. However, the time when the expiration should start, as amatter of fact, is clearly regulated according to Article 79 of Criminal Code in which the expiration period starts from the time the crime is committed. In other words, the expiration period starts to be effective after the crime has already been committed and met the criminal elements, or when the conduct has met the criminal elements but without any awareness ofthe victim and victim does not report it to the police, or without any necessity that the culpritneeds to be found out. The period of the expiration in criminal conduct of letter falsificationis determined based on the provision of Article 79 Number 1 of Criminal Code in which it is highlighted the expiration does not take into effect since the criminal conduct, but since the falsified letter is in use.Keywords: expiration of lawsuit, letter falsification, consideration of Judges
Comparison of VO2 Max Prediction Value, Physiological Response, and Borg Scale between 12-Minute and 3200-Meter Run Fitness Tests among Indonesian Army Soldiers Maulidi Abdillah; Tertianto Prabowo; Marietta Shanti Prananta
International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences Vol 4, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (92.194 KB)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the VO2 max and physiological responses between 12-minute and 3200-meter run fitness tests.Methods: The subjects were 40 soldiers aged 18–21 years old of the Infantry Battalion 303/SSM of Cikajang, Garut, West Java, Indonesia. The 12-minute and 3200-meter run fitness tests were conducted with one week resting period. The measurement of the VO2 max prediction was based on each of the formulations and the measurement of physiological response included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, Borg scale and oxygen saturation before and after the tests. This study used a cross-sectional method while the data were analyzed statistically using t-test (p=0.05). Results: The results showed that the VO2 max prediction in 12-minute run fitness test was 52.046±2.980 mL/KgBB/min and the 3200-meter run test was 55.323±3.238 mL/KgBB/min. The value was statistically significant (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in the physiological response in both tests, except the SpO2 parameter after the tests (p=0.021). Conclusions: There is a significant difference in VO2 max prediction between 12 minutes and 3200 meter run test. No significant difference was found in the physiological response in both tests, except the SpO2 parameter. Keywords: 12-minute run fitness test, 3200-meter run fitness test, physiological response, soldiers, VO2 max DOI: 10.15850/ijihs.v4n2.836