Aria Perkasa Utama
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EFEKTIFITAS PASAL 14 POJK NO. 1/POJK.07/2013 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN TERKAIT PENERAPAN MARKET CONDUCT PADA JASA KEUANGAN PERBANKAN (Studi Di PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Kantor Wilayah Malang) Aria Perkasa Utama
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2018
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Aria Perkasa Utama, Dr. Reka Dewantara S.H., M.H, Ranitya Ganindha S.H., M.H Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Email : Ariap92@gmail.com   Abstrak Otoritas Jasa Keuangan merupakan lembaga negara yang mempunyai fungsi regulasi (pengaturan) dan supervisi (pengawasan) terhadap seluruh kegiatan di dalam sektor jasa keuangan. Sektor jasa keuangan tersebut meliputi, jasa keuangan di sektor perbankan, kegiatan jasa keuangan di sektor pasar modal dan kegiatan jasa keuangan di sektor perasuransian, dana pensiun, lembaga pembiayaan dan lembaga jasa keuangan lainnya. Berdasarkan Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang OJK disebutkan bahwa salah satu tugas OJK adalah memberikan perlindungan kepada Konsumen dan/ atau masyarakat. Dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan Konsumen, OJK telah menerbitkan Peraturan OJK (POJK) No. 01/POJK.07/2013 tanggal 26 Juli 2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan. POJK dimaksud menerapkan prinsip keseimbangan, yaitu antara menumbuh kembangkan sektor jasa keuangan secara berkesinambungan dan secara bersamaan memberikan perlindungan kepada Konsumen dan/atau masyarakat sebagai pengguna jasa keuangan. POJK tersebut mengandung 3 aspek utama yaitu: (i) peningkatan transparansi dan pengungkapan manfaat, risiko serta biaya atas produk dan/atau layanan Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan (PUJK); (ii) tanggung jawab PUJK untuk melakukan penilaian kesesuaian produk dan/atau layanan dengan risiko yang dihadapi oleh konsumen keuangan; (iii) prosedur yang lebih sederhana dan kemudahan konsumen keuangan untuk menyampaikan pengaduan dan penyelesaian sengketa atas produk dan/ atau layanan PUJK. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis memilih metode penelitian empiris dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis yang dilakukan di masyarakat dengan maksud dan tujuan untuk menemukan fakta, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan masalah, identifikasi masalah dan yang terakhir adalah penyelesaian masalah Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Konsumen, Jasa Keuangan, Perbankan, Market Condutct Abstract The Financial Services Authority is a state institution that has regulatory functions and supervision in all activities in the financial services sector. The financial services sector includes financial services in the banking sector, financial services activities in the capital market sector and financial services activities in the insurance sector, pension funds, financial institutions and other financial services institutions. Based on Article 4 of Law No. 21 of 2011 on Financial Services Authority (hereinafter called “OJK”), it is stated that one of the tasks of the OJK is to provide protection to consumers and/or the community. In order to provide consumer protection, OJK has issued OJK Regulation (POJK) No. 01/POJK.07/2013 dated 26th July 2013 on Consumer Protection in Financial Services Sector. POJK is intended to implement the principle of balance, which is between developing the financial services sector on an ongoing basis and simultaneously providing protection to consumers and/or the public as users of financial services. The POJK contains 3 main aspects, namely: (i) increasing transparency and disclosure of benefits, risks and costs of products and/or services of Financial Service Providers; (ii) the responsibility of the PUJK to assess the suitability of products and/or services with the risks faced by financial consumers; (iii) simpler procedures and ease of financial consumers to submit complaints and resolve disputes over PUJK products and / or services. In this study, the author chose empirical research method using a sociological juridical approach that was carried out in the community that intent and aim to finding facts, then proceed with problems, problem identification and the last was problem-solving.Keywords: Consumer Protection, Financial Services, Banking, Market Condutct 
Legal and Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Supreme Court Cassation Decision Aria Perkasa Utama; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Fachrizal Afandi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.345

Abstract

The development of financial technology through blockchain-based crypto assets has given rise to new patterns of economic crime, particularly money laundering offenses. The decentralized, anonymous, and cross-jurisdictional characteristics of crypto assets make them an effective means of concealing the illicit origin of criminal proceeds. Within the national legal framework, the regulation of money laundering under Law Number 8 of 2010 has not explicitly accommodated crypto asset transactions, resulting in normative gaps and legal uncertainty. These issues are reflected in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Cassation Decision Number 2029 K/Pid.Sus/2023 concerning Indra Kesuma, also known as Indra Kenz. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning underlying judicial decisions in money laundering cases involving crypto asset-based schemes and to formulate regulatory reform of money laundering laws based on a cyber criminology approach. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that judges adopted a progressive interpretation of Article 1 paragraph (1), Article 3, and Article 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law by qualifying crypto assets as proceeds of crime. The cyber criminology approach underscores the necessity of digital evidentiary systems and a comprehensive understanding of blockchain technology. Furthermore, existing regulations remain inadequate, necessitating normative reform that includes the definition of crypto assets, obligations for reporting suspicious transactions, and the integration of on-chain Know Your Customer (KYC) mechanisms to ensure legal certainty and effective law enforcement.