<![CDATA[Tassha Nica R. Sihotang, Alfons Zakaria, Mufatikhatul Farikhah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Jl. MT. Haryono No. 169 Malang Email: tassha.riana@gmail.com Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas implikasi yuridis putusan hakim yang memutus pidana di atas ancaman maksimum pidana yang ditentukan dalam undang-undang (Studi Putusan No.219/pid.b/2018/pn.bg) hakim menyatakan perbuatan terdakwa memenuhi unsur pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP tentang penganiayaan yang menyebabkan kematian dimana ancaman pidana maksimumnya adalah 7 tahun penjara. Namun hakim dalam putusannya menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama 8 tahun. Berdasarkan hal tersebut dapat diketahui bahwa telah terjadi konflik hukum antara ketentuan dalam undang-undang dan kenyataan dalam putusan pengadilan. Kemudian rumusan masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah apa dаsаr pertimbаngаn hаkim pаdа Putusаn No. 219/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Bgl dаlаm menjаtuhkаn pidаnа di аtаs аncаmаn mаksimum pidаnа yаng ditentukаn dаlаm undаng-undаng serta bаgаimаnа implikаsi yuridis putusаn hаkim yаng memutus pidаnа di аtаs аncаmаn mаksimum pidаnа yаng ditentukаn undаng-undаng. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dan akan dianalisis menggunakan interpretasi gramatikal dan sistematis. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan bahwa dasar pertimbangan hakim pаdа Putusаn No. 219/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Bgl dаlаm menjаtuhkаn pidаnа di аtаs аncаmаn mаksimum pidаnа yаng ditentukаn dаlаm undаng-undаng meliputi dasar menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan yaitu terpenuhinya unsur pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP dan alasan menjatuhkan pidana di atas maksimum pasal yang didakwakan karena 1).Terdakwa menjadi buron/melarikan diri selama 4 tahun, 2). Terdakwa melakukan perbuatannya dengan sadis, 3). Pidana 7 tahun kurang/ tidak setimpal dengan kesalahan, 4). Korban yang meninggal merupakan tulang punggung keluarga. Kemudian untuk implikаsi yuridis putusаn hаkim yаng memutus pidаnа di аtаs аncаmаn mаksimum pidаnа yаng ditentukаn undаng-undаng meliputi putusan tetap sah secara hukum, putusan bertentangan dengan pasal yang didakwakan, bertentangan dengan asas legalitas, dan putusan dapat dibatalkan dengan upaya hukum luar biasa.  Kata Kunci : Implikasi Yuridis, Putusan Hakim, Pidana di atas Maksimum Abstrac  This research studies judicial implication of the judge’s decision over passing the criminal judgement exceeding the maximum provision as stated in the law (A study of Decision Number 219/pid.b/2018/pn.bg), where the judge states that the criminal act committed by the defendant meets the element of Article 351 paragraph (3) of Criminal code concerning an assault causing death stating that the maximum sentencing is up to seven years’ imprisonment. This is contrary to the decision of the judge sentencing the defendant to eight years’ imprisonment. From this case, there is legal conflict between the provision in the Law and the reality. The issue studied in this research involves the basic consideration of the judge in Decision Number 219/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Bgl over the punishment exceeding the provision in the law and the juridical implication of the Decision passing the judgement exceeding the maximum provision of the Law. This normative-legal research used statute and case approach, supported by primary and secondary materials that were further analysed based on grammatical and systematic analysis. The result reveals that the basic consideration of the judge regarding the judgement exceeding the provision written in the law is affected by the observation in which crime is seen to meet the element of Article 351 paragraph (3) of Criminal Code. Moreover, this exceeding imprisonment period is due to the following considerations: 1) the defendant has been fugitive or at large for four years, 2) the defendant has committed the crime sadistically, 3) seven years’ imprisonment is seen unfair for such inhuman conduct, 4) the dead victim serves as the backbone of the family. In terms of juridical implication, it is still seen legal and valid for the judge to pass the judgement exceeding the maximum jail period provision as in Law, it is against the principle of legality, and the decision can be revoked through extraordinary legal effort. Keywords: juridical implication, judge’s decision, sentence exceeding maximum provision]]>
