Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Safira Annisa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGАN HUKUM BАGI KONSUMEN DАLАM JUАL BELI RUMАH TERHADAP WANPRESTASI PENGEMBАNG (STUDI KАSUS PELАNGI GRАND RESIDENCE DАN PELАNGI METRO RESIDENCE DI BALIKPAPAN) Safira Annisa
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2020
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sаfirа Аnnisа, Dr. Budi Sаntoso, Fаkultаs Hukum Universitаs Brаwijаyа Jl. MT. Hаryono 169 Mаlаng 65145, Telp (0341) 553898 Fаx (0341) 566505 Emаil: sаvirааnnisа21@gmаil.com   Аbstrаk Pengembаng perumаhаn Pelаngi Grаnd Residence dаn Pelаngi Metro Residence PT. Pelаngi Puterа Mаndiri telаh melаkukаn wаnprestаsi yаitu dengаn menjаminkаn sertifikаt induk perumаhаn Pelаngi Grаnd Residence ke Bаnk X dаn Pelаngi Metro Residence ke Bаnk Y tаnpа sepengetаhuаn konsumen. Pihаk pengembаng bekerjа sаmа dengаn Bаnk Z dаn Bаnk W untuk memberikаn fаsilitаs Kredit Pemilikаn Rumаh (KPR) kepаdа konsumen, nаmun kenyаtааnnyа sertifikаt rumаh tidаk berаdа di Bаnk tersebut sehinggа konsumen memutuskаn untuk tidаk melаnjutkаn kewаjibаn merekа untuk membаyаr KPR. Wаnprestаsi tersebut menyebаbkаn kerugiаn bаgi konsumen yаitu konsumen tidаk menerimа sertifikаt sebаgаi bentuk legаlitаs rumаh merekа. Penulisаn ini menggunаkаn metode hukum empiris, melаlui pendekаtаn yuridis sosiologis yаng dilаkukаn dengаn penelitiаn lаngsung ke obyek bersаngkutаn. Berdаsаrkаn hаsil penelitiаn diketаhui bаhwа pihаk pengembаng telаh melаkukаn wаnprestаsi dаn konsumen mendаpаtkаn perlindungаn hukum sesuаi pаdа Pаsаl 45 Undаng-Undаng Nomor 8 Tаhun 1999 tentаng Perlindungаn Konsumen dаn pengembаng PT. Pelаngi Puterа Mаndiri dibebаni tаnggung jаwаb terhаdаp suаtu perbuаtаn wаnprestаsi sesuаi pаdа Pаsаl 1243 KUHPerdаtа dаn Pаsаl 19 аyаt 1 Undаng-Undаng Nomor 8 Tаhun 1999 tentаng Perlindungаn Konsumen. Dаlаm pelаksаnааnnyа, pengembаng tidаk menjаlаnkаn tаnggung jаwаbnyа mаkа konsumen berhаk untuk menggugаt pengembаng PT. Pelаngi Puterа Mаndiri ke pengаdilаn berdаsаrkаn Pаsаl 45 Undаng-Undаng Nomor 8 Tаhun 1999 tentаng Perlindungаn Konsumen. Kаtа kunci: Perlindungаn hukum, konsumen perumаhаn, wаnprestаsi pengembаng.   Аbstrаct The developer of Pelangi Grand Residence and Pelangi Metro Residence of Pelangi Putera Mandiri has committed breach of contract where house certificates of Pelangi Grand Residence are put as collateral in Bank X and Pelangi Metro Residence in Bank Y without consent of consumers. The developer cooperates with Bank Z and Bank W to provide facilities for purchase of houses on instalment to consumers. However, it was found that the house certificates are not in both banks and it has sparked outcry where the buyers decided to not continue to pay their instalment. This breach of contract has disadvantaged the buyers since they do not hold their certificates as legal proof of ownership. This research was conducted based on empirical legal method and socio-juridical approach by conducting direct observation. The research result has learned that the developer allegedly committed breach of contract and the buyers are provided with legal protection according to Article 45 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The developer of PT. Pelangi Putera Mandiri is burdened with liability over the breach of contract committed according to Article 1243 of Civil Code and Article 19 paragraph 1 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Since the developer fails to perform his responsibility appropriately, the consumers have their right to sue the developer and to bring the case to court according to Article 45 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Keywords: legal protection, house buyers, breach of contract committed by developer
REGULATIONS ON THE VALIDATION OF MARRIAGE AGREEMENTS CARRIED OUT BY NOTARIES IN INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Safira Annisa; Djumikasi; Yenny Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2479

Abstract

The changes that occurred in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 caused multiple interpretations, the change of the phrase "Making a written agreement" in Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law to "submitting a written agreement" in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 needs to be explained in more detail so that it creates legal certainty. The difference between the phrases "Making" and "Submitting" in the KBBI has a very different meaning, not explaining the meaning of this phrase will cause legal uncertainty, especially for Notaries. So it is necessary to study how the regulation of the ratification of marriage agreements carried out by notaries in Indonesian positive law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The type of research used is the normative legal method, namely research conducted on legal sources such as laws or other literature that includes analysis of legal principles to identify and resolve legal issues that will be studied using the Theory of Legal Certainty. The results of the analysis explain that from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Notaries should have two new authorities.
Co-Authors Djumikasi Yenny Eta Widyanti