A. Dzarrin al-Hamidi
Fakultas Syariah IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Nikah Mut’ah dalam Sorotan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif A. Dzarrin al-Hamidi
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 11 No 1 Juni (2008): Al-Qanun Vol. 11, No. 1, Juni 2008
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.01 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2008.11.1 Juni.219-231

Abstract

In Islam, marriage lasts until death does the couple apart. Nonetheless, if one or both parties cannot fulfill the rights and perform the duties of marriage, a marriage can end up in divorce. Likewise, if a marriage ends with the death of one of the two parties, the surviving spouse is allowed to remarry. The above description about the essence of marriage cannot be found in temporary marriages. In temporary marriages, a marriage is set to last for a certain time without obligation of providing support and all kinds necessary for normal marriages such as housing, medicines, clothes, and so on. Pregnancy is also part of the contract. Likewise, no inheritance is resulted from such marriages. There is also no divorce as well as right for just treatment in case of the husband is polygamous. The only right for wife is dowry. Thus, there is no responsibility in contemporary marriages. Those marriages are only a means for fulfillment of biological needs whenever a man and a woman have to be in a place away from family for certain period of time.
Telaah Kritis terhadap al-Risalah:‎ Karya Magnum Opus ‎ Usul Fikih Imam al-Shafi’iy A. Dzarrin al-Hamidi
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 19 No 1 (2016): Al-Qanun Vol. 19, No. 1, Juni 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (523.767 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2016.19.1.113-146

Abstract

Abstract: This paper specifically investigates conceptual contribution of al-Shafi'iy -as contained in his al-Risalah- to the model or system of formation of Islamic law relating to grounding normative basis in his concep of Islamic law, that there are five: al-Qur'an, Sunnah, ijma', qiyas, and aqawil al-sahabah. In the method of the law-making, Kitab al-Risalah was referring to the structure of the legal hierarchy. In a hierarchical structure of this law starts from the highest and most early as the first reference, then decreased to below. Recognized or not, through this work began systematically structured models of istinbat in Islamic law. Also through this work also, al-Sha fi'iy recognized had been instrumental in laying the foundations of istinbat in Islamic law which further systematically arranged a new nomenclature called the science of usul fiqh. In the contemporary era, Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd tried to do a critical reading by stating that the thought of al-Shafi'iy is flavorful the Arab centric, which leads to sectarianism. However, according to the author, these accusations are not sufficient in alibi to shift the great merit of al-Shafi'iy in pioneering the idea to systematize the disciplines of usul fiqh. Abstrak: Tulisan ini secara khusus menyorot sumbangan pemikiran al-Shafi’iy—seperti yang tertuang dalam karyanya al-Risalah—terhadap model atau sistem pembentukan hukum Islam yang terkait dengan landasan normatif yang dijadikan pegangan dalam memunculkan pemikiran fikihnya, yaitu ada lima: al-Qur’an, Sunnah,  Ijma’, Qiyas, dan Aqawil al-Sahabah. Adapun dalam metode menetapkan hukum, kitab al-Risalah mengacu pada struktur hierarki hukum. Dalam struktur hierarki hukum ini dimulai dari yang paling tinggi dan yang paling awal sebagai acuan pertama, selanjutnya mengacu dengan menurun ke bawahnya. Diakui atau tidak, melalui karyanya ini mulai tersusun rapi model-model istinbat hukum Islam. Juga melalui karyanya ini pula, al-Shafi’iy ditahbiskan telah berjasa dalam meletakkan dasar-dasar istinbat hukum Islam yang selanjutnya tersusunlah secara sistematis sebuah nomenklatur baru yang bernama ilmu usul fikih. Pada era kekinian, Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd mencoba melakukan pembacaan kritis dengan menyatakan pemikiran al-Shafi’iy beraroma Arab sentris yang mengarah pada label sektarianisme. Namun demikian tuduhan ini, menurut hemat penulis, tidak cukup alibi untuk menggeser jasa besar al-Shafi’iy dalam merintis gagasan mensistematisasi disiplin ilmu usul fikih.