Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Forum Ilmu Sosial Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian
- Hariyanto
Unknown Affiliation
Earth & Planetary Sciences Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Forum Ilmu Sosial

 1 
KESIAPAN PENDUDUK PEMUKIM DI DAERAH RAWAN LONGSOR KOTA SEMARANG Suharini, Erni; Hariyanto, -
Forum Ilmu Sosial Vol 35, No 2 (2008): December 2008
Publisher : Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/fis.v35i2.1295

Abstract

Every man needs a place to live in a safe and comfortable for the continuance of his life. Due tovarious factors, the human desire to live in areas prone to disasters such as landslides. Some of them donot know the danger they mengacam, there are some others who already know the risks that might occur,and then they make the steps antisipasinya. Those who live in landslide-prone areas have a differentmotivation. Motivation and the anticipation is what menajdi purpose of this research. Population researchis their (families) who live in areas prone to landslides in the city of Semarang. Identification of areasprone to landslides views of the topography / slope gradient and rock formation (formation Kalibiuk),which includes District Tembalang, Gunungpati, and Ngalian. Sample taken from the third kecamtan(purposively sampling) of 50 families. Data analyzed in quantitative descriptive. Results of research thatthey live in areas prone to landslides divided in two klas namely immigrants and native inhabitants. Themigrants generally live in housing built by developers who missal, their economic level is higher, nonagriculturallivelihoods. Instead of the native build their own home, a lower level of economic migrantson, livelihood of farmers or other informal sectors. Motivation migrants choose to stay here because ofthe consideration is close to the work, accessibility, high price. For the native land because of inheritanceand a source of livelihood here (rice field, moor). Both newcomers and the natives already know the riskof landslides. They differ only in mengapresiasi against landslides. Immigrants with anticipating technicalengineering building, such as strengthening the bones, make a levee, to reforestation. Erosion of the nativelook as natural occurrence, so no need to anticipate the technical engineering, they just do reforestation.One thing that has not been done by both migrants and their native population is on the socialization oftheir children Naka-how to save themselves in case landslides really happened.Keywords: Readiness of the population, the area prone to landslides, erosion
PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DI KOTA SEMARANG UNTUK MENUJU KOTA BERSIH Hariyanto, -; Ariyani, -
Forum Ilmu Sosial Vol 38, No 1 (2011): June 2011
Publisher : Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/fis.v38i1.1741

Abstract

Waste is derived from human activites. The amount or volume of waste is equivalent with level of material consumption used everday. The growth of population and socety economic growth will increase waste production. Population growth of Semarang City in 2003-2008 is 1,48% with the amount of populatioan is 1,48 million  (2008). The certainly will create big amount of waste. The aim of this research is 1) to know how big is the amount of waste volume produced dy Semarang citizen, 2) to know how is the waste management in Semarang City to achieve “Adipura City”. Research methodology which is used is quantitative descriptive. Research population is the citizen of Semarang City, the sample is 70 family head taken using purposive random sampling. The result of the research shows that the volume waste produced is 1.000-1.500 ton per day, with waste development 8-12% per year. Waste volume is infuenced by the number of person in each family, economic level and kind of activities. From that volume, 61,2% is industri waste and in the rest is non-industri. In the case of waste management, only 31% of waste is taken to fnal disposal, 53% of waste is burnt or burried, 15% is thrown to river/ditch, and 1,5% of waste is made compost. The society regards maste problem as government bussines, not personal individual bussines. Waste management approach emphasizes more on post-production waste management, instead of directing to the effort to decrease waste volume before production. Keywords: Waste, waste management
Co-Authors - Ariyani Erni Suharini Erni Suharini