Hafidz Hasyim
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Watak Peradaban dalam Epistimologi Ibnu Khaldun Hafidz Hasyim
Humaniora Vol 22, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3187.953 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jh.1342

Abstract

This article investigates Ibn Khaldun's thought on the nature of civilization from a historical perspective and his thought on the nature of civilization as an epistemological foundation. It was found that the nature of civilization is epistemological because the study of the nature of civilization is a new method in discovering the substance of history. Furthermore, the nature civilization is related to the nature of human beings for having produced sciences in its history. According to Ibn Khaldun, our system of thought is limited in two ways: the relation of physical systems to both perception and intellectual, and the relation of physical systems to spirituality. In this context, Ibn Khaldun classifies sciences into intellectual and revelational sciences.
Kesadaran Intensionalitas dalam Fenomenologi Edmund Husserl: Suatu Studi Epistemologi dalam Upaya Perbandingan dengan Metode Ilmiah: Intentionality Awareness in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology: An Epistemological Study in Comparative Perspective with the Scientific Method Hasyim, Hafidz
Fenomena Vol 8 No 1 (2009): FENOMENA: Journal of the Social Sciences
Publisher : LP2M UIN KH.Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/fenomena.v8i1.438

Abstract

-
Muslim Moderat, Wacana Politik, dan Pertarungan Relasi Kuasa: Moderate Muslims, Political Discourse, and the Struggle for Power Relations Hasyim, Hafidz
Fenomena Vol 9 No 1 (2010): FENOMENA: Journal of the Social Sciences
Publisher : LP2M UIN KH.Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/fenomena.v9i1.466

Abstract

This research focuses on: (1) the ideas produced by moderate Muslims in Jember in relation to the ongoing “democratic celebration”; (2) the ideological tendencies in the discourse of moderate Muslims; and (3) the “local tricks” employed to transform political discourse to build civil society. This field research analyzes data obtained from field findings, supported by references such as books, journals, and other supporting materials. The study is qualitative in nature. Its aim is to uncover the meaning constructed by moderate Muslims through interpretation, hermeneutics, and discourse analysis based on observation, interviews, documentation, and textual study. Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada: (1) gagasan‑gagasan yang dihasilkan oleh Muslim moderat di Jember sehubungan dengan “perayaan demokrasi” yang sedang berlangsung; (2) kecenderungan ideologis dalam wacana Muslim moderat; dan (3) “trik lokal” yang digunakan untuk mentransformasi wacana politik demi membangun masyarakat sipil. Penelitian lapangan ini mengolah data hasil temuan lapangan yang didukung oleh referensi berupa buku, jurnal, dan data pendukung lainnya. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif. Tujuannya adalah menemukan makna yang dibangun oleh Muslim moderat melalui interpretasi, hermeneutika, dan analisis wacana berdasarkan observasi, wawancara, dokumentasi, serta studi teks.
Pluralisme Agama, Ulama Sufi, dan Pertarungan Wacana: Religious Pluralism, Sufi Scholars, and the Discourse Struggle Hasyim, Hafidz
Fenomena Vol 11 No 2 (2012): FENOMENA: Journal of the Social Sciences
Publisher : LP2M UIN KH.Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/fenomena.v11i2.519

Abstract

The Sufi perspective provides a clear lens to examine the discourse of religious pluralism. Sufi religious views encompass two aspects: the exoteric and the esoteric. The exoteric aspect of religion is the outward dimension, emphasizing sharia, forms, and religious symbols. Meanwhile, the esoteric aspect is the innermost dimension of every religion, focusing on inner, spiritual experiences to attain the ultimate reality, God. Sufi scholars in Jember emphasize inner experiences, as the purpose of religion is to reach God through such experiences, without neglecting sharia, which serves as the path to this goal. However, these Sufi scholars avoid debating sharia, as it pertains to methodology. Their rationale is that, fundamentally, all religions—regardless of form or type—aim to face the Divine. The error and deviation, according to Sufi scholars, lie in directing religion toward anything other than Allah. Perspektif Sufi mampu melihat secara jelas wacana pluralisme agama. Perspektif agama Sufi memandang dua aspek, yaitu aspek eksoterik dan esoterik. Aspek eksoterik agama adalah aspek lahiriah yang menekankan pada syariah, bentuk, dan simbol-simbol agama. Sementara aspek esoterik adalah aspek terdalam dalam setiap agama, yang menekankan pengalaman batin dan spiritual dalam mencapai realitas sejati, yaitu Tuhan. Ulama Sufi di Jember memberikan perhatian pada pengalaman batin, karena tujuan agama adalah mencapai Tuhan melalui pengalaman batin, namun tidak mengesampingkan syariah, sebab syariah adalah jalan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Namun, ulama Sufi Jember tidak memperdebatkan wilayah syariah karena hal itu berkaitan dengan metode. Alasan pandangan ulama Sufi ini adalah bahwa pada dasarnya semua agama, terlepas dari bentuk dan jenisnya, bertujuan untuk menghadap Yang Ilahi. Kesalahan dan penyimpangan menurut ulama Sufi adalah ketika agama tidak ditujukan untuk selain Allah.
Klaim Kebenaran Agama: Studi Kasus atas Pembakaran Tempat Ibadah LDII di Desa Tanggul Wetan, Kecamatan Tanggul, Kabupaten Jember: Religious Truth Claims: A Case Study of the Burning of LDII Worship Place in Tanggul Wetan Village, Tanggul Subdistrict, Jember Regency Hasyim, Hafidz
Fenomena Vol 12 No 1 (2013): FENOMENA: Journal of the Social Sciences
Publisher : LP2M UIN KH.Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/fenomena.v12i1.530

Abstract

Today, the escalation of conflicts in the name of religion is growing, even though Indonesia is referenced by the international community as a multicultural and plural nation that has long been able to build a harmonious society with a relatively high level of tolerance. To achieve the realization of a harmonious society, many forums and dialogues have been conducted to minimize religious conflicts. The fundamental question remains: despite the dialogues and numerous forums, why can the issue of inter-religious conflicts not be stopped? This issue requires special thought, such as the approach to dialogue, whether the current model or method is no longer adequate, whether the discussed material is not quite right, and what paradigm can be used to build an adequate dialogue to resolve conflicts. A temporary assumption suggests that the cause of the conflict is the emergence of religious truth claims made by some Muslims, supported by certain religious institutions based on interpretations of normative texts, namely the Quran and Hadith. Saat ini, eskalasi konflik atas nama agama semakin meningkat, padahal Indonesia dikenal oleh masyarakat internasional sebagai negara yang multikultural dan plural, serta telah lama mampu membangun masyarakat yang harmonis dengan tingkat toleransi yang cukup tinggi. Untuk mewujudkan masyarakat yang harmonis, banyak forum dan dialog telah dilakukan untuk meminimalisir konflik agama. Namun, pertanyaan mendasar adalah mengapa meskipun dialog telah dilakukan dan banyak forum telah dibentuk, isu konflik antar agama masih belum bisa dihentikan. Persoalan ini memerlukan pemikiran khusus, seperti pendekatan dialog yang digunakan, apakah model atau metode dialog yang ada sudah tidak memadai, ataukah materi yang dibahas kurang tepat, serta paradigma apa yang dapat digunakan untuk membangun dialog yang memadai guna menyelesaikan konflik. Asumsi sementara menunjukkan bahwa penyebab konflik adalah munculnya klaim kebenaran agama (truth claims) yang dilakukan oleh sebagian umat Islam, didukung oleh lembaga keagamaan tertentu berdasarkan penafsiran terhadap teks normatif, yaitu Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits.