Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Corporate Character Scale Hanwha Life Insurance Surabaya di Mata Karyawannya Kezia Sola Gratia
Jurnal e-Komunikasi Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Vol 5, no 1 February 2017
Publisher : Jurnal e-Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (363.741 KB)

Abstract

Menjaga citra adalah suatu hal yang wajib untuk dilakukan oleh sebuah perusahaan. Corporate Character Scale atau CCS adalah suatu alat ukut untuk mengukur citra perusahaan baik secara internal maupun eksternal.  Tidak hanya citra eksternal saja yang perlu untuk dijaga, citra internal pun sangat penting untuk dijaga oleh perusahaan. Adanya fenomena tentang karyawan Indonesia yang bekerja di perusahaan Korea Selatan yang mengatakan bahwa perusahaan Korea Selatan adalah perusahaan asing terburuk di Indonesia dari penelitian sekitar 20 tahun lalu itu menarik perhatian peneliti untuk meneliti perusahaan asal Korea Selatan. Hanwha Life Insurance adalah perusahaan asal Korea Selatan yang menjadi subjek penelitian ini. Pendekatan yang dilakukan adalah dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode sampling. Berdasarkan metode ini, peneliti menemukan hasil tentang CCS menurut karyawan, komunikasi organisasi dan hubungan internal pada Hanwha Life Insurance Surabaya.Hasil penelitian ini adalah CCS menurut karyawan Hanwha Life Insurance adalah sangat positif secara umumnya. Namun beberapa kecenderungan juga ditemukan yaitu salah satunya adalah semakin lama karyawan bergabung, semakin rendah nilai CCS nya. 
Emerging the Submerged Realities of Mass Rape in the News of May 1998 Riot Kezia Sola Gratia
Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi (Sinta 2)
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah UNISBA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/mediator.v17i2.3497

Abstract

This study employs agenda-setting and media fragmenting theory alongside critical analysis of discourse studies (CADS) to scrutinize media dynamics during the May 1998 Riots in Indonesia. Agenda-setting and Media Framing theories analyze how the media prioritizes and frames specific issues. At the same time, CADS provides a method to present a detailed examination of language and representation in media texts. By analyzing 296 and 261 news articles from two of the most prominent Indonesian online newspaper platforms, the study investigates the submersion of discourses on gender and ethnic violence. Utilizing CADS, the research conducts frequency, collocation, concordance, cluster, and keyword analyses to uncover hidden narratives of gender and ethnic violence within the riot coverage. The analysis reveals significant gaps in discourse on racial and gender-based violence, highlighting the importance of identifying underlying narratives in news coverage. Additionally, the study underscores a void in the coverage of gender and ethnic violence discourses related to the May 1998 Riots, suggesting potential oversight or suppression of crucial aspects. This highlights the media's dual role as a reflector of events and an active influencer of public narratives.
Retorika Krisis: Analisis Pidato Presiden Indonesia dan Korea Selatan pada Tragedi Kanjuruhan dan Itaewon Kezia Sola Gratia
Da'watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): Da'watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting (In Press)
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/dawatuna.v4i4.3069

Abstract

This study compares the responses of the Indonesian and South Korean presidents to man-made disasters and investigates the presence of shift-blaming in their speeches. Utilizing Rhetorical Analysis (RA) to examine how speeches are constructed to achieve specific objectives, and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to explore historical and social contexts, the study focuses on President Jokowi’s speeches following the Kanjuruhan tragedy and President Yoon’s speeches after the Itaewon disaster. RA delves into the rhetorical strategies, including invention, disposition, style, and delivery, to analyze how each president uses ethos, logos, and pathos to construct their messages. CDA further examines the discourse of shift-blaming characteristic of autocratic tendencies. The findings reveal differences in how each president addresses responsibility and accountability. While the trace of shift blaming is prominently evident in Jokowi’s speeches, Yoon’s speeches are characterized by a strong emphasis on image-saving. This comparative analysis provides insights into the distinct communication strategies employed by leaders in response to man-made disasters.