Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Episteme: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman
M Maftukhin
IAIN Tulungagung
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TEOLOGI LINGKUNGAN PERSPEKTIF SEYYED HOSSEIN NASR M Maftukhin
Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 16 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/dinamika.2016.16.2.337-352

Abstract

Environmental theology is the science that discusses relationship between religion and nature is primarily concerned with environmental issues. Theology environment is a way to bring God into the ecological aspect. This conception appears as a response to the issue of environmental crises that occurred since the Middle Ages. In the theology perspective, environmental crisis that is currently going on can’t be separated from human behavior is conscious or not have damaged the eco system of the earth so that a balance is threatened.This article seeks it by borrowing a concept of Seyyed Hossein Nasr poured in some of his magnum opus. Search of authors for works Nasr, in general the environmental crisis caused by modern human error of viewing the world. Modern humans are greedy and view the world solely as an object of scientific development also caused the loss of esoteric dimension. Nasr then give a solution that is appropriate nature is seen as a theophany; God’s power mirrors and a haven for humans.Kata Kunci: Teologi Lingkungan, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Modern
REPOSISI KONSEP KETUHANAN: TANGGAPAN MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAN SAID NURSI ATAS PERJUMPAAN ISLAM DAN SAINS M Maftukhin
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.77-102

Abstract

Artikel ini menghadirkan dua cara pandang berbeda antara Muhammad Iqbal dan Said Nursi dalam upaya reposisi konsep ketuhanan saat Islam bertemu sains. Artikel ini memperlihatkan bagaimana Iqbal menerima sains dengan melakukan penyesuaian ajaran Islam agar sejalan dengan epistemologi sains dan rasionalisme dengan tetap merujuk pada al-Qur’an. Konsep ketuhanan teis yang dirasa tidak sesuai dengan rasionalisme dan perkembangan sains, mendapat sentuhan Iqbal dengan dikonstruksi menjadi konsep panentheisme. Sementara itu, Said Nursi, meskipun ia juga mendorong adopsi sains, namun Nursi hampir tidak melakukan penyesuaian apa pun dalam konsep ketuhanan Islam. Sebagai pewaris pemikiran al-Asy’ariyyah, justru Nursi memilah sains dalam dua kategori, yaitu sains yang memuat nilai positif dan sains yang memuat aspek negatif. Selanjutnya Nursi hanya mengambil aspek positif dan meninggalkan aspek negatifnya. Dengan menggunakan teori Ian Barbour, artikel ini memasukkan pendekatan Iqbal dalam kategori integrasi epistemologis, sedangkan pendekatan Said Nursi masuk dalam kategori integrasi ontologis.This article seeks to presents a distinct view of two Muslim thinkers on repositioning concept of God in the face of adoption to science. That is of Muhammad Iqbal’s and of Said Nursi’s. It shows that Iqbal used methods of reconstruction on Islamic theology in order for which go in line with scientific epistemology despite it remains strongly based on the Qur’an. Iqbal is of the view that theistic God of Islam appears to come in contrast to the rationalism and modern scientific approaches. For that reason, Iqbal changed this theistic God to be a panentheistic God of modern sciences. On the other side, Said Nursi urges Muslim community to adopt science as well, but—in contrast to Iqbal—he did almost nothing in reconstructing Islamic theology. As in heritor of the doctrines of Ash’arite, instead he classified modern science into two camps, that of the positive in term of Islamic interests and that of the negative. He adopts the positive one while keeping at bay the rest. Departing from Ian Barbour’s theory, this article categorizes Iqbal’s and Nursi’s adoption to science as integration. This article proposes that the method of Iqbal’s integration during his reconstruction on Islamic theology is an epistemological integration, meanwhile Nursi’s approach is ontological integration.
REPOSISI KONSEP KETUHANAN: TANGGAPAN MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAN SAID NURSI ATAS PERJUMPAAN ISLAM DAN SAINS M Maftukhin
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.77-102

Abstract

Artikel ini menghadirkan dua cara pandang berbeda antara Muhammad Iqbal dan Said Nursi dalam upaya reposisi konsep ketuhanan saat Islam bertemu sains. Artikel ini memperlihatkan bagaimana Iqbal menerima sains dengan melakukan penyesuaian ajaran Islam agar sejalan dengan epistemologi sains dan rasionalisme dengan tetap merujuk pada al-Qur’an. Konsep ketuhanan teis yang dirasa tidak sesuai dengan rasionalisme dan perkembangan sains, mendapat sentuhan Iqbal dengan dikonstruksi menjadi konsep panentheisme. Sementara itu, Said Nursi, meskipun ia juga mendorong adopsi sains, namun Nursi hampir tidak melakukan penyesuaian apa pun dalam konsep ketuhanan Islam. Sebagai pewaris pemikiran al-Asy’ariyyah, justru Nursi memilah sains dalam dua kategori, yaitu sains yang memuat nilai positif dan sains yang memuat aspek negatif. Selanjutnya Nursi hanya mengambil aspek positif dan meninggalkan aspek negatifnya. Dengan menggunakan teori Ian Barbour, artikel ini memasukkan pendekatan Iqbal dalam kategori integrasi epistemologis, sedangkan pendekatan Said Nursi masuk dalam kategori integrasi ontologis.This article seeks to presents a distinct view of two Muslim thinkers on repositioning concept of God in the face of adoption to science. That is of Muhammad Iqbal’s and of Said Nursi’s. It shows that Iqbal used methods of reconstruction on Islamic theology in order for which go in line with scientific epistemology despite it remains strongly based on the Qur’an. Iqbal is of the view that theistic God of Islam appears to come in contrast to the rationalism and modern scientific approaches. For that reason, Iqbal changed this theistic God to be a panentheistic God of modern sciences. On the other side, Said Nursi urges Muslim community to adopt science as well, but—in contrast to Iqbal—he did almost nothing in reconstructing Islamic theology. As in heritor of the doctrines of Ash’arite, instead he classified modern science into two camps, that of the positive in term of Islamic interests and that of the negative. He adopts the positive one while keeping at bay the rest. Departing from Ian Barbour’s theory, this article categorizes Iqbal’s and Nursi’s adoption to science as integration. This article proposes that the method of Iqbal’s integration during his reconstruction on Islamic theology is an epistemological integration, meanwhile Nursi’s approach is ontological integration.
Co-Authors