Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional) Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional
Sari, Dyah Lupita
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
ANCAMAN STRATEGI HYBRID WARFARE RUSIA: SEBUAH PERSEPSI DAN MANIFESTASI KEBIJAKAN ESTONIA Dyah Lupita Sari
Review of International Relations Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional)
Publisher : UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/rir.v1i1.9302

Abstract

In recent years, Russia has developed a hybrid warfare strategy as a tactic to carry out war operations to achieve their national interests. Estonia is considered the most vulnerable country in the face of the threat of a Russian hybrid warfare strategy. In this case, Estonia has historical, geopolitical and political value for Russia. Estonia has received signs of the Russian threat manifested through their aggressive actions in Estonia with hybrid projections that have been projected in a real way. Thus, the Russian hybrid warfare strategy can influence the perception of the Estonian threat which was finally responded through a policy to stem the threat of hybrid itself. Underlying the analysis of the Threat Perception theory proposed by Raymond Cohen, this paper will explain how the Estonian threat is perceived by the Russian hybrid warfare strategy by looking at the threatening cue and responses to the  threats. This paper has the argument that the hybrid warfare strategy is a threat to Estonia. The historical factor of Russian-Estonian relations and past experience of threats is a sign of a threat that influences the perception of Estonian threats. Estimation of the threat was then manifested by Estonia in the form of anticipatory actions through increased cooperation with NATO, an increase in Estonia's military capabilities, and other non-military approaches in counter Russian warfare hybrid strategy. Keywords: Hybrid Warfare, Russia, Estonia, threat perception, threatening cue, asymmetric threat, cyber security, disinformation, NATO
FIVE POWER DEFENSE ARRANGEMENTS (FPDA) AND THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT IN THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN REGION Dyah Lupita Sari
Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan Vol 11, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jsdk.v11i2.3135

Abstract

Operation Protective Edge 2014: Justifikasi Israel terhadap Pelanggaran Hukum Internasional dalam Prinsip Just War Sari, Dyah Lupita
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 20, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The 2014 Gaza War is the third largest armed conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. After Hamas fired rockets and mortars into strategic areas of Israel, the latter launched Operation Protective Edge as a counterattack. The use of military force by both sides led to enormous collateral damage, especially in the Gaza Strip. Operation Protective Edge is considered by many to have violated International Humanitarian Law; its conduct is seen as inconsistent with the principles in Just War. In explaining why the violations of International Humanitarian Law in Operation Protective Edge can be justified by Israel, this study grounds its analysis on thorough examination of the principle of Just War. The paper argues that the following factors bolster Israel’s justification: 1. The strength of the the right to self-defense argument; 2. Depiction of Operation Protective Edge as a proportional military operation; 3. Predication of the war between Israel-Hamas as an asymmetric conflict; 4. U.S. support, which finds basis on UN Security Council resolutions.
Global Governance dan Bioteknologi: Monopoli Benih Transgenik oleh Monsanto dan Posisi World Trade Organization Sari, Dyah Lupita
Jurnal Paradigma Vol 26, No 2 (2022): July 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/paradigma.v26i2.7331

Abstract

World Trade Organization telah menetapkan Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) Agreement sebagai mekanisme baru dalam pengaturan terkait hak kekayaan intelektual. Tetapi, penerapan TRIPs Agreement banyak menimbulkan kontroversi di bidang aglikultur. Masalah yang terjadi adalah hak paten jelas memberikan perlindungan yang kuat dan tidak berasalan bagi industri bioteknologi. Hal itu bisa dimanfaatkan oleh perusahaan besar dan juga negara-negara maju untuk memonopoli benih transgenik yang dampaknya akan merugikan para petani-petani lokal—khususnya di negara berkembang—yang berdampak pada ketahanan pangan global. Dengan mendasarkan Analisa pada pendekatan Global Governance, tulisan ini membahas mengenai bagaimana posisi Global Governance—dalam hal ini WTO—dalam penerapan TRIPs Agreement dengan mengambil studi kasus monopoli benih transgenic oleh Monsanto. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan mengumpulkan data-data sekunder. Tulisan ini berargumen bahwa WTO sebagai Global Governance masih belum bisa mengatasi masalah monopoli benih transgenik karena sampai saat ini pun pembahasan ini belum selesai di dalam internal WTO sendiri.  Dalam pembuatan regulasinya, WTO kurang memperhatikan prinsip-prinsip dasarnya dalam melindungi dan memberi manfaat bagi negara-negara berkembang sehingga cenderung menguntungkan negara-negara maju atau perusahaan besar yang memiliki power.Kata Kunci: TRIPs Agreement, benih transgenik, World Trade Organization, Global Governance, Monopoli, Monsanto
Co-Authors