Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Rekontruksi Teori Partisipasi Politik Dalam Diskursus Pemikiran Politik Negara Nur Rohim Yunus; Muhammad Sholeh; Ida Susilowati
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 4, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v4i3.10289

Abstract

Abstract:Community involvement in a democratic party is important and must exist, because it is a manifestation of true democracy. Citizens are directly involved in the decision-making process, implementing decisions, influencing decision-making processes, influencing government policies, including relating to active involvement and passive involvement of each individual in the hierarchy of government political systems. All this involvement is known as a form of political participation. This study wants to rebuild political participation as a basic theory in the country's political thinking. So that the relationship can be drawn between the role of community political participation and the success of democracy itself.Keywords: Participation, Politics, Democracy Abstrak:Keterlibatan masyarakat dalam pesta demokrasi merupakan hal penting dan harus ada, karena ia merupakan perwujudan demokrasi yang sebenarnya. Warga negara terlibat langsung dalam proses pembuatan keputusan, melaksanakan keputusan, mempengaruhi proses pengambilan keputusan, mempengaruhi kebijakan pemerintah, termasuk berkaitan dengan keterlibatan aktif maupun keterlibatan pasif setiap individu dalam hierarki sistem politik pemerintahan. Semua keterlibatan ini dikenal sebagai bentuk partisipasi politik. Penelitian ini ingin membangun kembali partisipasi politik sebagai teori dasar dalam pemikiran politik negara. Sehingga dengannya dapat ditarik benang merah antara peran partisipasi politik masyarakat dengan kesuksesan demokrasi itu sendiri.Kata Kunci: Partisipasi, Politik, Demokrasi  
Resolusi Konflik Pencegahan Disintegrasi Bangsa Melalui Legalitas Hukum Syariat di Aceh Muhammad Sholeh; Nur Rohim Yunus; Ida Susilowati
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 3, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v3i3.7862

Abstract

Abstract:Efforts that have been made by the government of the Republic of Indonesia to reduce conflict in Aceh in the form of various policies. From the pattern of violence, mediation, enactment of the Regional Military Operation, to finally negotiations for peace. Negotiations eventually served as the final conflict resolution in order to quell the raging turmoil. After the Aceh Tsunami in December 2004, an agreement was finally reached in Helsinki between the government of the Republic of Indonesia and the elders of the Free Aceh Movement. Among the resolutions obtained are the enactment of Sharia law or Qonun in Aceh, as a legal law that regulates the life of the Acehnese in an Islamic manner.Keywords: Conflict Resolution, Sharia Law, National Disintegration Abstrak: Upaya yang telah dilakukan pemerintah Republik Indonesia dalam meredam konflik di Aceh dalam bentuk kebijakan beranekaragam. Dari pola kekerasaan, mediasi, pemberlakuan Daerah Operasi Militer, hingga perundingan untuk perdamaian. Perundingan akhirnya dijadikan sebagai resolusi konflik terakhir guna meredam gejolak yang berkecamuk. Pasca terjadinya Tsunami Aceh pada bulan Desember 2004, akhirnya dibuatkan kesepakatan di Helsinki antar pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan para tetua Gerakan Aceh Merdeka. Diantara resolusi yang didapatkan adalah pemberlakukan hukum Syariah atau Qonun di Aceh, sebagai hukum legal yang mengatur kehidupan masyarakat Aceh secara Islami. Kata Kunci: Resolusi Konflik, Hukum Syariah, Disintegrasi Bangsa
United States Intervention Against Terrorism in Iraq Ida Susilowati; Nur Rohim Yunus; Muhammad Sholeh
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 5, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v5i1.10372

Abstract

Abstract: Terrorism is a crime committed by a group of people to frighten, terrorize, intimidate a country's government. In the case of the September 11, 2001 terror that occurred at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the United States accused the al-Qaeda group of being behind the attack. Furthermore, the United States attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. America considers the attacks carried out are legitimate because they are carried out to reduce world terrorism crimes. Whereas behind that there is another motive for controlling the oil in the country that it attacked.Keywords: Terrorism, Intervention, United States. Abstrak:Terorisme merupakan kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh sekelompok orang guna menakuti, meneror, mengintimidasi pemerintahan suatu negara. Dalam kasus teror 11 September 2001 yang terjadi pada World Trade Center dan Pentagon, Amerika Serikat menuduh kelompok al-qaidah di balik serangan tersebut. Selanjutnya Amerika Serikat melakukan penyerangan terhadap Afghanistan dan Iraq. Amerika menganggap serangan yang dilakukan adalah sah karena dilakukan untuk meredam kejahatan terorisme dunia. Padahal di balik itu ada motif lain untuk menguasai minyak yang ada di negara yang diserangnya.Kata Kunci: Terrorisme, Intervensi, Amerika Serikat
Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as Putin's Political Communication Force Nur Rohim Yunus; Ida Susilowati; Muhammad Sholeh; Yan Kahnovich
ETTISAL : Journal of Communication Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): ETTISAL : Journal of Communication
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor collaboration with ISKI (Ikatan Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi Indo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/ejoc.v8i1.9945

Abstract

This article aims at discussing Vladimir Putin's use of constitutional amendments as a political communication tool. The 2020 amendments to the Russian Constitution have significant implications for Putin's political powers and communication strategies. This research explores Putin's role in the constitutional amendments using a qualitative methodology, a literature-based approach, and an analysis of laws and regulations. The study results indicate that Putin uses constitutional amendments to increase his authority and extend the President's term. One of the communication strategies employed is effectively utilizing media and communication channels to create a narrative supporting the amendment. Putin also uses nationalist rhetoric and Russian identity to legitimize his decisions. In addition, Putin controls state media and prioritizes messages that influence public opinion. Putin's political communication strategy includes manipulating propaganda and information to enhance his position, maintain public opinion, and obtain support.