Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

METODE PARTISIPATIF DALAM PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN DESA DI DESA PITU, KECAMATAN TOBELO TENGAH, KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA, PROVINSI MALUKU UTARA Frets Alfret Goraph; Ernest Sengi
Dharmakarya Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Juni, 2020
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/dharmakarya.v9i2.23774

Abstract

Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Wisata Pantai Desa Pitu yang berada di Kecamatan Tobelo Tengah Kabupaten Halmahera Utara masih terdapat permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh pengurus BUMDes Desa Pitu. Adapun permasalah BUMDes yang menjadi prioritas untuk dicarikan solusi pemecahan masalah, yaitu : 1) Tidak Ada Peraturan Desa Tentang Pungutan BUMDes Wisata Pantai; 2) Tidak ada Standar Pelayanan Sewa Banana Boat, Donat Boat, Parkir Sepada Motor & mobil, MCK, Perahu Bebek, Jembatan Pelangi, Listrik dan Air Bersih; 3) perlunya Penataan Administrasi BUMDes. Berdasarkan prioritas Permasalahan Mitra yang telah disepakati bersama di atas untuk diberikan solusi dan pemecahan masalah sebagai berikut: 1) Tim Program Kemitraan Masyarakat memberikan Bimbingan teknis dan pelatihan penyusunan peraturan desa dengan metode partisipatif, 2) Tim PKM bersama mitra membuat Standar Operasional Prosedur Pelayanan BUMDes Wisata Pantai; 3) Tim PKM membuat Penataan Administrasi BUMDes. Target Luaranpada kegiatan Program Kemitraan Masyarakat yaitu: 1) Pemerintah Desa Pitu memiliki peraturan desa tentang pungutan BUMDes Wisata Pantai; 2) Pemerintah Desa Pitu, Badan Pengurus BUMDes dan Kantor BUMDes memiliki tata kelola BUMDes yang baik; Berdasarkan hasil Program Kemitraan Masyarakat sebagai berikut; 1) Tersedianya Peraturan Desa tentang Pungutan Wisata Pantai; 2) Tersedia Standar Layanan Publik; 3) Terciptanya tata kelola Administrasi Bumdes semakin mandiri.
METODE PARTISIPATIF DALAM PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN DESA DI DESA PITU MALUKU UTARA Frets Alfret Goraph; Ernest Sengi
JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Vol 4, No 2 (2020): JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (448.63 KB) | DOI: 10.31764/jmm.v4i2.1948

Abstract

Abstrak: Pengabdian masyarakat dilaksanakan bersama mitra Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Wisata Pantai Desa Pitu Kecamatan Tobelo Tengah Kabupaten Halmahera Utara dengan tujuan a) meningkatkan tata kelola BUMDes yang lebih baik; b) meningkatkan pengetahuan badan pengerus BUMDes dan stakeholder terkait. Metode kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dilaksanakan sebagai berikut a) metode cerama Permendagri No. 111 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Peraturan di Desa; b) Praktik pembuatan peraturan desa tentang pungutan wisata pantai; c) Praktik pembuatan standard operasional prosedur; d) penataan administrasi BUMDes. Seluruh kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat turut berpartisipasi pengurus BUMDes, Pemerintah desa, BPD, pemilik warung dan stakeholder terkait. Hasil Program Kemitraan Masyarakat yang diperoleh Mitra BUMDes sebagai berikut; a) Tersedianya Peraturan Desa tentang Pungutan Wisata Pantai; b) Tersedia Standar Layanan Publik; c) Terciptanya tata kelola Administrasi Bumdes semakin mandiri.Abstract: Community service is carried out together with partners of the Village Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) Beach Tourism Pitu Village, Central Tobelo District, North Halmahera Regency with the aim a) improve better BUMD governance; b) increase the knowledge of the BUMDes management body and related stakeholders. The method of community service activities is carried out as follows: a) communicative method  at Permendagri no. 111 of 2014 concerning Technical Guidelines for Regulations in the Village; b) The practice of making village regulations regarding beach tourism levies; c) The practice of making standard operational procedures; d) set of BUMDes administration. All community service activities participated in the BUMDes management, village government, BPD, shop owners and related stakeholders. The results of the Community Partnership Program obtained by BUMDes Partners are as follows; a) The availability of Village Regulations concerning Beach Tourism Levies; b) Public Service Standards are available; c) The creation of Bumdes Administration governance is increasingly independent.
Kekerasan Terhadap Anak dalam Perspektif Kriminologi Di Kecamatan Tobelo Kabupaten Halmahera Utara Ernest Sengi; Alfonsisus Budiman
Wajah Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v4i2.227

Abstract

Children are the nation’s next generation who need to be protected from various forms of violence. The enactment of the law on the elimination of violence in household and the child protection law does not always directly proportional to the loss of violent behavior towards children. In this paper, the legal issue that will be examined is how the perspective of criminology in overcoming  violence against children in Tobelo Subdistrict North Halmahera Regency.  Then, to answer the legal issues used nondoctrinal legal research methods with a socio legal research approach that is supported by the statute approach. This approach is considered appropriate because the data on cases of violence against children in Tobelo sub-district will be described and then analyzed from this data to obtain a legal prescription on how the criminology views various forms of violence against children. The results showed that in 2015 to 2018 in Tobelo Subdistrict, North Halmahera Regency, there were 57 cases of violence against children. Besides, violence against children is a form of criminal activity in which the offender can be held liable either through general or special crimes.
KONSEP CULPA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA SUATU ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 18/Pid.B/2017/PN.TOBELO Ernest Sengi
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 17, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v17i2.5993

Abstract

The concept of omission or culpa from the legal aspect is very different from the concept of omission or culpa that is understood everyday. Many events include omission or culpa but the incident may not be a criminal act. Thus, law enforcement must be careful in giving meaning to a legal act related to omission. Court Decision Number 18 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.TOb. is a decision which is the object of research in this paper, in which the author disagrees about the concept of omission or culpa which is considered by the Tobelo District Court judge in that decision, although I agrees that the defendant's actions were omission. The analysis used is legal analysis using a statute approach and case approach so that it can find out the basis of the court's consideration of choosing Pasal 359 KUHP dropped against the defendant Imsal Ilahi Baksi. In its consideration, it was found that Tobelo District Court judges interpreted omission as " not careful " or " lack of attention" so that the defendant was proven legally and convincingly committed a crime of omission. Meanwhile, in the criminal law doctrine, many concepts of omission or culpa are not always interpreted as "not careful" or "lack of attention" such as omission in the sense of onbewuste schuld. Because of the fact, in this case the defendant was careful and gave attention by notifying his actions (installing electricity), but only did not imagine the possibility of consequences
Benarkah Praperadilan Menguji Aspek Formil (Analisis Hukum Penetapan Tersangka dalam Putusan Nomor: 01/Pid.Pra//2021/PN.Tob) Ernest Sengi
Wajah Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v6i2.901

Abstract

The determination of the suspect is the object of pretrial after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU-XII/2014. Pretrial only examines formal aspects; however the object of the pretrial relating to the determination of the suspect, the pretrial examination becomes a dilemma because it is always related to the examination of the fulfillment of the evidence which has actually entered the area of examination of the case material. In this paper, the legal issue being studied is the Pretrial Decision Number 01/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tob. who decides to reject the applicant’s pretrial application. On the other hand, the alleged criminal case can’t be tried until now because the Public Prosecutor  continuously returns the file (P-19) on the grounds that there is not enough evidence. To answer these legal issues, a normative legal research method with a case approach is used. This approach is to analyze the basis of judgesconsiderations in making decisions. The results of the study show that the Pretrial Decision Number 01/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Tob. did not consider in detail the Determination Of The Suspect. The judge does that so as not to get cought up in the examination of the case material; even though the determination of the suspect should have checked the fulfillment of the evidence in the framework of the formal aspect of the examination.