T. Safir Iskandar Wijaya
Univesitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Falsafat dan Tasawuf sebuah Misteri Peradaban (Dialog Pertemuan antara Pemikiran dan Perasaan, Problema Ibn Tufail dan Ibn 'Arabi) T. Safir Iskandar Wijaya
Islam Futura Vol 1, No 1 (2001): Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jiif.v1i1.5259

Abstract

In history, the development of Islamic thought includes of a variety of topics that were adopted later by both philosophers and Sufis. Indeed, the polemics frequently led to the murder of certain school leaders and its followers, such as in the case of Sufi leaders: Abu Mansur al Hallaj and Sharwardi al-maqtul. This is in contrast with Muslim philosophers, who still survived in spite of the fact that their thoughts were totally in opposite to theological tenets of society. Therefore, the question arise as to the relation between falsafah and tasawwuf. For this purpose, the idea of falsafah and tasawwuf of ‘Ibn Tufail and ‘Ibn ‘Arabi is worth studying. This study shows that both thinkers tried to combine these two subjects in achieving the truth; that is in spite of the fact that both falsafah and tasawwuf employed two different approaches in reaching the truth, the former through reason, while the later through define guidance.
Teologi Rasional Ijtihad Dan Dogmatis Taqlidi Penalaran Filsafat Kalam Teuku Safir Iskandar Wijaya
Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 19, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/substantia.v19i1.2916

Abstract

The ideas of rational theology and dogmatic theology are closely related to the concept of taqlid and ijtihad in the development of Islamic theological thought. Even, both theologies have caused serious debates among Islamic thinkers and mutakallim from time to time. In this relation, two different ideas arise; some say the door of ijtihad is closed for everything; in addition, there is also a view that the door of ijtihad only closed in relation to theological belief, and still open for muamalah problem, and law related to humanity problem. The question that arises in this connection is "why the previous theological problem as a result of political disputes becomes a dogma of justification and is seen getting a serious attention even to threaten the dispute between people and even between schools and schools. Furthermore, the ruler also uses certain schools to reinforce their power and position in politics. Theology, therefore, serves as the object of creating to the dogma and not dialectical knowledge. In fact, the easy answer is the logic of theology or aqidah is the justification of belief and belief itself does not open the opportunity for dialogue for the different schools and streams of aqidah it embraces. Theology, however, as a science cannot be separated from the various interpretations and understandings derived from a dhanni and relative and can not be separated from the various doubts and prejudices that can not be separated from the various possibilities of understanding.
Membangun Karakter Masyarakat Bangsa Berbasis Teologi Gerakan Spiritual Baru T. Safir Iskandar
Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 16, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/substantia.v16i2.4926

Abstract

The ideas for change can not be separated from the culture and civilization that  originated from the paradigm that produces new creativities when faced with social stagnation.  To solve the social problems, the sociological imagination ideas that exist and develop in the  society should be incorporated so that they become a theological value system from the  personal integrity of a community of nation. It is now the time for social imagination, as an  idea, to be raised by an awareness to create and stimulate various changes in collective  articulated discourses that deny the realities of social inequality established by the hegemony  of any interests in the form of weakening the integrity of the nation in the name of the state.  Theologically, for a successful and sustainable development of the nation there are six things  to be considered: first, put the truth as the purpose of life. Second, the community of nations  should not be restrained or restrain themselves both in thought and in social expression to the  extent not contrary to the universal values. Third, justice must be incorporated into all aspects  of society. Fourth, education must be provided to everyone. Fifth, critical thinking must be  nurtured to respond to everything that goes into the community of nation both from within and  from outside. And the last is the consistency and sincerity, dependability and sustainability of  the five points mentioned above.