Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Yeremias T Keban
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformasi Orientasi Dan Sistem Penilaian Konerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil: Mengapa Dan Bagaimana? Yeremias T Keban
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (918.982 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8333

Abstract

This article discuss two important subjects. First, it argues that Indonesian government should reform their performance appraisal system. Second, the recommendation to improve the performance appraisal system for civil servants. There are three reasons argued by the author of why Indonesian government should reform their performance appraisal system for civil servants: First, the system is not academic enough in term of the instruments which are used; second the method is not effective, lastly the system could not be used to diagnose to provide feed backs to improve the performance of the civil servants. To prevent the inefficiency, the author strongly suggest that the government should take immediate action to replace the old system with the new ones which is recommended from this article.
Capacity Building Sebagai Prakondisi dan Langkah Strategis bagi Perwujudan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia Yeremias T Keban
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (242.959 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8476

Abstract

Local government autonomy in development has not been successfully materialized in Indonesia although there has been a policy breakthrough with the stipulation of new acts on decentralisation or local government. It is explained that the new acts implementation is still constrained by: 1) strategic failure in implementing local autonomy, 2) misconception about decentralisation and governance autonomy, 3) different perspectives among the political elites, 4) strong grip of centralised bureaucracy, and 5) the loose control from the legislatives and the public at large. It is also argued that local government have to deal with such constraints because the lack of capability to administer development in a decentralised context which implies that capacity building is extremely urgent for the local autonomy. Furthermore, capacity building for the local government officials can only be accomplished if there is an appropriate approach and strategy. This article recommends some practical guidance for the capacity building programmes to meet the requirement, namely: 1) strategic intervention, 2) institutional building, 3) action programme, and 4) continual improvement. At the bottom line, all the capacity building programmes should be able to convince the local government officials about the importance of local government vision for development, human resources improvement, local institutions' revitalisation, organisational networking, and understanding the context of local development.
Reformasi Orientasi Dan Sistem Penilaian Konerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil: Mengapa Dan Bagaimana? Yeremias T Keban
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 9, No 1 (2005): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8333

Abstract

This article discuss two important subjects. First, it argues that Indonesian government should reform their performance appraisal system. Second, the recommendation to improve the performance appraisal system for civil servants. There are three reasons argued by the author of why Indonesian government should reform their performance appraisal system for civil servants: First, the system is not academic enough in term of the instruments which are used; second the method is not effective, lastly the system could not be used to diagnose to provide feed backs to improve the performance of the civil servants. To prevent the inefficiency, the author strongly suggest that the government should take immediate action to replace the old system with the new ones which is recommended from this article.
Capacity Building Sebagai Prakondisi dan Langkah Strategis bagi Perwujudan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia Yeremias T Keban
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 3, No 2 (1999): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8476

Abstract

Local government autonomy in development has not been successfully materialized in Indonesia although there has been a policy breakthrough with the stipulation of new acts on decentralisation or local government. It is explained that the new acts implementation is still constrained by: 1) strategic failure in implementing local autonomy, 2) misconception about decentralisation and governance autonomy, 3) different perspectives among the political elites, 4) strong grip of centralised bureaucracy, and 5) the loose control from the legislatives and the public at large. It is also argued that local government have to deal with such constraints because the lack of capability to administer development in a decentralised context which implies that capacity building is extremely urgent for the local autonomy. Furthermore, capacity building for the local government officials can only be accomplished if there is an appropriate approach and strategy. This article recommends some practical guidance for the capacity building programmes to meet the requirement, namely: 1) strategic intervention, 2) institutional building, 3) action programme, and 4) continual improvement. At the bottom line, all the capacity building programmes should be able to convince the local government officials about the importance of local government vision for development, human resources improvement, local institutions' revitalisation, organisational networking, and understanding the context of local development.
Co-Authors