Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal POLITIK INDEPENDEN: Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global
Hamka Hendra Noer
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Birokrasi Politik dan Perilaku Korupsi Hamka Hendra Noer
POLITIK Vol 10, No 2 (2014): POLITIK
Publisher : POLITIK

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakBirokrasi, politik dan tindak korupsi sudah sangat lain dimaknai masyarakat mempunyai kedekatan. Banyak faktor dan fakta yang memperlihatkan hal itu. Oceh karena itu, dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif, maka akan sangat menarik mengkaji pengaruh birokrasi, politik terhadap perilaku korupsi di Indonesia, sehingga dapat kita ketahui jika praktik korupsi di kalangan birokrasi tidak sekadar disebabkan oleh perilaku yang abnormal, sistem yang melandasi perilaku itu sendiri juga dalam kondisi abnormal. Kata Kunci: Birokrasi, Politik, Perilaku Korupsi AbstractThe bureaucracy, politics, and corruption behavior are known by the society as one for another. As we can see it is proven by number of factors and fact towards the situation. Hence,  by using qualitative methods, it would be even interesting to analyze the impact of bureaucracy; such political situation towards corruption behavior in Indonesia, therefore we shall find if the corruption in bureaucracy is caused by both abnormal behavior also its own system.   Keywords: Bureaucracy, Politics, Corruption Behavior
PERANG DAN KEAMANAN DALAM TINJAUAN TEORI NEOREALISME DAN INSTITUSIONALISME Hamka Hendra Noer
Independen Vol 3, No 1 (2022): INDEPENDEN: Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global
Publisher : Independen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/independen.3.1.25-36

Abstract

The theory of neorealism stated that the strong and powerful will dominate and monopolize the world, whereas the insignificant will become marginalized. This concept was focused on gaining benefits rather than having a profound cooperation between countries. However, the said theory which also believed in pro-war (propaganda) has been argued by institutionalism theory. The institutionalism theory proposed that the outbreak of war may be caused by a failure in political institutions. Therefore, safety issues were more than military affairs but national security and economic relations between countries. The conspicuous objectives between those theories were that the institutionalists believed in sustainable cooperation of both parties to achieve an absolute benefit, whereas the neorealists relied on gaining advantages in cooperation. The article uses the library research and implements a qualitative-critical descriptive on the research method.  Discourse analysis is carried out to prevent an overlapping data in the data analysis. In conclusion, theory of neorealism implements a domination by monopolizing power to elude a cooperation to occurred. Meanwhile, the institutionalism theory would prioritize on finding a win-win solution to resolve conflict in order to evade war. 
Co-Authors