<![CDATA[Penulisan studi kasus ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ketepatan pertimbangan hakim mengenai pembelaan terpaksa dan mengetahui proporsionalitas sanksi yang dijatuhkan terhadap anak serta kesesuaiannya dengan tujuan pemidanaan terhadap anak. Studi kasus ini ditulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan teknik deskriptif analitis. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim mengenai pembelaan terpaksa pada perbuatan terdakwa anak kurang tepat karena terdapat tigal hal mengenai pembelaan terpaksa yang telah terpenuhi. Kemudian, berdasarkan berbagai pertimbangan hakim dalam putusannya, penjatuhan sanksi pidana pembinaan dalam lembaga di LKSA Darul Aitam selama 1 (satu) tahun terhadap terdakwa anak sudah proporsional dan sesuai dengan tujuan pemidanaan terhadap anak. Writing this case study aims to determine the accuracy of judges' judgment regarding forced defense and to know the proportionality of the sanctions imposed on the defendant and its suitability with the purpose of condemnation to the child. This case study was written using juridical-normative research methods with descriptive-analytical techniques. The results showed that the judges' considerations regarding duress of defendant’s actions were incorrect because there were three things regarding duress that had been fulfilled. Then, based on the various considerations of the judge in her decision, the imposition of criminal sanctions by guidance in institutions at LKSA Darul Aitam for 1 (one) year against the defendant is proportional and following the purpose of condemnation to the child.]]>
