Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP Faisal Faisal; Muhammad Rustamaji
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p08

The basic idea underlying the reform of the Criminal Code Bill has an impact on reforming the pillars of criminal law. The purpose of this research is to find out the new direction of criminal law policy regarding criminal acts, criminal responsibility and punishment. The research method uses normative legal research. The results of the research study in the discussion section are the reform of the pillars of criminal law, namely criminal acts, criminal liability, and punishment oriented to the basic idea of ??the value of balance. The reform of the pillars of criminal acts is aimed at broadening the meaning of the legality principle which provides space for living law as a source of law and also creates juridical terminology regarding criminal acts. The pillar of criminal responsibility accommodates the principle of no crime without error. The pillar of punishment is that the purpose of punishment is no longer synonymous with retaliation, but there are efforts to improve the behavior of the perpetrators of crime. The changes in the three pillars are influenced by the basic idea of ??balancing the values ??of Pancasila, namely the values ??of Divinity, Humanity, and Society. Recommendations in strengthening the direction of criminal law reform are needed in formulating criminal provisions outside the Draft Criminal Code that must be in accordance with the basic idea of ??balance which is the ideal of criminal law reform law. Ide dasar yang melandasi pembaruan RUU KUHP berdampak pada pembaruan pilar hukum pidana. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui arah baru kebijakan politik hukum pidana mengenai tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana dan pemidanaan. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian penelitian dalam bagian pembahasan ialah pembaruan pilar hukum pidana yakni tindak pidana, pertanggungjawaban pidana, dan pemidanaan berorientasi pada ide dasar nilai keseimbangan. Pembaruan pilar tindak pidana tertuju pada perluasan makna asas legalitas yang memberikan ruang pada hukum yang hidup sebagai sumber hukum dan melahirkan pula terminologi yuridis mengenai tindak pidana. Pilar pertangungjawaban pidana mengakomodasi asas tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan. Pilar pemidanaan bahwa tujuan pemidanaan tidak lagi identik pembalasan akan tetapi ada upaya memperbaiki perilaku dari pelaku kejahatan. Perubahan ketiga pilar tersebut dipengaruhi oleh ide dasar keseimbangan nilai Pancasila yaitu nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemasyarakatan. Rekomendasi dalam memperkuat arah pembaruan hukum pidana diperlukan dalam merumuskan ketentuan pidana di luar RUU KUHP harus sesuai dengan ide dasar keseimbangan yang menjadi cita hukum pembaruan hukum pidana

Biomijuridika: Pemikiran Ilmu Hukum Pidana Berketuhanan dari Barda Nawawi Arief Muhammad Rustamaji
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

This article discusses the legal thought from Barda Nawawi Arief, named biomijuridika. The concept of biomijuridika is actually an invitation for legal learner to reflect on whether the life of law and the development of law in Indonesia are secular. If jurisprudence contains in it the science of “regulating or arranging”, Barda questioned is not “God Most Regulating and Arranging”, and therefore the law must also be in accordance with God’s teachings. Therefore according to Barda, legal education and legal science in Indonesia should not be secular. Consequently, legal education and national law must also explore and examine the law of the One Godhead. This article shows that in the Indonesian context, the biomijuridika of Barda are actually in line with the Pancasila as the state foundation. On the basis of Pancasila, the life of the nation and state of Indonesia must be based on the Pancasila, which in the life of the law means must, one of them, be based on the One Godhead. However, the legal thought of biomijuridika from Barda still seems to leave a discourse space that seems to have not been answered thoroughly, namely when this concept was proposed as one of the alternative models of legal reform especially in the field of criminal law. Such criticism in particular can be examined in the facets of the development of theoretical and practical law. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas pemikiran hukum dari Barda Nawawi Arief yang diberi nama biomijuridika. Konsep biomijuridika sejatinya sebuah ajakan bagi pembelajar hukum untuk merenung tentang apakah kehidupan berhukum dan pengembangan hukum di Indonesia bersifat sekuler. Jika ilmu hukum mengandung di dalamnya ilmu “mengatur atau menata”, Barda mempertanyakan bukankah “Tuhan Maha Mengatur dan Maha Menata”, dan karenanya hukum pun mesti sesuai dengan ajaran Tuhan. Oleh karenanya menurut Barda pendidikan hukum dan ilmu hukum di Indonesia seharusnya tidak bersifat sekuler. Konsekuensinya, pendidikan tinggi hukum dan ilmu hukum nasional harus juga menggali dan mengkaji ilmu hukum berketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam konteks Indonesia, biomijuridika dari Barda sesungguhnya sejalan dengan dasar negara Pancasila. Dengan dasar negara Pancasila, maka kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara Indonesia mesti didasarkan pada Pancasila, yang dalam kehidupan berhukum berarti mesti, salah satunya, didasarkan pada “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa”. Namun demikian, pemikiran hukum biomijuridika dari Barda tampaknya masih menyisakan ruang diskursus yang agaknya belum dijawab dengan tuntas, yaitu ketika konsep ini diajukan sebagai salah satu model alternatif pembaruan hukum utamanya pada bidang hukum pidana. Kritik demikian khususnya dapat dicermati pada faset pengembanan hukum teoretis dan pengembanan hukum praktis.

PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PEMIDANAAN TERDAKWA ANAK DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN Seno Satrio Heryadi; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96046

This research in legal writing aims to examine the judge's considerations in giving a criminal decision in a criminal case of theft with aggravating circumstances in decision number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN SKH. who imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) months based on Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Code concerning Aggravated Theft and Based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used is the case approach, the case approach is an approach carried out by examining cases that relate to legal issues and have received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research is library research. The legal material obtained is then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, research results were obtained which showed that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was in accordance with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Procedure Code and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal Procedure.

TELAAH STRATEGI PEMBUKTIAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA YANG DIJATUHI HUKUMAN MATI Dwi Wahyu Septiansyah; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.88479

This research aims to analyze the public prosecutor’s evidentiary strategy in proving criminal elements and the judge’s legal considerations or ratio decidendi in deciding to impose the death penalty for narcotics crimes in the case of Decision Number 501/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm. This research is prescriptive doctrinal legal research. The types of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material sources used include primary and secondary legal material sources. The technique for collecting legal materials used is literature study from books, statutory regulations and related legal documents. Analysis of legal materials using the deductive syllogism method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it was found that the public prosecutor’s evidentiary strategy in case Number: 501/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm was carried out using several strategies, namely an evidentiary strategy based on evidence presented at trial, an evidentiary strategy based on articles used in the indictment, and the evidentiary strategy uses splitting which results in the maximum verdict, namely the death penalty. The judge’s legal considerations in handing down his decision are based on juridical considerations (Public Prosecutor’s indictment, Defendant’s statement, Witness testimony, Expert testimony, evidence, and articles in criminal law regulations) and non-juridical considerations (background of the Defendant’s actions, consequences the Defendant’s actions, the Defendant’s personal condition, and the Defendant’s religion) in rendering a criminal decision.

DISHARMONI KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA PRODUK HUKUM NOMOKRASI Putri Balqis Salsabila; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96314

Observing at Perpol No. 08/2021, Perja No. 15/2020, and Perma No. 01/2024, reveals a number of significant problems that require comprehensive evaluation. Although the three regulations are expected to be an instrument for the transformation of the criminal justice system towards a more humane, responsive, and just approach, a critical study shows that there is an urgent need to conduct a comprehensive review. The main focus of the review includes aspects of definitions, principles, criminal punishment limitations, loss assessment, and criminal offence exceptions. The normative research conducted using primary and secondary legal materials thus uses a conceptual approach that focuses on examining the concept of restorative justice and its disharmony in each legal product. Through deductive syllogism analysis, the research identified disharmony in the implementation of the concept of restorative justice. Fundamental differences are clearly visible in terms of definitions, requirements, and the scope of criminal offences that can be resolved through restorative justice mechanisms.

KEBIJAKAN PAJAK PROGRESIF BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN (BPHTB) DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN PAJAK DAN POTENSI SENGKETA DI PERADILAN PAJAK ) Hilma Syita El Asith; Muhammad Rustamaji; Jadmiko Anom Husodo
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.110762

Progressive BPHTB taxation constitutes a regional fiscal policy that functions not only as a revenue-raising (budgetary) instrument but also as a regulatory (regulerend) mechanism aimed at realizing social justice through a more equitable and fair distribution of land ownership. This study seeks to analyze the progressive taxation rules applicable to BPHTB from the perspective of tax justice and to identify potential disputes that may arise, as well as the role of the Tax Court in their resolution.The method employed in this study is a normative-juridical approach with a qualitative orientation. Its application relies on secondary data, encompassing primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books and scholarly journals. The discussion demonstrates that, philosophically, progressive taxation on BPHTB represents Aristotle’s concept of distributive justice, John Rawls’s difference principle, and modern theories of tax justice based on the ability-to-pay principle. All three emphasize proportional tax burdens according to individual capacity. The resulting tax revenues are subsequently utilized to enhance public welfare, particularly for groups considered less advantaged.Nevertheless, in practice, there is potential for disputes arising from disharmony between norms and their implementation, such as differences in the interpretation of the Tax Object Acquisition Value (NPOP), variations in Non-Taxable Acquisition Value (NOPTKP) policies among regions, and the perception that the application of progressive BPHTB taxation is disproportionate. The Tax Court plays a crucial role as a corrective mechanism to regional fiscal policies through objection, appeal, and judicial review procedures, ensuring that progressive BPHTB taxation remains within the legal framework and adheres to the principles of tax justice. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, transparency in determining NPOP, and the strengthening of the Tax Court are necessary to achieve a fair and sustainable regional taxation system.

KONSEP IDEAL DIGITAL EVIDENCE CRYPTOCURRENCY DALAM PERBANDINGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA, JEPANG, DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Angelina Agung Putri Zaman; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.97834

This article analyzes the legal comparison in proving digital evidence for money laundering crimes through virtual currencies (cryptocurrency) in Indonesia, Japan, and the United States. The purpose of this article is to derive an ideal concept from a comparative study of digital evidence in Japan and the United States that can be applied in Indonesia. This research employs normative legal research with a prescriptive nature. The approaches used in this research are the Conceptual Approach and the Comparative Approach. The legal materials utilized consist of primary and secondary sources, gathered through literature study. The analysis of legal materials in this study employs the deductive syllogism method. The findings indicate the need for reform in Indonesia's legal system to handle cryptocurrency digital evidence by adopting best practices from Japan and the United States.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search