Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal Evidence Of Law
Muh. Jufri Ahmad
Dosen Fakultas Hukum – Untag Surabaya
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Jufri Ahmad, Muh.
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 13 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i13.257

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan yang mengadili menurut hukum dengan tidak membeda-bedakan orang, tidak dapat diterapkan sebagaimana mestinya karena  kejahatan yang dilakukan anak, maupun anak menjadi saksi dan korban, akan membawa dapak psikis terhadap anak. Pemeriksaan sampai proses persidangan anak secara yuridis maupun aspek-aspek sosiologis-kriminologis harus melindungi hak-hak asasi anak.
Anak Menjadi Korban Eksploitasi (Perkawinan Paksa) Oleh Orang Tua Fathur Rozi, Achmad; Jufri Ahmad, Muh.
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v2i3.418

Abstract

The situation of children being used as collateral for debts is a common thing due to the inability of parents to pay the debt. This incident is also more common when debt involves loan sharks. This incident certainly requires government oversight. The writing method used is the normative juridical research method. The legal research methodology in question is research based on applicable laws and regulations as well as other documents relevant to the discussion as supporting research material. The research findings show that the Child Welfare Law treats guarantees for children who are subject to debt guarantees as a crime that violates the provisions of Article 76I juncto Article 88 because it is classified as an act of economic exploitation of children. The viewpoint of the Islamic religion is not much different from the provisions of national law. Judging from the agreement, the actions taken by the creditor in accepting children according to Islamic law are inappropriate, because they do not meet the requirements of the kafalah contract. Children are not legal objects because they are not assets that can be mortgaged, nor are they legal objects that can be used as collateral because children do not have legal authority
Co-Authors Fathur Rozi, Achmad