Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Suplementasi Seng dan Probiotik pada Diare Akut Cair Anak Fenty Karuniawati; Budi Santosa; Endang Purwaningsih; Bambang Hariyana
MEDIA MEDIKA INDONESIANA 2010:MMI VOLUME 44 ISSUE 1 YEAR 2010
Publisher : MEDIA MEDIKA INDONESIANA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (176.883 KB)

Abstract

Backgrounds: Clinical trials have demonstrated that zinc supplement during diarrhea episodes reduces the duration and severity of illness. Studies have shown that probiotic may be useful in treating acute diarrhea. Study that evaluated diet enriched with zinc and probiotic showed significant reduction on the duration of diarrhea. Whether this combination is better than either supplementation of zinc or probiotic alone is unknown. The objective of the study was to compare the duration of diarrhea among children with acute watery diarrhea given zinc, probiotic and combined zinc - probiotic supplementation.Methods: Consecutive sampling from 6-24 months old hospitalized children with acute watery diarrhea in Kariadi hospital was done. There were 77 subjects randomized into 4 study groups. Three groups were supplemented daily with zinc, probiotic, or zinc and probiotic and one group as control. Each group had received standard therapy including rehydration and dietetic. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test, t test and one way ANOVA.Results: There were no differences in age, breastfeeding history, nutritional and social economic status, day before admission, and level of zinc serum among groups. Supplemented group showed significant reduction on the duration of diarrhea compared with control (p=0.02). There was no significant difference on the duration of diarrhea between zinc-probiotic and zinc or probiotic groups (p=0.15). Zinc-probiotic supplemented group had the lowest duration of diarrhea among groups.Conclusions: Zinc and probiotic are able to reduce the duration of acute watery diarrhea.ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Berbagai uji klinis menunjukkan suplementasi seng menurunkan durasi dan beratnya diare. Suplementasi probiotik juga menunjukkan manfaat pada terapi diare akut. Penelitian tentang diet yang difortifikasi seng dan probiotik menunjukkan penurunan durasi diare secara bermakna. Belum diketahui apakah suplementasi seng dan probiotik secara kombinasi lebih baik dari pada suplementasi seng dan probiotik secara terpisah. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan durasi diare pada anak yang dirawat dengan diare akut cair yang diberikan suplementasi seng, probiotik, kombinasi seng dan probiotik serta kontrol.Metoda: Subjek diambil secara konsekutif dari anak usia 6-24 bulan yang dirawat dengan diare akut cair di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. Didapatkan 77 subjek dan diacak menjadi 4 kelompok. Tiga kelompok diberi perlakuan berupa suplementasi seng saja, suplementasi probiotik saja atau kombinasi seng dan probiotik serta satu kelompok sebagai kontrol. Setiap kelompok mendapat terapi standar berupa rehidrasi dan dietetik. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji Chi-square, t test dan one way ANOVA.Hasil: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada umur, riwayat pemberian ASI, status gizi dan sosial ekonomi, lama sakit sebelum dirawat, dan kadar seng serum diantara keempat kelompok. Kelompok suplementasi mempunyai penurunan durasi diare yang bermakna dibandingkan kontrol (68,6 vs 83,8 jam, p=0,02). Tidak didapatkan perbedaan bermakna antara kelompok kombinasi seng dan probiotik dibandingkan kelompok seng atau probiotik saja (p=0,15). Kelompok seng dan probiotik mempunyai durasi diare paling pendek dibandingkan kelompok lain.
Perbedaan status gizi, kesegaran jasmani, dan kualitas hidup anak sekolah di pedesaan dan perkotaan Maria Mexitalia; Hendriani Sellina; Mohammad Syarofil Anam; Aya Yoshimura; Taro Yamauchi; Nurkukuh Nurkukuh; Bambang Hariyana
Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia Vol 8, No 4 (2012): April
Publisher : Minat S2 Gizi dan Kesehatan, Prodi S2 IKM, FK-KMK UGM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ijcn.18216

Abstract

Background: The differences in geographic, sosioeconomic and lifestyle between children in rural and urban areas infl uence their nutritional status. The urban children tended to be less active. The evidence suggested that physical activity improves cardiorespiratory fi tness and mental health in young people but study that compare those indicators among rural and urban children was scarce.Objective: To compare the nutritional status, physical fi tness, and quality of life between elementary school children in rural and urban areas.Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Semarang (urban) and Mlonggo (rural) Central Java in 2009. Inclusion criteria was school children aged 9-11 years and had no physical disability. Body composition was measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, physical activity by Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), physical fi tness by 20-m shuttle run test and quality of life by Pediatrics Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedQoL 4.0). The differences between nutritional status and physical activity were assessed by Chi Square test, while the differences between physical fi tness and quality of life were tested by independent t test (p<0.05).Result: One hundred sixty-two subjects were enrolled in the study (Semarang 82 students; 36 boys, 46 girls and Mlonggo 80 students; 40 boys, 40 girls). Body mass index (18.97 vs 15.16 kg/m2) and body fat (26.03% vs 18.03%) of urban children were higher than that of the rural’s (p<0.001). Children in rural area were signifi cantly more active, have higher physical fi tness level (VO2 max 28.54±1.79 ml/kg/min vs 21.57+1.79 ml/kg/min) (p<0.01), and have higher score in quality of life (2243 + 295,8) compared to the children from urban area (2133 + 369.4) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Rural school children have lower nutritional status than urban children, but they are more active and have higher physical fi tness level. They also have better quality of life.