Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA DILIHAT DARI PASAL 18 B AYAT 2 UUD 1945 Hanif Nurcholis
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 43, No 1 (2014): Masalah-Masalah Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (117.015 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.43.1.2014.149-159

Abstract

The status of Village has still been outside of the government bureucratic-system. It is still being positioned as a community that regulated by State and given the governmental tasks. The Law Number 6/ 2014 regarding The Village not includes it into the local government system. This research was conducted in Wilalung Village. The aim of it was to evaluate whether or not the Village in practice has been currently relevant with Article 18 B Verse (2) of Constitution 1945. The Data were collected through several ways: field observation, in-depth interview, focus group discussion, and literature study. This study found that regulation of Village is on the out side bases of the Article 18 B Verse (2).Therefore, the Village-Administration needs to be restructured and into the local government system.
PEMERINTAHAN DESA: “UNIT PEMERINTAHAN PALSU” DALAM SISTEM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA (Kasus Desa Jabon Mekar, Parung, Kabupaten Bogor) Hanif Nurcholis
Jurnal Politica Vol 5, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Politica
Publisher : Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jp.v5i1.337

Abstract

Rural government is the lowest level of Indonesian administrative system under regency or city and province. Itsexistence under the Dutch colonial era is admitted as part of the colonial government’s recognition to customary law. There was, however, a new dynamic in post-independence era, during which under Law No. 19/1965, its role was diminished, and after the enactment of law No. 5/1979, its existence has been admitted again. Using its public administration point of analysis, this paper generates question whether or not the rural government similar with local state government, local self government or non-government organization. To answer this question, the writer conducted field research in Jabon Mekar, applying observation method, combining with in-depth interview, document studies. Data was also gathered from FGD, and further analyzed by using descriptive-qualitative method. From this empirical research, the writer concludes that rural government could be considered as a pseudo-government body.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATIONAL DECENTRALIZATION POLICY Hanif Nurcholis
JIANA ( Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ) Vol 11, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (158.909 KB) | DOI: 10.46730/jiana.v11i1.1722

Abstract

The research explain theimplementation of educational decentralization policy in the Tangerang Regency, Banten Province,Indonesia. The research is intended to answer the question, “Why the output of the implementationof educational decentralization didn’t meet with society’s expectation”. This research used qualitativeapproach because to understand of empirical phenomenon. Based on qualitative method, researcherplays as main instrument. Observation, in-depth interview, focus group discussion, and documentarystudy were used for submitting the data. To answer of research problem, used theories of EdwardsIII. The research found that result of implement educational decentralization policy in TangerangRegency not accordance with the society’s expectation. There were five factors caused: (1) It hadnot developed operational legal framework on the function given, (2) It had not made operationalagent organization where design, enrollment, instruction, and function suitable with its functions,(3) It had not allocated their adequate fund to carry out educational service; (4) The operationalagent had not been able to set comprehensive and operational planning, and (5) Educational apparatuscould not practice qualified learning process.Key words: educational decentralization policy, legal framework, comprehensive planning.