Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences
Roy Marthen Moonti
Faculty of Law, Gorontalo University
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Evidence Of Seal Breaking Or Safety Sign In Crime Of Customs Rustam Hs Akili; Roy Marthen Moonti; Sulfadli Aliah
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 1 No 5 (2022): IJHESS-APRIL 2022
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (624.503 KB) | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v1i5.137

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the proof of damage to seals or security signs in customs crimes at Gorontalo customs and excise office and to find out what factors influence the proof of damage to seals in customs crimes at Gorontalo customs and excise office. Implementation This research is doctrinal legal research, namely research that provides systematic exposure to regulations governing certain legal categories, analyzes the relationship between regulations, explains areas that experience obstacles, and predicts future developments. The forms of proof of the crime of destroying the seal or security sign in the customs sector can be carried out by importers, exporters, law enforcement officers, entrepreneurs managing customs services, by legal entities, and individuals. Customs crimes can cause losses to the state, so prevention and law enforcement efforts, especially the application of criminal sanctions, are a means that can prevent and eradicate customs crimes. To prevent the occurrence of other forms of criminal acts in the customs sector, especially the destruction of security seals/signs, it is necessary to coordinate and cooperate between government agencies and law enforcement officers as well as the community to carry out supervision in the form of monitoring all customs activities and evaluating and reporting and taking action if there are activities. which violates Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 10 of 1995 concerning Customs. For the Government to establish a special prison or detention center for perpetrators of the crime of breaking the security seal in Gorontalo province at the Customs and Excise Office of Gorontalo, to facilitate the investigation process. And without the participation of the community, law enforcement will not be achieved optimally, public awareness to obey the law is very much needed and increases the role model for the community itself
Analysis of the Dispute Settlement of the Authority of State Institutions Based on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Arifin Tumuhulawa; Roy Marthen Moonti; Yusril Katili
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 1 No 6 (2022): IJHESS-JUNE 2022
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.176

Abstract

Objective of study is to identify and analyze dispute resolution on the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) by the Constitutional Court as regulated in the constitution, the fourth amendment to Article 24C paragraph 1 UUD 1945. By using a normative juridical research method and analytical descriptive, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a casuistic approach. Disputes on authority between state institutions are caused by the first; an inadequate system to regulate and oversee relations between existing institutions, secondly; Different interpretations of a provision, third; The mechanism of checks and balances on an equal relationship is possible in the implementation of the authority of each state institution, differences and/or disputes arise in interpreting the mandate of the Constitution, fourthly there is overlapping authority, and fifthly, there is authority of state institutions whose authority is obtained from the constitution or the 1945 Constitution carried out by other state institutions. Disputes involving state institutions that are not the main state organs (constitutional state organs) can be resolved at the Constitutional Court on the condition that the state institutions have constitutional importance.
Co-Authors Arifin Tumuhulawa Rustam Hs Akili Sulfadli Aliah Yusril Katili