Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lingua Scientia Journal
I Ketut Seken
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Some Notes on Linguistic Politeness and Its Relation to Second Language Teaching I Ketut Seken
Lingua Scientia Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ls.v18i1.16038

Abstract

Linguists’ interest in pragmatics is growing fast as the result of a major shift of attention to language as behavior. This growth should bring about awareness among second language teaching practitioners of the importance of incorporating pragmatic skills in all venues of their teaching. Linguistic politeness is one major area of concern in pragmatics and one that has much been thought of as being directly relevant to people’s communicative behaviors in social interaction. As second language teaching is meant to help learners acquire the competence to use the target language in real communication, this competence should enbed, among others, pragmatic abilities, which enable them to use the language appropriately politely. Second language learners need to be socialized and sensitized to politeness tactics and strategies in the target language because to be able to communicate well in the target language they have to master the tactics and strategies of politeness in that language. It is hardly enough that second language teachers only engage them in learning the structure and vocabulary of the target language without giving them competence in using the language to communicate naturally by applying politeness norms appropriate to the interactional situation.
An Analysis of Jargon Used by Receptionists in Front Office at Asa Bali Luxury Villas and Spa Seminyak I Putu Citra Yudha; I Ketut Seken
Lingua Scientia Vol. 23 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ls.v23i1.16066

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mendeskripsikan bentuk linguistik, arti dan fungsi jargon yang digunakan oleh resepsionis pada front office di Asa Bali Luxury Villa and Spa Seminyak. Jargon dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori dari Allan &Buridge (2006). Penelitian ini di desain menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Jargon yang di identifikasi adalah jargon yang digunakan dalam bentuk lisan dan tertulis. Tehknik - tehknik yang digunakan dalam mengumpulkan data adalah observasi, dokumentasi dan interview. Dalam hasil penelitian, ditemukan 123 jargon yang digunakan oleh resepsionis di front office Asa Bali Villa and Spa. Arti dari jargon -jargon yang digunakan didefinisikan berdasaran interview pada staff villa, dokumen resepsionis, kamus, dan konteks penggunaan jargon. Data analisis menunjukan terdapat dua fungsi jargon.
An Analysis of Politeness Strategies Used by Female and Male Students in XI IIS Of SMA Bhaktiyasa Singaraja to Talk to Their Teachers Inside and Outside the Classroom N W Sugitariani; I Ketut Seken; I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra
Lingua Scientia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ls.v23i2.16071

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the types of politeness strategies used by female and male students of XI IIS of SMA Bhaktiyasa Singaraja to talk to their teachers inside and outside the classroom and the reason of using those strategies. The researcher was the key instrument in this study that collected the data by audio-recording the conversation between students and teachers, taking note of the phenomena and interviewing the subject of the study. The subjects of the study were the students in XI IIS of SMA Bhaktiyasa Singaraja who talked to their teachers. The politeness strategies used by students were analyzed based on Brown & Levinson’s theory of politeness. The result of this study showed that the strategies used by female and male students were bald on record politeness, positive politeness, and off record. Mostly, the students used impolite language which can be stated as pragmatic errors because the students’ motive was to get closer to the teachers so they used impolite language. It was different from the previous studies that indicated positive politeness strategy most used by speaker in formal situation. The result of this study indicated that the students used politeness strategies rarely even when they talked to their teachers in the classroom activities. The students’ reasons of using the impolite language most frequently than politeness strategies because they felt they were close with the teachers so that they used impolite language to show their friendliness.
An Analysis of Grammatical Errors Committed by the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in Writing Recount Text in Academic Year 2014/2015 L A Purnayatri; I Ketut Seken; L D.S. Adnyani
Lingua Scientia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ls.v23i2.16075

Abstract

The present study aimed at 1) finding the types of grammatical errors committed by the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in writing recount text in academic year 2014/2015; and 2) finding the sources of the errors committed by the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Baturiti in writing recount text in academic year 2014/2015. This study was designed as descriptive-qualitative study. The methods used to collectdata were document analysis and interview. The instruments used were project and interview guide. The data in this study were analyzed by using data analysis theory proposed by Miles and Hubarman. The types of grammatical errors used in this study were based on the surface strategy taxonomy proposed by Dulayat alwhile the sources of the errors were based on the combination of theories proposed by Richards and Brown. Model of error analysis used in this study was the one proposed by Gass and Selinker. The result of the study showed that the subject committed 167 errors in their writing, namely misformation (29.94%), addition (27.54%), omission (24.55%), and misordering (17.96%).
Co-Authors I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra I Putu Citra Yudha L A Purnayatri L D.S. Adnyani N W Sugitariani