R Haryo Yudono
Department Of Ophthalmology, Faculty Of Medicine, Public Health And Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Comparison of corneal endothelial cell count and intraocular pressure in pure-dispersive and dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic protection in phacoemulsification surgery Agung Nugroho; R Haryo Yudono
Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran) Vol 50, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (420.95 KB) | DOI: 10.19106/JMedScie/0050032018013

Abstract

There are so many aspects should be regarded when use viscoelastic device during phacoemulsification surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of pure-dispersive viscoelastic and dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic always require more our attention to use it conveniently. The purpose of the study was to compare between pure-dispersive viscoelastic versus dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic in phacoemulsification surgery in that of corneal endothelial cell count and intraocular pressure (IOP) change. This was a cross-sectional study involving 41 eligible patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery by single operator. Data including characteristics of cataract patients, corneal endothelial cell count and IOP were taken before and after surgery. Data of characteristics of cataract patients were reported descriptively and compared using Anova and t-test. The mean change in corneal endothelial cell count on pure-dispersive viscoelastic group (71.99±71.20 cells/mm²) was lower than that on the dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic group (117.62±78.29 cells/mm²). However, it was not significantly different. The mean change in IOP on pure-dispersive viscoelastic group (0.75±1.626 mmHg) was significantly lower than that on dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic group (1.90±0.995 mmHg) (p=0.000). In conclusion, the increase of IOP in dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic group is higher than that on pure-dispersive viscoelastic group. However, there is no significant difference of the mean change in corneal endothelial cell on the both groups.
Polimorfisme V16A Gen MnSOD pada Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 dengan Retinopati Tasmini Tasmini; R. Haryo Yudono; Maliyah Madyan
Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology Vol 3, No 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1223.785 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jtbb.16446

Abstract

Complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) include diabetic retinopathy (RD) both non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The development of RD depends on environmental and genetic factors. MnSOD gene (manganese-superoxid dismutase) is one of the candidate risk factors gene for RD. The presence of V16A MnSOD gene polymorphism results in decrease of mitochondrial MnSOD enzymes expression and triggers the oxidative stress. Hyperglycemia in DM increases oxidative stress in tissues, including the retina resulting in metabolic abnormalities in the retina, which play a role in the development of DM complications, namely diabetic retinopathy. In Indonesia, especially the Javanese tribes in Yogyakarta, there has never been any research on MnSOD gene polymorphism in type 2 diabetes patients with and without retinopathy. Subjects were Poly Endocrine patients and Eye Polyclinic patients of Dr. Sardjito’s General Hospital, 121 subjects consisting of 63 type 2 DM patients without retinopathy were group 1 (KI) and 58 type 2 DM patients with retinopathy were group 2 (KII) (20 NPDR subjects and 38 PDR subjects). V16A polymorphism of MnSOD gene from leukocytes DNA was analyzed by PCR-RFLP method. From 121 DM subjects, 70 subjects with VV genotype were found, 50 subjects with VA genotype and 1 subject with AA genotype. From 63 non-RD DM subjects, 22 subjects with VA genotypes and 41 subjects with VV genotype were found, while in DM with retinopathy (non-PDR, n = 20) found 6 subjects with VA genotype and 14 subjects with VV genotype, and in DM with retinopathy (PDR, n = 38) found 1 subject with AA genotype, 22 subjects with VA genotype and 15 subjects with VV genotype. In DM with retinopathy (NPDR and PDR, n = 58), 1 subject was found with AA genotype, 27 subjects with VA genotype and 29 subjects with VV genotype.
Shortening Activated Partial Tromboplastin Time (APTT) Between Hypertension and Nonhypertension in Diabetic Mellitus Patients with Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injection Anik Ika Winarni; Ni Luh Putu Widyasti; Natalia Christina Angsana; Rizto Wisuda Senuari; Angela Nurini Agni; Agus Supartoto; Muhammad Bayu Sasongko; Haryo Yudono
International Journal of Retina Vol 2 No 2 (2019): International Journal of Retina (IJRetina) - INAVRS
Publisher : Indonesian Vitreoretinal Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35479/ijretina.2019.vol002.iss002.98

Abstract

Introduction : Bevacizumab intravitreal injection could be detectable in plasma that might interfere the coagulopathy and hemostasis condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of APTT between hypertensive and nonhypertensive diabetic mellitus patients with bevacizumab intravitreal injection. Methods : This was cohort study conducted at Sardjito General Hospital from March 2019 to June 2019. Thirty-two hypertension patients and 30 nonhypertension patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent bevacizumab intravitreal injection were included. Value of APTT was measured using ACLTOP300 machine prior and 1 week after IVB. The difference in mean APTT value prior and after IVB, range APTT value between two groups were assessed using independent t-test. The percentage of patients who had shortening of APTT in both groups was tested by two populations proportion test. Results : Mean APTT before IVB in hypertensive patients was 36.47 ± 2.92 seconds and in nonhypertensive patients was 36.33 ± 4.39 seconds with p value > 0.05. Mean value of APTT after IVB in hypertension patients was 35.42 ± 3.63 seconds and in nonhypertensive patients was 35.60 ± 3.13 seconds with p value > 0.05. APTT shortening in hypertensive patients was -1.03 ± 3.65 and nonhypertensive patients was -0.73 ± 2.55 with p value > 0.05. The risk of APTT shortening in hypertensive patients was 1.370 (0.831-2.258). The risk of APTT shortening in hypertensive patients who used antihypertensive drugs regularly was 0.538 (0.331- 0.874). Conclusion : There was no difference in shortening of APTT value 1 week after intravitreal bevacizumab injection between hypertensive and nonhypertensive groups in patients with diabetes mellitus. Hence, administration of IVB in hypertensive patients with regular antihypertensive therapy might be safe.