Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Completion of Past Gross Human Rights Violations: A Possibility of Foreign Assistance Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4470

Abstract

Abstract Past gross human rights violations that occurred in Indonesia have not yet been resolved by the Government of Indonesia. The main obstacle was the establishment of an ad hoc Human Rights Court according to Law No. 26 of 2000. In this regard, this article would like to propose a number of reasons that can justify that the time has come for gross human rights violations to be resolved with the help of foreign parties, namely by using international dispute resolution mechanism. The reasons that can be used are that Indonesia unwilling and/or unable to resolve gross human rights violations, the obligations of Erga Omnes and the application of Universal Jurisdiction principles, and state sovereignty. Keywords: Gross Human Rights Violations, International Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Indonesia
Completion of Past Gross Human Rights Violations: A Possibility of Foreign Assistance Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4470

Abstract

Abstract Past gross human rights violations that occurred in Indonesia have not yet been resolved by the Government of Indonesia. The main obstacle was the establishment of an ad hoc Human Rights Court according to Law No. 26 of 2000. In this regard, this article would like to propose a number of reasons that can justify that the time has come for gross human rights violations to be resolved with the help of foreign parties, namely by using international dispute resolution mechanism. The reasons that can be used are that Indonesia unwilling and/or unable to resolve gross human rights violations, the obligations of Erga Omnes and the application of Universal Jurisdiction principles, and state sovereignty. Keywords: Gross Human Rights Violations, International Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Indonesia
Right To Be Forgotten Vis-À-Vis Hak Atas Informasi Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6529

Abstract

Abstract Right to be forgotten (RBF)is defined as a mechanism provided by electronic system providers to delete electronic information or electronic documents that are considered irrelevant in relation to a person. When looking at the meaning of RBF, it can be said that this is also closely related to information, because one of the things that is asked to be "forgotten" is information. Talking about information, it cannot be separated from Law Number 14 of 2018 concerning Public Information Disclosure. This law emphasizes that information is a basic need for everyone in developing themselves. Moreover, obtaining information is a right guaranteed in a country that upholds human rights. In this regard, through this paper the author will answer the question whether the presence of the RBF strengthens the right to information that has been guaranteed in Law No. 14 of 2008 or vice versa. Keywords: Right to be forgotten, right to information, human rights. Abstrak Right to be forgotten (RBF) atau yang biasa disebut dengan “hak untuk dilupakan” diartikan sebagai suatu mekanisme yang disediakan oleh penyelenggara sistem elektronik untuk menghapus informasi elektronik maupun dokumen elektronik yang dianggap tidak relevan berkaitan dengan diri seseorang. Apabila melihat sepintas dari makna RBF tersebut, dapat dikatakan bahwa hal ini juga mempunyai kaitan erat dengan informasi, sebab salah satu hal yang dimintai untuk “dilupakan” ialah mengenai informasi. Berbicara mengenai informasi, maka tidak dapat dilepas-pisahkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2018 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik. Undang-Undang ini menegaskan bahwa informasi merupakan suatu kebutuhan pokok untuk setiap orang dalam mengembangkan dirinya. Terlebih lagi untuk memperoleh informasi merupakan suatu hak yang dijamin dalam negara yang menunjung tinggi hak asasi manusia. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, lewat tulisan ini penulis akan menjawab suatu pertanyaan apakah kehadiran RBF ini menguatkan hak atas informasi yang selama ini dijamin dalam UU No. 14 Tahun 2008 ataukah sebaliknya. Kata Kunci: Right to be forgotten, ha katas informasi, HAM