Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Widati Wulandari
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ADEQUACY OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF EVIL CONSPIRACY OF NARCOTICS CRIMINAL REVIEWED BY EVIDENTIARY THEORY Veronika Sihotang; Widati Wulandari; Erika Magdalena Chandra
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 3: December 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.42640

Abstract

Narcotics crime has been considered as a global crime and big issues in attempt to prevent and also by eradicate it. It's not only happens in Indonesia but also for other countries. Narcotics crime in most cases involves more than one person, who cooperates in narcotics crime. One of the criminal act involve more than one person is a conspiracy of narcotics crime. The involvement in the conspiracy is shown by two or more people agree to do narcotics crime. Admissible evidence in conspiracy of narcotics crime becomes the important issue in some of conspiracy's cases. This study used the method of judicial normative approach to review and examine the primary data such as judge's Decision and the secondary data such as related law. The purpose of this study is to know and understand whether the absence of evidence to support the defendant's denial can be the basis to proof personal's guilt and to understand how the quality of the witness testimony can be the basis of criminal conviction.
Problematika Pengertian Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Perbandingan Makar dalam KUHP, WvSNI dan Sr. Widati Wulandari; Tristam P. Moeliono
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.209 KB)

Abstract

Makar dalam praktik penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia sering kali ditafsirkan terlalu luas dan karenanya menjangkau perbuatan yang tidak selayaknya dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana yang mengancam keselamatan negara. Tulisan ini hendak menelusuri kembali pemaknaan dua konsep penting dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Wetboek van Strafrecht Nederlands-Indie; WvSNI), yaitu aanslag maupun aanslag tot en feit. Metoda yang digunakan adalah metode penemuan hukum dan perbandingan hukum. Temuan terpenting adalah adanya kekeliruan penerjemahan istilah aanslag dan aanslag tot en feit secara otomatis sebagai makar dalam berbagai pasal KUHP. Koreksi terhadap itu seharusnya dilakukan agar penegakan hukum pidana tidak memunculkan ketidakadilan dalam wujud reaksi negara yang tidak proporsional dengan kadar kesalahan.  The Problematical Meaning of Aanslag-Aanslag tot en feit: Comparison of Treason in the Translated Version of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch Version AbstractTreason as a crime threatening the state’s security has been inappropriately applied to facts which does not in any way can be categorized as such. This article purports to retraceing two key concepts: aanslag (onslaught/attack) and aanslag tot en feit (commit) found in the Criminal Code. Method used in this article is legal finding and law comparison. The author’s main finding is that these concepts had been wrongly translated into treason with all the consequence thereof.Therefore, correction of the translation should avoid injustice in the form of state reaction not proportional to the wrong doing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a3
Co-Authors Erika Magdalena Chandra Tristam P. Moeliono Veronika Sihotang