Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

VARYING APPLICATION OF MOST-FAVOURED-NATION PRINCIPLE IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT TREATY Robertus Bima Wahyu Mahardika; Emmy Latifah
Yustisia Vol 7, No 2: August 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i2.18542

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide an academic framing of the philosophical foundation of the Most-favored-nation principle (MFN) in international investment law. The MFN principle is one of the most important principles in international law. In international investment law, MFN principle serves as a mechanism to create conditions in which foreign investors from many countries have equal opportunities to compete fairly in host country. 
THE VIOLATION OF IMMUNITY AND DIPLOMATIC RIGHTS: A STUDY OF INDONESIAN EMBASSY WIRETAPPING CASE IN MYANMAR 2003-2004 IN THE ASEAN COMMUNITY SECURITY RESISTANCE BASED ON THE 1961 VIENNA CONVENTION Christella Jessicha Theacornelia; Emmy Latifah
Journal of ASEAN Dynamics and Beyond Vol 3, No 1 (2022): VOL.3 NO. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.95 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/aseandynamics.v3i1.52145

Abstract

Immunity rights and diplomatic immunity are guaranteed protection of the rights granted by the international community legally through a collective agreement in the 1961 Vienna Convention to the diplomatic representatives to be able to perform their duties properly. The guarantee rights are in the form of the right to do their activities, the right from immunity to regulation regarding assets acquired, including the place of the embassy building. Wiretapping is an effort or attempt to legally invade the private space of another party. At the state level, wiretapping can be used as a threat for security issues. In this study, the author tried to describe the case of wiretapping the Indonesian Embassy in Myanmar in 2004. Besides explaining through the Vienna Convention perspective, as Myanmar and Indonesia are ASEAN Member Countries, the author will try to reveal ASEAN role mainly in ASEAN Security Community project.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN HARIMAU SUMATERA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA (CITES) Fatihah Firdausi; Emmy Latifah
BELLI AC PACIS Vol 3, No 2 (2017): December, 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.444 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/belli.v3i2.27484

Abstract

This research aims to determine the implementation of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) at Indonesia in order to law enforcement efforts aganist illegal trading of Sumatran Tiger in Indonesia and what kind of measures Indonesian’s goverment to enforce the law against the illegal trading of Sumatran Tiger. It is a normative legal research with descriptive mature. The data was secondary one, consist of primary, secondary, and tertier legal materials. Primary legal materials inculeds, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and Law Number 5/ 1990 regarding to Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Secondary legal materials inculdes, national and international journals, thesis, essay, cyber media and tertier legal materials consist of black law dictionary. The result showed that based on theory by Lawrence Friedman this law enforcement on illegal trading of Sumatran Tiger in Indonesia is still not implement optimally caused by incompatibility reviewed by the substance, structure, and culture of law on Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) with Law Number 5/ 1990 regarding to Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems Incompatibility by the substance, structure, and culture of law must be fixed with the steps are amandement the law substance, increased socialization of the rule of law and changes in the culture/legal culture.
DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN ZEROING OLEH AMERIKA SERIKAT TERHADAP PRODUK IMPOR UDANG DARI CHINA Zulfana Rizki Danirmala; Emmy Latifah
BELLI AC PACIS Vol 1, No 1 (2015): June, 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (211.241 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/belli.v1i1.27364

Abstract

The study aims to determine and explain the impact of anti-dumping policy of the United States on shrimp imports from China that calculated by zeroing method. This research is prescriptive normative research. Data were collected through library research. Analysis of the data used method of deductive reasoning. The results showed that zeroing policy results in margins of dumping shrimp imported products from China to be very high which affects the amount of antidumping duties paid by China to the United States. China did not get the rights to recalculate on import products from the United States as well as countries in the EU.
URGENSI PENERAPAN ATURAN KEPAILITAN LINTAS BATAS BERDASARKAN UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY DI ASEAN Pramesthi Dinar Kirana Ratri; Emmy Latifah
BELLI AC PACIS Vol 2, No 2 (2016): December, 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (374.407 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/belli.v2i2.27448

Abstract

This study’s objective is to find out about the urge of implementing cross-border insolvency regulation based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency within the ASEAN members. In accordance with the recent establishement of ASEAN Economic Community in 2015. However, integrared economy also leads to the risk of cross-border insolvency as the investments within the states member increses. To achieve these objectives, the reseacrh use normative legal research which is done by examining secondary data or literature as basic material for examination by doing a search for rules and literature relating to the cases studied. The reseach was concluded that the establishment of cross-border insolvency regulation is already needed within the ASEAN country members current state. However there are a few challenges including the difference of laws within the ASEAN members. The absence of proper regulation to satisfy the issue could leads into the possibility of legal uncertainty. The most suitable solution now are to converge the UNCITRAL model law into their national insolvency law and to recognize the international comity within the members regarding the foreign proceedings and  the cross-border insolvency proceedings within the states member.
Privacy Policy on Smart Contracts in E-Commerce Transactions Mariska Zena Wilona; Emmy Latifah; Hari Purwadi
LAW REFORM Vol 17, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.429 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v17i1.37552

Abstract

The technology of smart contract is a new technology applied in online trading. This technology has the possibility of errors and its arrangement that results in losses to buyers. This study was aimed to examine the legal certainty for the users smart contract in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia. The method used was the normative juridical method. The results of the study indicate that the privacy policy on smart contracts in e-commerce transactions based on national and international laws still has a legal vacuum in which the aspect of national law is guided by the ITE Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 and the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 20 of 2016 concerning Personal Data Protection in Electronic Systems. Then, in the aspect of international law referring to the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (MLEC), it also establishes the rules for the formation and validity of contracts made electronically and for attribution.
PENGATURAN RULES OF ORIGIN DI INDONESIA DAN MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM YANG DITIMBULKANNYA Emmy Latifah
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8618

Abstract

AbstractRules of origin is used to determine the origin of products in order to receive preferential tariff facility. It means that only the products which are from certain countries or certain region that have been bound the preferential trade agreements which entitled on the preferential tariff. Moreover, rules of origin also plays the role to prevent trade deflection. In this context, it becomes the mechanism to preclude import products that do not originate from a particular countries or region through the state which applies the lowest external tariff. Therefore, regulating rules of origin in each country bound the preferential trade agreement is needed. This research examined how Indonesia regulated rules of origin in its national legal order and the legal problems arose from its regulation. Indonesian rules of origin defined limited to technical rule. As a result, Indonesia has the potential to be harmed in international trade traffic. In addition, institutional problem is also a matter of concern. Because Indonesia does not have a special agency dealing with rules of origin, thus it creates difficulty for many parties, not just the perpetrators of international trade, but also the government. AbstrakRules of origin adalah mekanisme yang digunakan untuk menentukan asal produk dalam rangka mendapatkan fasilitas tarif preferensial. Hanya produk-produk yang berasal dari negara tertentu yang telah terikat pada satu perjanjian preferensial saja yang dapat menikmati tarif preferensial. Selain itu, rules of origin juga berfungsi untuk mencegah defleksi perdagangan. Dalam konteks ini, rules of origin menjadi mekanisme pencegahan masuknya produk-produk yang bukan berasal dari kawasan tertentu melalui negara yang menerapkan tarif eksternal paling rendah. Oleh sebab itu, pengaturan rules of origin di setiap negara yang terlibat dalam perjanjian perdagangan preferensial sangat diperlukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan rules of origin di Indonesia dan masalah-masalah hukum yang ditimbulkan dari pengaturan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia belum memiliki aturan rules of origin yang bersifat komprehensif. Aturan mengenai rules of origin di Indonesia masih dimaknai sebatas aturan teknis saja. Akibatnya, Indonesia berpotensi untuk dirugikan dalam lalu lintas perdagangan internasional. Selain itu, masalah kelembagaan juga menjadi hal yang perlu diperhatikan. Indonesia belum memiliki lembaga yang khusus menangani rules of origin, sehingga hal ini menyulitkan banyak pihak, tidak saja pihak pelaku perdagangan internasional, tapi juga pihak pemerintah.