Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Widyariset Widyariset
Dian Kurniasih
Kementerian Pertanian
Aerospace Engineering Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Neuroscience Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ANALYSIS OF LAND CARRYING CAPACITY AND NON BEHAVIOURAL CAUSES EFFECTS TO FARMER’S BEHAVIOUR ON WET LAND CONSERVATIONS IN KULON PROGO REGENCY Dian Kurniasih
Widyariset Vol 16, No 1 (2013): Widyariset
Publisher : Pusbindiklat - LIPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.967 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/widyariset.16.1.2013.59-70

Abstract

The research aimed to analyze: (1) the level of farmers behaviour on wet land conservations in Kulon Progo Regency; (2) the impact of land carrying capacity and non behavioural causes to farmers behaviour on wet land conservations; (3) the impact of farmers behaviour on wet land conservations of their agribusiness income. The method used in this study was descriptive analysis. The research was done in Kulon Progo Regency. The location chosen by purposive sampling method represented area that have high or low level of land carrying capacity. The respondents were chosen by multistage random sampling method. The analysis methods used in this research are proportion test by Dajan, multiple linear regression analysis, and simple linear regression analysis. The results indicated that more than 50% farmers in Kulon Progo Regency have a high level of conservations behaviour. The level of land carrying capacity did not influence farmers behaviour on wet land conservations. Non behavioural causes influenced the farmers behaviour on wet land conservations significantly were age, conservation knowledge, motivation, activity in group, non agribusiness income, availability of organics input and leadership. The high level of farmer’s behaviour on wet land conservations did not influence their agribusiness income.
THE ANALYSIS OF LAND CARRYING CAPACITY AND NON BEHAVIOURAL CAUSES EFFECTS TO FARMER’S BEHAVIOUR ON WET LAND CONSERVATIONS IN KULON PROGO REGENCY Dian Kurniasih
Widyariset Vol 16, No 1 (2013): Widyariset
Publisher : Pusbindiklat - LIPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.967 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/widyariset.16.1.2013.59-70

Abstract

The research aimed to analyze: (1) the level of farmers behaviour on wet land conservations in Kulon Progo Regency; (2) the impact of land carrying capacity and non behavioural causes to farmers behaviour on wet land conservations; (3) the impact of farmers behaviour on wet land conservations of their agribusiness income. The method used in this study was descriptive analysis. The research was done in Kulon Progo Regency. The location chosen by purposive sampling method represented area that have high or low level of land carrying capacity. The respondents were chosen by multistage random sampling method. The analysis methods used in this research are proportion test by Dajan, multiple linear regression analysis, and simple linear regression analysis. The results indicated that more than 50% farmers in Kulon Progo Regency have a high level of conservations behaviour. The level of land carrying capacity did not influence farmers behaviour on wet land conservations. Non behavioural causes influenced the farmers behaviour on wet land conservations significantly were age, conservation knowledge, motivation, activity in group, non agribusiness income, availability of organics input and leadership. The high level of farmer’s behaviour on wet land conservations did not influence their agribusiness income.
Co-Authors