Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Widyariset Widyariset
Edwin Hidayat
Balai Teknik Lalu Lintas dan Lingkungan Jalan, Pusat Litbang Jalan dan Jembatan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum
Aerospace Engineering Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Neuroscience Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Widyariset

 1 
SELECTION OF CROSSING FACILITIES BASED ON CRITICAL GAP (CASE STUDY DHARMAWANGSA STREET, SURABAYA) Edwin Hidayat
Widyariset Vol 15, No 3 (2012): Widyariset
Publisher : Pusbindiklat - LIPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (322.068 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/widyariset.15.3.2012.587–592

Abstract

Pedestrians have a high risk to be hit by motor vehicle when they crossed the street, thus the choose ofappropriate cross facilities are very important. An alternative for choosing cross facilities are by using the CriticalGap method. This method is used to measure the possibility of crossing the street safely. This study was startedby gathering primary data for 4 hours at the traffic peak hours. From the calculation, the case of DharmawangsaStreet, Surabaya, showed that the critical gap is about 3,55 seconds. The observation from 07.00-11.00 a.m.showed that the possibilities of crossing the road respectively are: 45, 55, 56, and 60. Compared to the numberpedestrians crossing the road, the research showed about 71, 24, 33, and 49 peoples. In this case, the possibility ofcrossing the street at 07.00-08.00 a.m. cannot be fulfilled. Meanwhile, the possibility to cross the street with safelyat 08.00-11.00 a.m. can be fulfilled. Therefore, the use of midblock crosses is still relevant.
Co-Authors