Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN BERMARTABAT DALAM PARADOKS ETIKA DAN HUKUM Fradhana Putra Disantara
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 22 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4211

Abstract

The law and ethics have a relationship between the two. However, there are often conflicts between law and ethics. This phenomenon is as happened in the case of cancellation by the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical decision that is final and binding from the Election Organizing Honorary Council (DKPP). This study uses a statutory and conceptual approach by using primary and secondary legal materials. The two legal materials are inventoried to obtain a prescriptive legal analysis and provide a holistic conceptual study of the legal issues discussed. This legal research aims to analyze the position of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia concerning infrastructure and ethical decisions and to investigate the enigma between law and ethics in one case in the perspective of a dignified justice theory. The study results show that the DKPP decision's position is equivalent to a legal court decision. On the other hand, the role of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia is equal; and is based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the perspective of the theory of dignified justice, the cancellation of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical judgment of the DKPP has ‘abused’ the three legal functions. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish between Presidential Decrees, which are products of administrative law and the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the decision of the DKPP ethical court. Keywords: Law and Ethics, Dignified Justice, DKPP, Ethics Court.
Tripartite Collaborative Institutions: Skema Konvergensi Institusi Untuk Mewujudkan Ketahanan Siber Indonesia Fradhana Putra Disantara
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2021): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v18i2.3641

Abstract

Cybercrime is a crime that is carried out systematically to damage or destroy computer networks, and will automatically have an impact on important data stored on the computer network. This article is written using a normative legal research method, with data sources in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, understood using a conceptual approach and a statute approach, then the data is analyzed qualitatively through deductive thinking. From the results of the research, it is known that the weakness of technical and non-technical infrastructure related to the network and information systems of a country is one of the reasons of cyber crime. So we need a defense concept that can overcome these weaknesses. The concept of cyber defense with tripartite collaborative institutions can be used as an option to strengthen cyber defense. With a system of cooperation between the Ministry of Defense, Kominfo, and BSSN. The Ministry of Defense focuses on cyber threats from abroad, the Ministry of Communication and Information focuses on cyber threats from within the country, while BSNN focuses on coordination, prevention, and handling of cyber crimes.
ASPEK IMUNITAS DALAM PENANGANAN CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 Fradhana Putra Disantara
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2020): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1034.003 KB) | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v17i1.2049

Abstract

Abstrak Pemerintah Indonesia telah menerbitkan berbagai aturan sebagai upaya memberikan dasar hukum yang sah atas penanganan teknis COVID-19, antara lain Keputusan Presiden (Keppres) No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Kedaruratan Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti undang-undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Negara Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Covid 19 Dan/Atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman Yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional Dan/Atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan. Dengan adanya Keppres No. 11 Tahun 2020, Pemerintah Indonesia menetapkan status darurat kesehatan masyarakat. Namun, hal ini menimbulkan problematik, terkait status hukum yang tepat dalam masa pandemi COVID-19. Di samping itu, rumusan Pasal 27 Perppu No. 1 tahun 2020 juga meninggalkan problem, dengan Pasal 27 tersebut yang sejatinya memberikan aspek imunitas yang kuat bagi para pelaksana peraturan tersebut. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum. Penelitian hukum ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa relevansi antara penetapan status darurat kesehatan masyarakat dengan konsep hukum tata negara darurat, dan mengidentifikasi aspek imunitas dalam rumusan Pasal 27 Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2020. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan statute approach dan conseptual approach, dengan menginventarisasi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder agar mendapatkan analisa yang seyogianya dan telaah kritis terkait isu hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa status hukum yang tepat dalam masa pandemi COVID-19 adalah darurat hukum negara, dan aspek imunitas dalam rumusan Pasal 27 Perppu bertentangan dengan sejumlah Pasal dalam UUD NRI 1945. Untuk itu, Mahkamah Konstitusi seyogyanya membatalkan Pasal 27 Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2020
Co-Authors