Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Hasanuddin Law Review
Khairil Azmin Mokhtar
International Islamic University Malaysia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Institutions and Mechanisms for Internal Conflict Resolution: Legal and Non-Legal Means in Resolving Dispute and Attaining Justice in Malaysia Khairil Azmin Mokhtar
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0078.171-185

Abstract

Seeking justice is a noble cause and dispensing justice is an obligation that the state must fulfill. Under the doctrine of separation of powers courts exist to protect people and their rights, to guarantee fairness and justice for all. The task to combat injustices, produce a just ordering of society, ensure a fair distribution of material and legal resources, safeguard the rule of law, promote equality, ensure proportionality in punishment, and protect entitlements and legitimate expectations should not be put on the shoulders of judges and courts only. It must be spread out and shared by other institutions and by whatever means available
The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes among the State Organs Iwan Satriawan; Khairil Azmin Mokhtar
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (587.191 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v5i2.1669

Abstract

The paper attempts to assess the role of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia in the process of consolidating democracy in the country. Examinations are made on the court’s decisions regarding dispute concerning jurisdiction among state organs. This paper argues that the Constitutional Court has not made a significant impact on the promotion of democracy. It is believed that the failure of the Court to consolidate democracy through its decisions regarding dispute concerning jurisdiction among state organs could be attributed to two main reasons. The first is due to the unclear concept of subjectum litis of the petitioners to have legal standing in the Constitutional Court, and the second is the lack of understanding of the subject matter jurisdiction of the Court. Due to uncertainties only, small numbers cases registered and heard by the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, most of the cases registered in the Court either been rejected or not been accepted by the judges. Despite the misgivings, the Court is still relevant and have certain contributions towards democracy. It has to a certain extent that enhances the working of checks and balances mechanisms among state organs. It is believed that the court could be more reliable and enhance its function in promoting democracy in the country by defining clearly classification of the subjectum litis as well as the objectum litis of the dispute that it may hear.
The Challenges of Shariah Penal Code and Legal Pluralism in Aceh Muhammad Razi; Khairil Azmin Mokhtar
Jurnal Media Hukum Volume 27, Number 2, December 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20200151

Abstract

An outstanding feature of Aceh Special Region is its autonomy relating to the administration of Islamic Criminal justice system. Undoubtedly this power is one of the key features of the devolution of power to the region. It is a tedious process with numerous challenges and obstacles. The research paper aims to examine whether the prolonged development pertaining to the Islamic Criminal justice system's administration is due to the constitutional and administrative arrangements or actually lies in society. Devolution requires well-structured and systematic planning and execution. It involves various mechanisms and touches many issues. To blame the system for protracted progress is not something unexpected. However, the perception of the public or society of Aceh relating to the Shariah Criminal Justice System also has a significant impact. The research shows that despite the general manifestation of the local population's willingness and support for the system, some issues have emerged. The research reveals that the challenges and obstacles in prolonged development come from both the society and the system. Lack of understanding of the society towards Syariah Penal Code, problems faced by members of the People Representative Council (DPR) Aceh in drafting the Code, and the need to ensure strict compliance of the Code with Syariah are among obstacles faced. The issues and their effect on the implementation and enforcement of Aceh's Syariah Penal Code are scrutinized in the research paper.  This is a qualitative study based on library and internet research. It is also legal research whereby the relevant laws are examined.  The devolution in Aceh is more complicated than in other regions because it is coupled with "dualisme hukum" or legal pluralism within the Indonesian legal system.
Co-Authors Iwan Satriawan Muhammad Razi