R. Widdie Andriyanto
Universitas Lampung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan, Kepemilikan Saham Asing, Konsentrasi dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Kualitas Pelaksanaan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Einde Evana; R. Widdie Andriyanto; Betaria Sylvia H. A. Marbun
Journal of Accounting and Investment Vol 8, No 1: January 2007
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.074 KB)

Abstract

The background of this research is there are so many research that successfully found the positive influence of corporate governance implementation toward company performance. According to various research about corporate governance, writer interested to do this research with the aim is to look for factors influencing quality of corporate governance implementation of public companies in Indonesia. The sample of this research is public companies in Indonesia, especially companies participated in survey done by IICG on 2001-2004. Based on purposive judgement sampling method, selected 40 public companies from 138 population as a sample of the research, also including on top ten rank based on IICG Rating. The process of data done with Microsoft Excel and Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 11.0 with multiple regression in certainty level 90% or error analysis level (á ) 0.10. With multiple regression analysis and probability analysis value 0.10, the result of statistical test state that independent variable (leverage) influential positive and significant toward quality of corporate governance implementation of company, where as variable of foreign stock ownership concentration have positive relationship but not significantly toward quality of corporate governance implementation of company. For variable of company growth not influential positively and significant toward quality corporate governance implementation of company. Based on the whole result of test obtained the summary that quality of corporate governance implementation of public companies in Indonesia still very low because there were other factors influencing corporate governance implementation of company. These situation supported with so many research have done, even by institution or personal to measure the quality of corporate governance in various country and the result in Indonesia always still in low rank and low value for the quality of corporate governance compare with other countries.  
Perbandingan Tingkat Kelengkapan Mandatory Disclosure dan Voluntary Disclosure Informasi Akuntansi antara Industri High-Profile dan Low-Profile R. Widdie Andriyanto; Mega Metalia
Journal of Accounting and Investment Vol 12, No 1: January 2011
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (383.465 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is proofing empirically whether any differences the completeness level of disclosure between high-profile industry and low-profile, along with detecting to the best of the completeness level of disclosure in various company of industry sector in Indonesian Stock exchange. Difference completeness level voluntary disclosure that significant between high profile industry and low-profile. In this research, analysis instrument that be used is Disclosure Completeness Index and mean different test Independent Sample t-Test by conviction level 95% and error level 5%. The trial result Ha1 that be done 31 various company sector industry (15 high-profile companies and 16 low-profile industry) show that Sig. (2-tailed)/2 0,05/2, with the result that Ha1 accepted. It means there are differences completeness level mandatory disclosure that significant between high-profile industry and low-profile. Whereas trial result Ha2 to 28 various company sector industry (13 high-profile companies and 15 low-profile industry) show that Sig. (2-tailed)/2 0,05/2, with the result that Ha2 rejected. This case give evidence that there are not differences between completenees level voluntary disclosure that significant between high-profile industry and low-profile.