Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit) JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit)
Aisyah Shofiatun Nisa
Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Differences Of Doctor Adherence And Medical Record Completeness In Accredited And Unaccredited Primary Health Care Aisyah Shofiatun Nisa
JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit) Vol 7, No 1 (2018): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta in Clollaboration with ADMMIRASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmmr.7154

Abstract

In the field of medical and dentistry, medical records is one of authentic evidence a service provided by doctor and dentist, which contain clinical record of a patient. Accreditation is one of method made by government to control and maintain the quality of public health service. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in the completeness medical records at primary health care that have been accredited and haven’t. Quantitative descriptive method which observes the field condition is used in this research. Approximately the knowledge of a doctor on accredited Primary Health Care is 69.4% while 65.27% for unaccredited Primary health care. As for the assessment for adherence a doctor on accredited Primary Health Care is 87.64% while 73.52% for unaccredited. The completeness medical records from (n: 300 medical records at 6 Primary health care) accredited Primary health care is on 80.33% while unaccredited Primary health care is on 68%. Based on the analysis using paired t-test to assess the differences between the completeness medical records at accredited and unaccredited Primary health care obtained sig value 0.0001. There is a difference in the completeness the medical record between accredited Primary health care and unaccredited Primary health care.
The Differences Of Doctor Adherence And Medical Record Completeness In Accredited And Unaccredited Primary Health Care Aisyah Shofiatun Nisa
JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018): April 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmmr.7154

Abstract

In the field of medical and dentistry, medical records is one of authentic evidence a service provided by doctor and dentist, which contain clinical record of a patient. Accreditation is one of method made by government to control and maintain the quality of public health service. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in the completeness medical records at primary health care that have been accredited and haven’t. Quantitative descriptive method which observes the field condition is used in this research. Approximately the knowledge of a doctor on accredited Primary Health Care is 69.4% while 65.27% for unaccredited Primary health care. As for the assessment for adherence a doctor on accredited Primary Health Care is 87.64% while 73.52% for unaccredited. The completeness medical records from (n: 300 medical records at 6 Primary health care) accredited Primary health care is on 80.33% while unaccredited Primary health care is on 68%. Based on the analysis using paired t-test to assess the differences between the completeness medical records at accredited and unaccredited Primary health care obtained sig value 0.0001. There is a difference in the completeness the medical record between accredited Primary health care and unaccredited Primary health care.
Co-Authors