Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Annual Research Seminar Archipel: Journal of Indonesian Interdisciplinary Studies
Putri Wulandari
Universitas Sriwijaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Cluster Perolehan Medali pada Asian Games 2018 Menggunakan Metode K-Means Suci Dwi Lestari; Putri Wulandari
Annual Research Seminar (ARS) Vol 4, No 1 (2018): ARS 2018
Publisher : Annual Research Seminar (ARS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak—Asian Games adalah ajang terbaik untuk membuktikan keunggulan dari masing-masing negara yang diukur dari jumlah medali yang diperoleh. Mayoritas peraih medali tertinggi di ajang Asian Games adalah negara yang tingkat perekonomian dan populasinya tinggi. Pada paper ini, kami akan membuktikan apakah ada hubungan antara jumlah medali yang didapat terhadap GDP growth dan populasi pada kontingen negara-negara peserta Asian Games 2018. Metode yang digunakan adalah K-Means Clustering. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pembuktian apakah terdapat hubungan antara jumlah medali yang didapat dengan GDP growth dan populasi kontingen negara-negara peserta Asian Games 2018.Kata Kunci—Asian Games, GDP growth, populasi, clustering, K-Means
Normative Legal Research Methodology from the Experts' Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of Concepts and Approaches Putri Wulandari
Archipel: Journal of Indonesian Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 1 No. 6 (2026): Archipel - February
Publisher : PT. AVID MEDIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65739/archipel.v1i6.34

Abstract

Normative legal research is the dominant approach in the Indonesian legal scholarly tradition, but the use of terms and approaches is often not accompanied by precise methodological explanations. This condition creates conceptual ambiguity that has implications for the weak construction of scientific arguments. This study aims to comparatively analyze the conceptualization of normative legal research according to experts and reconstruct its methodological boundaries to be more systematic and operational. The method used is normative legal research with a conceptual and comparative approach, through a literature study of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis is conducted qualitatively using descriptive-analytical and argumentative techniques to test the logical consistency, systemic coherence, and prescriptive power of each approach. The results of the study indicate that normative legal research cannot be reduced to a textual review of laws and regulations but must combine legislative, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches within the framework of the hierarchy of norms and legal principles. The method of interpretation and construction of legal arguments are central instruments for overcoming normative ambiguity and maintaining prescriptive validity. Integrative methodological reconstruction produces a more coherent, principle-based normative research model, and is able to provide rational and scientifically accountable legal solutions.
Co-Authors Suci Dwi Lestari