Chinedu Ifeakor
Nnamdi Azikiwe University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RECOVERY OF HUMAN DIGINITY; KANTIAN CONSIDERATION Chinedu Ifeakor; Anselm Ikenna Odo
Jurnal Sosialisasi: Jurnal Hasil Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Keilmuan Sosiologi Pendidikan Volume 8, Nomor 1, Maret 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/sosialisasi.v0i3.19955

Abstract

This paper tends to recover the dignity of human person using Kant’s view point. Human dignity has for long being in a state of pang.  It has been in the lowest esteem in the contemporary society; human right abuses, depersonalization of man, and lack of human respect. The researchers adopt expository method in carrying out the work. The researchers conclude that human life is a phenomenon characterized by a high sense of uniqueness. Every human person ought to be properly treated with such uniqueness, bearing in mind that- all are one and the same people.This paper tends to recover the dignity of human person using Kant’s view point. Human dignity has for long being in a state of pang.  It has been in the lowest esteem in the contemporary society; human right abuses, depersonalization of man, and lack of human respect. The researchers adopt expository method in carrying out the work. The researchers conclude that human life is a phenomenon characterized by a high sense of uniqueness. Every human person ought to be properly treated with such uniqueness, bearing in mind that- all are one and the same people. Keywords:Recovery, human person and dignity.
PHILOSOPHICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PROBLEM OF FACEBOOK COMMUNITY STANDARDS VIS-A-VIS S.L ANDERSON & M. ANDERSON PROBLEMS OF MACHINE ETHICS Jecinta C Nwobi; Chinedu Ifeakor
Jurnal Ilmu Sosiologi Dialektika Kontemporer Vol. 11, No. 1, Januari-Juni 2023
Publisher : dialektika kontemporer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The twenty-first century world is increasingly being populated by autonomous artificial machines equipped with sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Facebook in 2018 made a breakthrough with the introduction of some ethically modeled policies known as the Facebook Community Standards. Facebook Community Standards can be described as an Artificial Moral Agent whose policy rationale is to create a safe space for users by prohibiting contents that contradict some universal moral standards. This paper using the research methodology of analysis attempts to identify the ethical problem (s) surrounding the enforcement of Facebook Community Standards and evaluate the identified problem (s) vis a vis M. Anderson and S.L Andersons’ postulations on problems facing the development of machine ethics. M. Anderson & S.L Anderson postulated that the major issues facing the development of machine ethics is the question about the possibility or impossibility of computing ethics into machines posed by ethical issues of moral relativism, moral universalism, ethical emotivism, moral consciousness among others. Akin these ethical issues, this work observed that the users of Facebook are unjustly punished and segregated by the non-relative nature of the Community Standards to their individual moral and social values. Recommending as a solution to this problem, the research proposed the inclusion of the relativism to the enforcement of the community standards, that is, the universalism of the standards enforcement globally should take into view the reality of non-uniformity of ethical and moral values.